[Python-Dev] BDFL-Delegate appointments for several PEPs (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Mar 25 14:22:41 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL-Delegate appointments for several PEPs
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 576/580: on the complexity of function calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:03 PM Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
On 3/24/2019 8:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> We'll be announcing those appointments as we go, so I'm happy to > report that I will be handling the BDFL-Delegate responsibilities for > the following PEPs: Where do we discuss these?
Either as a topic on discuss.python.org or as a separate thread here on python-dev.
-Brett
If a delegate has a provisional view, it might help focus discussion if that were known. > * PEP 499: Binding "-m" executed modules under their module name as > well as
_main_My brief response: +1 unless there is a good reason not. There have been multiple double module problems reported on python-list and likely stackoverflow. And would there be any impact on circular imports? -- Terry Jan Reedy
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20190325/8949a800/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL-Delegate appointments for several PEPs
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 576/580: on the complexity of function calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]