[Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library (original) (raw)
André Malo nd at perlig.de
Tue May 21 08:25:14 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Dienstag, 21. Mai 2019 13:50:30 CEST Victor Stinner wrote:
Well, that makes sense. But so, what is the metric to decide if a module is "widely used" or not?
Yes. Exactly the question that pops up right now. I think, that's the main issue when including batteries in general (that's not news though :-). And the problem I see there is: There is no valid answer.
(Sorry if I seem to be just annoying. That's not intended, I'm just not carrying the good news.)
nd
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq@{[reverse split/::/ =>PACKAGE]};
André Malo # http://www.perlig.de
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]