[Python-Dev] PEP 594: update 1 (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue May 21 14:15:28 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: update 1
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: update 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/21/2019 10:12 AM, Christian Heimes wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------- PEP: 594 Title: Removing dead batteries from the standard library
'dead' seems controversial. 'nearly useless' should be less so. I think 'after 2.7 end-of-life' is worth adding, as the schedule hinges around that. Result:
"Removing nearly useless batteries from the standard library after 2.7 end-of-life."
Abstract ========
Rationale =========
Part of the point of the PEP is to gather together nearly all proposals in one place so users can respond in a timely fashion.
Deprecation schedule ====================
I think it worth adding that some modules were deprecated years ago but kept until after 2.7 end-of-life to ease 3.x transition. Removing modules is not a sudden new idea.
Also, the proposed schedule (with one exception) is a slower alternative than proposals to add a deprecation warning (if not one already) in 3.8 and remove in 3.9.
-- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: update 1
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594: update 1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]