[Python-Dev] [SPAM?] Re: PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals() (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Mon May 27 09:12:40 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [SPAM?] Re: PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/27/2019 3:18 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Except that it does. After calling locals() a second time, the result of the first call will be updated to reflect changes. Yeow. That's really unintuitive. There had better be an extremely good reason for this behaviour.
I believe that the situation is or can be thought of as this: there is exactly 1 function locals dict. Initially, it is empty and inaccessible (unusable) from code. Each locals() call updates the dict to a current snapshot and returns it.
-- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [SPAM?] Re: PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 558: Defined semantics for locals()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]