[Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon May 27 11:05:32 EDT 2019
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 27 May 2019 09:27:33 -0400 David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 11:17 PM Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> > Nobody reads warnings. > > If nobody reads warnings, we should just remove the warnings module and > be done with it. That should probably be a PEP. > We'll have to start issuing a PendingDeprecationWarning when folk import the
warnings
module. :-)
And message users that they can pip install warnings
to get the
independently-maintained version ;-)
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 594 - a proposal for unmaintained modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]