[Python-ideas] Adding a subprocess.CompletedProcess class (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Mon Feb 2 17:05:41 CET 2015
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Adding a subprocess.CompletedProcess class
- Next message: [Python-ideas] "atexit" equivalent for functions in contextlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2 February 2015 at 16:00, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> wrote:
For the capture and forward of output you probably want to base a solution on https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-subprocess.html these days rather than rolling your own poll + read + echo loop.
For integrating with existing code, can asyncio interoperate with subprocess.Popen objects? I couldn't see how from my reading of the docs. It feels to me from the docs as if asyncio is an architecture choice - if you're not using asncio throughout your program, it's of no help to you. I may well have misunderstood something, though, as I thought one of the aims of asyncio was that it could work in conjunction with more traditional code.
Paul
PS Are there any good asyncio tutorials? Particularly ones not about implementing network protocols. It feels like you need a degree to understand the docs :-(
- Previous message: [Python-ideas] Adding a subprocess.CompletedProcess class
- Next message: [Python-ideas] "atexit" equivalent for functions in contextlib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]