[over.match.funcs] (original) (raw)

12 Overloading [over]

12.4 Overload resolution [over.match]

12.4.2 Candidate functions and argument lists [over.match.funcs]

12.4.2.1 General [over.match.funcs.general]

The subclauses of [over.match.funcs] describe the set of candidate functions and the argument list submitted to overload resolution in each context in which overload resolution is used.

The source transformations and constructions defined in these subclauses are only for the purpose of describing the overload resolution process.

An implementation is not required to use such transformations and constructions.

The set of candidate functions can contain both member and non-member functions to be resolved against the same argument list.

So that argument and parameter lists are comparable within this heterogeneous set, a member function is considered to have an extra first parameter, called theimplicit object parameter, which represents the object for which the member function has been called.

For the purposes of overload resolution, both static and non-static member functions have an implicit object parameter, but constructors do not.

Similarly, when appropriate, the context can construct an argument list that contains animplied object argumentas the first argument in the list to denote the object to be operated on.

For non-static member functions, the type of the implicit object parameter is

• “lvalue reference to cv X” for functions declared without a ref-qualifier or with the& ref-qualifier
• “rvalue reference to cv X” for functions declared with the&& ref-qualifier

whereXis the class of which the function is a member andcvis the cv-qualification on the member function declaration.

[Example 1:

For aconstmember function of classX, the extra parameter is assumed to have type “reference toconst X”.

— _end example_]

For conversion functions, the function is considered to be a member of the class of the implied object argument for the purpose of defining the type of the implicit object parameter.

For non-conversion functions introduced by ausing-declarationinto a derived class, the function is considered to be a member of the derived class for the purpose of defining the type of the implicit object parameter.

For static member functions, the implicit object parameter is considered to match any object (since if the function is selected, the object is discarded).

[Note 1:

No actual type is established for the implicit object parameter of a static member function, and no attempt will be made to determine a conversion sequence for that parameter ([over.match.best]).

— _end note_]

During overload resolution, the implied object argument is indistinguishable from other arguments.

The implicit object parameter, however, retains its identity since no user-defined conversions can be applied to achieve a type match with it.

For non-static member functions declared without a ref-qualifier, even if the implicit object parameter is not const-qualified, an rvalue can be bound to the parameter as long as in all other respects the argument can be converted to the type of the implicit object parameter.

[Note 2:

The fact that such an argument is an rvalue does not affect the ranking of implicit conversion sequences.

— _end note_]

Because other than in list-initialization only one user-defined conversion is allowed in an implicit conversion sequence, special rules apply when selecting the best user-defined conversion ([over.match.best],[over.best.ics]).

[Example 2: class T { public: T();};class C : T { public: C(int);}; T a = 1; — _end example_]

In each case where a candidate is a function template, candidate function template specializations are generated using template argument deduction ([temp.over],[temp.deduct]).

If a constructor template or conversion function template has an explicit-specifierwhose constant-expression is value-dependent ([temp.dep]), template argument deduction is performed first and then, if the context requires a candidate that is not explicit and the generated specialization is explicit ([dcl.fct.spec]), it will be removed from the candidate set.

Those candidates are then handled as candidate functions in the usual way.121

A given name can refer to one or more function templates and also to a set of non-template functions.

In such a case, the candidate functions generated from each function template are combined with the set of non-template candidate functions.

A defaulted move special member function ([class.copy.ctor], [class.copy.assign]) that is defined as deleted is excluded from the set of candidate functions in all contexts.

A constructor inherited from class type C ([class.inhctor.init]) that has a first parameter of type “reference to cv1 P” (including such a constructor instantiated from a template) is excluded from the set of candidate functions when constructing an object of type cv2 Dif the argument list has exactly one argument andC is reference-related to P andP is reference-related to D.

[Example 3: struct A { A(); A(A &&); template<typename T> A(T &&); };struct B : A { using A::A; B(const B &); B(B &&) = default; struct X { X(X &&) = delete; } x;};extern B b1; B b2 = static_cast<B&&>(b1); struct C { operator B&&(); }; B b3 = C(); — _end example_]

12.4.2.2 Function call syntax [over.match.call]

12.4.2.2.1 General [over.match.call.general]

If the postfix-expression denotes an object of class type, overload resolution is applied as specified in [over.call.object].

If the postfix-expression is the address of an overload set, overload resolution is applied using that set as described above.

If the function selected by overload resolution is a non-static member function, the program is ill-formed.

[Note 1:

The resolution of the address of an overload set in other contexts is described in [over.over].

— _end note_]

12.4.2.2.2 Call to named function [over.call.func]

Of interest in [over.call.func] are only those function calls in which thepostfix-expressionultimately contains a name that denotes one or more functions.

Such apostfix-expression, perhaps nested arbitrarily deep in parentheses, has one of the following forms:

These represent two syntactic subcategories of function calls: qualified function calls and unqualified function calls.

In qualified function calls, the name to be resolved is anid-expressionand is preceded by an->or.operator.

Since the constructA->Bis generally equivalent to(*A).B, the rest of[over] assumes, without loss of generality, that all member function calls have been normalized to the form that uses an object and the.operator.

Furthermore, [over] assumes that thepostfix-expressionthat is the left operand of the.operator has type “cv T” whereTdenotes a class.122

Under this assumption, theid-expressionin the call is looked up as a member function ofTfollowing the rules for looking up names in classes ([class.member.lookup]).

The function declarations found by that lookup constitute the set of candidate functions.

The argument list is theexpression-listin the call augmented by the addition of the left operand of the.operator in the normalized member function call as the implied object argument ([over.match.funcs]).

In unqualified function calls, the name is not qualified by an->or.operator and has the more general form of aprimary-expression.

The name is looked up in the context of the function call following the normal rules for name lookup in expressions ([basic.lookup]).

The function declarations found by that lookup constitute the set of candidate functions.

Because of the rules for name lookup, the set of candidate functions consists (1) entirely of non-member functions or (2) entirely of member functions of some classT.

In case (1), the argument list is the same as theexpression-listin the call.

In case (2), the argument list is theexpression-listin the call augmented by the addition of an implied object argument as in a qualified function call.

If the keywordthis is in scope and refers to classT, or a derived class ofT, then the implied object argument is(*this).

If the keywordthisis not in scope or refers to another class, then a contrived object of typeTbecomes the implied object argument.123

If the argument list is augmented by a contrived object and overload resolution selects one of the non-static member functions ofT, the call is ill-formed.

12.4.2.2.3 Call to object of class type [over.call.object]

If the postfix-expression Ein the function call syntax evaluates to a class object of type “cv T”, then the set of candidate functions includes at least the function call operators of T.

The function call operators of Tare obtained by ordinary lookup of the name operator()in the context of (E).operator().

In addition, for each non-explicit conversion function declared in T of the form

where the optionalcv-qualifier-seqis the same cv-qualification as, or a greater cv-qualification than,cv, and whereconversion-type-iddenotes the type “pointer to function of () returning R”, or the type “reference to pointer to function of () returning R”, or the type “reference to function of () returning R”, a surrogate call function with the unique name_call-function_and having the form

R call-function ( conversion-type-id F, P a, …, P a) { return F (a, …, a); }

is also considered as a candidate function.

Similarly, surrogate call functions are added to the set of candidate functions for each non-explicit conversion function declared in a base class ofTprovided the function is not hidden withinTby another intervening declaration.124

The argument list submitted to overload resolution consists of the argument expressions present in the function call syntax preceded by the implied object argument(E).

[Note 1:

When comparing the call against the function call operators, the implied object argument is compared against the implicit object parameter of the function call operator.

When comparing the call against a surrogate call function, the implied object argument is compared against the first parameter of the surrogate call function.

The conversion function from which the surrogate call function was derived will be used in the conversion sequence for that parameter since it converts the implied object argument to the appropriate function pointer or reference required by that first parameter.

— _end note_]

[Example 1: int f1(int);int f2(float);typedef int (*fp1)(int);typedef int (*fp2)(float);struct A { operator fp1() { return f1; } operator fp2() { return f2; } } a;int i = a(1); — _end example_]

12.4.2.3 Operators in expressions [over.match.oper]

If no operand of an operator in an expression has a type that is a class or an enumeration, the operator is assumed to be a built-in operator and interpreted according to [expr.compound].

[Note 1:

Because.,.*, and​::​cannot be overloaded, these operators are always built-in operators interpreted according to[expr.compound].

?:cannot be overloaded, but the rules in this subclause are used to determine the conversions to be applied to the second and third operands when they have class or enumeration type ([expr.cond]).

— _end note_]

[Example 1: struct String { String (const String&); String (const char*);operator const char* ();}; String operator + (const String&, const String&);void f() { const char* p= "one" + "two"; int I = 1 + 1; } — _end example_]

If either operand has a type that is a class or an enumeration, a user-defined operator function can be declared that implements this operator or a user-defined conversion can be necessary to convert the operand to a type that is appropriate for a built-in operator.

In this case, overload resolution is used to determine which operator function or built-in operator is to be invoked to implement the operator.

Therefore, the operator notation is first transformed to the equivalent function-call notation as summarized in Table 15(where @ denotes one of the operators covered in the specified subclause).

However, the operands are sequenced in the order prescribed for the built-in operator ([expr.compound]).

For a unary operator @with an operand of type cv1 T1, and for a binary operator @with a left operand of type cv1 T1and a right operand of type cv2 T2, four sets of candidate functions, designatedmember candidates,non-member candidates,built-in candidates, andrewritten candidates, are constructed as follows:

• If T1is a complete class type or a class currently being defined, the set of member candidates is the result of the qualified lookup ofT1​::​operator@ ([over.call.func]); otherwise, the set of member candidates is empty.
• The set of non-member candidates is the result of the unqualified lookup ofoperator@in the context of the expression according to the usual rules for name lookup in unqualified function calls ([basic.lookup.argdep]) except that all member functions are ignored.
  However, if no operand has a class type, only those non-member functions in the lookup set that have a first parameter of typeT1or “reference to cv T1”, whenT1is an enumeration type, or (if there is a right operand) a second parameter of typeT2or “reference to cv T2”, whenT2is an enumeration type, are candidate functions.
• For the operator,, the unary operator&, or the operator->, the built-in candidates set is empty.
  For all other operators, the built-in candidates include all of the candidate operator functions defined in [over.built] that, compared to the given operator,
  • have the same operator name, and
  • accept the same number of operands, and
  • accept operand types to which the given operand or operands can be converted according to [over.best.ics], and
  • do not have the same parameter-type-list as any non-member candidate that is not a function template specialization.
• The rewritten candidate set is determined as follows:
  • For the relational ([expr.rel]) operators, the rewritten candidates include all non-rewritten candidates for the expression x <=> y.
  • For the relational ([expr.rel]) and three-way comparison ([expr.spaceship]) operators, the rewritten candidates also include a synthesized candidate, with the order of the two parameters reversed, for each non-rewritten candidate for the expressiony <=> x.
  • For the != operator ([expr.eq]), the rewritten candidates include all non-rewritten candidates for the expression x == y.
  • For the equality operators, the rewritten candidates also include a synthesized candidate, with the order of the two parameters reversed, for each non-rewritten candidate for the expression y == x.
  • For all other operators, the rewritten candidate set is empty.
    [Note 2:
    A candidate synthesized from a member candidate has its implicit object parameter as the second parameter, thus implicit conversions are considered for the first, but not for the second, parameter.
    — _end note_]

For the built-in assignment operators, conversions of the left operand are restricted as follows:

• no temporaries are introduced to hold the left operand, and
• no user-defined conversions are applied to the left operand to achieve a type match with the left-most parameter of a built-in candidate.

For all other operators, no such restrictions apply.

The set of candidate functions for overload resolution for some operator @is the union of the member candidates, the non-member candidates, the built-in candidates, and the rewritten candidates for that operator @.

The argument list contains all of the operands of the operator.

[Example 2: struct A { operator int();}; A operator+(const A&, const A&);void m() { A a, b; a + b; } — _end example_]

If a rewritten operator<=> candidate is selected by overload resolution for an operator @,x @ yis interpreted as0 @ (y <=> x)if the selected candidate is a synthesized candidate with reversed order of parameters, or (x <=> y) @ 0 otherwise, using the selected rewritten operator<=> candidate.

Rewritten candidates for the operator @are not considered in the context of the resulting expression.

If a rewritten operator== candidate is selected by overload resolution for an operator @, its return type shall be cv bool, andx @ y is interpreted as:

• if @ is !=and the selected candidate is a synthesized candidate with reversed order of parameters,!(y == x),
• otherwise, if @ is !=,!(x == y),
• otherwise (when @ is ==),y == x,

in each case using the selected rewritten operator== candidate.

If a built-in candidate is selected by overload resolution, the operands of class type are converted to the types of the corresponding parameters of the selected operation function, except that the second standard conversion sequence of a user-defined conversion sequence is not applied.

Then the operator is treated as the corresponding built-in operator and interpreted according to [expr.compound].

[Example 3: struct X { operator double();};struct Y { operator int*();};int *a = Y() + 100.0; int *b = Y() + X(); — _end example_]

The second operand of operator->is ignored in selecting anoperator->function, and is not an argument when theoperator->function is called.

Whenoperator->returns, the operator->is applied to the value returned, with the original second operand.126

If the operator is the operator,, the unary operator&, or the operator->, and there are no viable functions, then the operator is assumed to be the built-in operator and interpreted according to[expr.compound].

[Note 3:

The lookup rules for operators in expressions are different than the lookup rules for operator function names in a function call, as shown in the following example:struct A { };void operator + (A, A);struct B { void operator + (B);void f ();}; A a;void B::f() { operator+ (a,a); a + a; }

— _end note_]

12.4.2.4 Initialization by constructor [over.match.ctor]

When objects of class type are direct-initialized, copy-initialized from an expression of the same or a derived class type ([dcl.init]), or default-initialized, overload resolution selects the constructor.

For direct-initialization or default-initialization that is not in the context of copy-initialization, the candidate functions are all the constructors of the class of the object being initialized.

For copy-initialization (including default initialization in the context of copy-initialization), the candidate functions are all the converting constructors ([class.conv.ctor]) of that class.

12.4.2.5 Copy-initialization of class by user-defined conversion [over.match.copy]

Under the conditions specified in [dcl.init], as part of a copy-initialization of an object of class type, a user-defined conversion can be invoked to convert an initializer expression to the type of the object being initialized.

Overload resolution is used to select the user-defined conversion to be invoked.

[Note 1:

The conversion performed for indirect binding to a reference to a possibly cv-qualified class type is determined in terms of a corresponding non-reference copy-initialization.

— _end note_]

Assuming that “cv1 T” is the type of the object being initialized, withTa class type, the candidate functions are selected as follows:

• When the type of the initializer expression is a class type “cv S”, the non-explicit conversion functions ofSand its base classes are considered.
  When initializing a temporary object ([class.mem]) to be bound to the first parameter of a constructor where the parameter is of type “reference to cv2 T” and the constructor is called with a single argument in the context of direct-initialization of an object of type “cv3 T”, explicit conversion functions are also considered.
  Those that are not hidden withinSand yield a type whose cv-unqualified version is the same type asTor is a derived class thereof are candidate functions.
  A call to a conversion function returning “reference to X” is a glvalue of type X, and such a conversion function is therefore considered to yield X for this process of selecting candidate functions.

In both cases, the argument list has one argument, which is the initializer expression.

[Note 2:

This argument will be compared against the first parameter of the constructors and against the implicit object parameter of the conversion functions.

— _end note_]

12.4.2.6 Initialization by conversion function [over.match.conv]

Under the conditions specified in [dcl.init], as part of an initialization of an object of non-class type, a conversion function can be invoked to convert an initializer expression of class type to the type of the object being initialized.

Overload resolution is used to select the conversion function to be invoked.

Assuming that “cv1 T” is the type of the object being initialized, and “cv S” is the type of the initializer expression, withSa class type, the candidate functions are selected as follows:

• The conversion functions ofSand its base classes are considered.
  Those non-explicit conversion functions that are not hidden withinSand yield typeTor a type that can be converted to typeTvia a standard conversion sequenceare candidate functions.
  For direct-initialization, those explicit conversion functions that are not hidden within S and yield type T or a type that can be converted to type T with a qualification conversion are also candidate functions.
  Conversion functions that return a cv-qualified type are considered to yield the cv-unqualified version of that type for this process of selecting candidate functions.
  A call to a conversion function returning “reference to X” is a glvalue of type X, and such a conversion function is therefore considered to yield X for this process of selecting candidate functions.

The argument list has one argument, which is the initializer expression.

[Note 1:

This argument will be compared against the implicit object parameter of the conversion functions.

— _end note_]

12.4.2.7 Initialization by conversion function for direct reference binding [over.match.ref]

Under the conditions specified in [dcl.init.ref], a reference can be bound directly to the result of applying a conversion function to an initializer expression.

Overload resolution is used to select the conversion function to be invoked.

Assuming that “reference to cv1 T” is the type of the reference being initialized, and “cv S” is the type of the initializer expression, withSa class type, the candidate functions are selected as follows:

• The conversion functions ofSand its base classes are considered.
  Those non-explicit conversion functions that are not hidden withinSand yield type “lvalue reference to cv2 T2” (when initializing an lvalue reference or an rvalue reference to function) or “cv2 T2” or “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” (when initializing an rvalue reference or an lvalue reference to function), where “cv1 T” is reference-compatiblewith “cv2 T2”, are candidate functions.
  For direct-initialization, those explicit conversion functions that are not hidden within S and yield type “lvalue reference to cv2 T2” (when initializing an lvalue reference or an rvalue reference to function) or “rvalue reference to cv2 T2” (when initializing an rvalue reference or an lvalue reference to function), where T2 is the same type as T or can be converted to type T with a qualification conversion, are also candidate functions.

The argument list has one argument, which is the initializer expression.

[Note 1:

This argument will be compared against the implicit object parameter of the conversion functions.

— _end note_]

12.4.2.8 Initialization by list-initialization [over.match.list]

When objects of non-aggregate class type T are list-initialized such that [dcl.init.list] specifies that overload resolution is performed according to the rules in this subclause or when forming a list-initialization sequence according to [over.ics.list], overload resolution selects the constructor in two phases:

• If the initializer list is not empty or T has no default constructor, overload resolution is first performed where the candidate functions are the initializer-list constructors ([dcl.init.list]) of the class T and the argument list consists of the initializer list as a single argument.
• Otherwise, or if no viable initializer-list constructor is found, overload resolution is performed again, where the candidate functions are all the constructors of the class T and the argument list consists of the elements of the initializer list.

In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed.

[Note 1:

This differs from other situations ([over.match.ctor], [over.match.copy]), where only converting constructors are considered for copy-initialization.

This restriction only applies if this initialization is part of the final result of overload resolution.

— _end note_]

12.4.2.9 Class template argument deduction [over.match.class.deduct]

When resolving a placeholder for a deduced class type ([dcl.type.class.deduct]) where the template-name names a primary class template C, a set of functions and function templates, called the guides of C, is formed comprising:

• If C is defined, for each constructor of C, a function template with the following properties:
  • The template parameters are the template parameters of Cfollowed by the template parameters (including default template arguments) of the constructor, if any.
  • The types of the function parameters are those of the constructor.
  • The return type is the class template specialization designated by Cand template arguments corresponding to the template parameters of C.
• If Cis not defined or does not declare any constructors, an additional function template derived as above from a hypothetical constructor C().
• An additional function template derived as above from a hypothetical constructor C(C), called the copy deduction candidate.
• For each deduction-guide, a function or function template with the following properties:
  • The template parameters, if any, and function parameters are those of the deduction-guide.

In addition, if C is defined and its definition satisfies the conditions for an aggregate class ([dcl.init.aggr]) with the assumption that any dependent base class has no virtual functions and no virtual base classes, and the initializer is a non-empty braced-init-list or parenthesized expression-list, and there are no deduction-guides for C, the set contains an additional function template, called the aggregate deduction candidate, defined as follows.

For each , let be the corresponding aggregate element of C or of one of its (possibly recursive) subaggregates that would be initialized by ([dcl.init.aggr]) if

• brace elision is not considered for any aggregate element that has a dependent non-array type or an array type with a value-dependent bound, and
• each non-trailing aggregate element that is a pack expansion is assumed to correspond to no elements of the initializer list, and
• a trailing aggregate element that is a pack expansion is assumed to correspond to all remaining elements of the initializer list (if any).

If there is no such aggregate element for any , the aggregate deduction candidate is not added to the set.

The aggregate deduction candidate is derived as above from a hypothetical constructor , where

• if is of array type and is a braced-init-list or string-literal, is an rvalue reference to the declared type of , and
• otherwise, is the declared type of ,

except that additional parameter packs of the form are inserted into the parameter list in their original aggregate element position corresponding to each non-trailing aggregate element of type that was skipped because it was a parameter pack, and the trailing sequence of parameters corresponding to a trailing aggregate element that is a pack expansion (if any) is replaced by a single parameter of the form .

The guides of A are the set of functions or function templates formed as follows.

For each function or function template f in the guides of the template named by the simple-template-idof the defining-type-id, the template arguments of the return type of fare deduced from the defining-type-id of Aaccording to the process in [temp.deduct.type]with the exception that deduction does not fail if not all template arguments are deduced.

Let g denote the result of substituting these deductions into f.

If substitution succeeds, form a function or function template f'with the following properties and add it to the set of guides of A:

• The function type of f' is the function type of g.
• If f is a function template,f' is a function template whose template parameter list consists of all the template parameters of A(including their default template arguments) that appear in the above deductions or (recursively) in their default template arguments, followed by the template parameters of f that were not deduced (including their default template arguments), otherwise f' is not a function template.
• The associated constraints ([temp.constr.decl]) are the conjunction of the associated constraints of g and a constraint that is satisfied if and only if the arguments of A are deducible (see below) from the return type.
• If f is a copy deduction candidate, then f' is considered to be so as well.

The arguments of a template A are said to be deducible from a type T if, given a class templatetemplate <typename> class AA;with a single partial specialization whose template parameter list is that of A and whose template argument list is a specialization of Awith the template argument list of A ([temp.dep.type]),AA<T> matches the partial specialization.

Initialization and overload resolution are performed as described in [dcl.init] and [over.match.ctor], [over.match.copy], or [over.match.list] (as appropriate for the type of initialization performed) for an object of a hypothetical class type, where the guides of the template named by the placeholder are considered to be the constructors of that class type for the purpose of forming an overload set, and the initializer is provided by the context in which class template argument deduction was performed.

The following exceptions apply:

• The first phase in [over.match.list](considering initializer-list constructors) is omitted if the initializer list consists of a single expression of type cv U, where U is, or is derived from, a specialization of the class template directly or indirectly named by the placeholder.
• During template argument deduction for the aggregate deduction candidate, the number of elements in a trailing parameter pack is only deduced from the number of remaining function arguments if it is not otherwise deduced.

All such notional constructors are considered to be public members of the hypothetical class type.

[Example 1: template <class T> struct A { explicit A(const T&, ...) noexcept; A(T&&, ...); };int i; A a1 = { i, i }; A a2{i, i}; A a3{0, i}; A a4 = {0, i}; template <class T> A(const T&, const T&) -> A<T&>; template <class T> explicit A(T&&, T&&) -> A<T>; A a5 = {0, 1}; A a6{0,1}; A a7 = {0, i}; A a8{0,i}; template <class T> struct B { template <class U> using TA = T;template <class U> B(U, TA<U>);}; B b{(int*)0, (char*)0}; template <typename T> struct S { T x; T y;};template <typename T> struct C { S<T> s; T t;};template <typename T> struct D { S<int> s; T t;}; C c1 = {1, 2}; C c2 = {1, 2, 3}; C c3 = {{1u, 2u}, 3}; D d1 = {1, 2}; D d2 = {1, 2, 3}; template <typename T> struct E { T t;decltype(t) t2;}; E e1 = {1, 2}; template <typename... T> struct Types {};template <typename... T> struct F : Types<T...>, T... {};struct X {};struct Y {};struct Z {};struct W { operator Y(); }; F f1 = {Types<X, Y, Z>{}, {}, {}}; F f2 = {Types<X, Y, Z>{}, X{}, Y{}}; F f3 = {Types<X, Y, Z>{}, X{}, W{}}; — _end example_]

[Example 2: template <class T, class U> struct C { C(T, U); };template<class T, class U> C(T, U) -> C<T, std::type_identity_t<U>>; template<class V> using A = C<V *, V *>;template<std::integral W> using B = A<W>;int i{};double d{}; A a1(&i, &i); A a2(i, i); A a3(&i, &d); B b1(&i, &i); B b2(&d, &d);

Possible exposition-only implementation of the above procedure: template <class> class AA;template <class V> class AA<A<V>> { };template <class T> concept deduces_A = requires { sizeof(AA<T>); };template<T, U> auto f1(T, U) -> C<T, U>;template<class V> requires deduces_A<C<V *, V *>> auto f1_prime(V *, V*) -> C<V *, V *>;template<class T, class U> auto f2(T, U) -> C<T, std::type_identity_t<U>>;template<class V, class U> requires deduces_A<C<V *, std::type_identity_t<U>>> auto f2_prime(V *, U) -> C<V *, std::type_identity_t<U>>;template <class> class BB;template <class V> class BB<B<V>> { };template <class T> concept deduces_B = requires { sizeof(BB<T>); };template<std::integral W> requires deduces_A<C<W *, W *>> && deduces_B<C<W *, W *>> auto f1_prime_for_B(W *, W *) -> C<W *, W *>;template<std::integral W, class U> requires deduces_A<C<W *, std::type_identity_t<U>>> && deduces_B<C<W *, std::type_identity_t<U>>> auto f2_prime_for_B(W *, U) -> C<W *, std::type_identity_t<U>>;

— _end example_]