Unicode Mail List Archive: Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts? (original) (raw)
From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Nov 18 2005 - 08:40:29 CST
Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Strange characters in the Collation Charts"
- Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
At 15:16 +0100 2005-11-18, Andreas Prilop wrote:
>I think it would be useful to be able to specify different
>Arabic scripts like "Simplified" and "Traditional" for Chinese.
>
>Follow the links "Further reading" at
> http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/urdu-alphabet.html
>to learn more.
I do not have time. Read the standard, and if you wish to make a case
for additions to ISO 15924, there is a mechanism for it. In this
instance, just filling out the request form would not be enough.
You'd want to offer more than "I think it would be useful" to help
the committee decide.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
- Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: Strange characters in the Collation Charts"
- Previous message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- In reply to: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5: Fri Nov 18 2005 - 08:52:05 CST