Unicode Mail List Archive: Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts? (original) (raw)
Next message: Tom Gewecke: "Kurdish Questions"
- Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Glottal Fantasy (was: Apostrophes)"
- In reply to: James Kass: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
On 11/19/05, James Kass <jameskass@att.net> wrote:
>
> From: "Philippe Verdy" <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>
>
> > You are rewording the same thing as me, with the same conclusion. a
> > superscript 'e' is still a 'e', not an umlaut.
>
> Asmus Freytag isn't rewording. Fraktur may use umlauts:
> http://www.frakturschrift.com/screenshot1eb.jpg
More strongly, in my experience, virtually all Fraktur German printed
in the 20th century and late 19th were printed with umlauts.
- Next message: Tom Gewecke: "Kurdish Questions"
- Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Glottal Fantasy (was: Apostrophes)"
- In reply to: James Kass: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5: Sat Nov 19 2005 - 13:15:09 CST