Unicode Mail List Archive: RE: Hebrew script in IDN (original) (raw)
From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Nov 22 2005 - 11:06:43 CST
Next message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Reply: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
At 08:28 -0800 2005-11-22, Peter Constable wrote:
>When decomposition mappings were first introduced into Unicode, it was
>decided that any ligature/digraph characters would be given
>compatibility decompositions rather than canonical decompositions. I'm
>not sure what the reasons for that decision were at the time.
Yes, yes, but what does this MEAN for Yiddish?
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
- Next message: Andreas Prilop: "Re: ISO 15924: Different Arabic scripts?"
- Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Reply: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Hebrew script in IDN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5: Tue Nov 22 2005 - 11:20:00 CST