Orthochrysotile (original) (raw)

A structural variant of Chrysotile

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.

Edit Add SynonymEdit CIF structuresClear Cache

Hardness:

2½ - 3

Crystal System:

Orthorhombic

Name:

Named in 1951 by Eric James William Whittaker for being an orthorhombic chrysotile.

A polytype of Chrysotile

Probably not uncommon polytype, but difficult to characterize as intermixed with the more common, monoclinic polytype clinocrysotile.

Originally described from Cuddapah, Chennai (Madras), Andhra Pradesh, India.

Hide all sections | Show all sections

Unique IdentifiersHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Mindat ID:

3025

Long-form identifier:

mindat:1:1:3025:6

GUID
(UUID V4):

811eeed8-da2a-4ad4-97d0-7917db1e278a

IMA Classification of OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

IMA status:

Discredited

Classification of OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Hey's CIM Ref.:

14.4.6

14 : Silicates not Containing Aluminum
4 : Silicates of Mg

Physical Properties of OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Hardness:

2½ - 3 on Mohs scale

Optical Data of OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Type:

Biaxial (-)

RI values:

_n_α = 1.545 - 1.569 _n_β = 1.546 - 1.569 _n_γ = 1.553 - 1.571

2V:

Measured: 20° to 60°

Max Birefringence:

δ = 0.008

Image shows birefringence interference colour range (at 30µm thickness)
and does not take into account mineral colouration.

Surface Relief:

Low

Dispersion:

relatively weak

Crystallography of OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Crystal System:

Orthorhombic

Cell Parameters:

a = 5.34 Å, b = 9.24 Å, c = 14.2 Å

Ratio:

a:b:c = 0.578 : 1 : 1.537

Unit Cell V:

700.65 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Powder Diffraction Data:

d-spacing Intensity
7.36 Å (100)
3.66 Å (80)
1.531 Å (65)
4.56 Å (50)
2.50 Å (50)
2.604 Å (40)
1.310 Å (40)

Other Language Names for OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

German:Orthochrysotil

Other InformationHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Health Risks:

No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

mindat.org URL:

https://www.mindat.org/min-3025.html
Please feel free to link to this page.

Search Engines:

Mineral Dealers:

References for OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

Reference List:

Whittaker, E.J.W. (1956) The structure of chrysotile. III. Orthochrysotile. Acta Crystallographica: 9: 862-864.

Wicks, F.J. and Whittaker, E.J.W. (1975) A reappraisal of the structures of the serpentine minerals. Canadian Mineralogist: 13(3): 227-243.

Burke, Ernst A. J. (2006) A mass discreditation of GQN minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 44 (6) 1557-1560 doi:10.2113/gscanmin.44.6.1557

(2023) Orthochrysotile. Handbook of Mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America

Localities for OrthochrysotileHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.

Locality ListHide

This section is currently hidden. Click the show button to view.

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.

Canada
Québec Estrie Les Sources RCM Val-des-Sources Jeffrey Mine King (n.d.)
China
Jilin Tonghua Ji'an Co. Ji'an Asbestos mine Youqin Li et al. (1981)
East Timor
Manatuto District Hili Manu Lay et al. (2017)
Eswatini
Hhohho Region Bulembu Havelock Mine Canadian Mineralogist (1979)
Hungary
Pest County Szentendre District Dunabogdány Csódi Hill Ferro et al. (2003)
India
Andhra Pradesh Kadapa District (YSR District) Rev. Min. (1988)
Japan
Kumamoto Prefecture Yatsushiro City Izumi Satomi Enju (2018)
Yamaguchi Prefecture Iwakuni City Nishiki-cho Deai serpentinite Motoiki Saito (1973)
Mitake Mitake serpentinite Motoiki Saito (1973)
Norway
Buskerud Kongsberg silver mining district Bancroft et al. (2001)
Poland
Lower Silesian Voivodeship Karkonosze County Kowary Lis et al. (1986)
Sweden
Jönköping County Jönköping Månsarp Smålands Taberg Hans Thulin
Switzerland
Grisons Prättigau/Davos Region Davos Wolfgang Tot Alp Stalder et al. (1998)
USA
Arizona Gila County Salt River Mining District Chrysotile area Victory and Eldorado Mines (Arizona Asbestos Association; Chrysotile Mines; Ash Creek Deposits; Victory Mine; Victory deposit; El Dorado Mine) Tony Nikischer
Salt River Canyon Tony Nikischer
California Calaveras County West Belt New Melones Dam
San Francisco County San Francisco Van Nostrand Reinholt Press: 424. +2 other references
Nevada Eureka County Maggie Creek Mining District Castor et al. (2004)
Nye County Gabbs Mining District Gabbs Sierra Magnesite Mine Castor et al. (2004)
New Jersey Sussex County Franklin Dunn (1995)
Vermont Orleans & Lamoille Cos. Lowell & Eden Belvidere Mountain Quarries Chidester et al. (1978)