Nonlinear Self-focusing in a Fiber (original) (raw)

RP Fiber Power — Simulation and Design Software for Fiber Optics, Amplifiers and Fiber Lasers
Example Case: Nonlinear Self-focusing in a Fiber
Description of the Model
Here, we investigate details of nonlinear self-focusing in a fiber. First, we calculate how the fundamental mode of a large mode area fiber shrinks due to nonlinear self-focusing.
The mode solver actually ignores nonlinear effects. However, with a few lines of script code we can store the refractive index profile including its nonlinear changes and then recalculate the fiber modes. This is repeated until we get a self-consistent solution:
dr := 0.05 um
defarray I[0, 200 um, dr]
n_f_nl(r) := n_f(r) + n2 * (if r <= r_max then I~[r])
{ nonlinear refractive index profile }
store_I(P) :=
for r := 0 to 2 * r_co step dr do
I[r] := P * I_lm(0, 1, lambda, r)
{ ignore index changes outside 2 * r_co, where the intensity is small }
CalcNonlinearMode(P) :=
{ Calculate the lowest-order mode with self-focusing for the power P. }
begin
var A, A_l;
A := 0;
repeat
A_l := A;
store_I(P);
set_n_profile("n_f_nl", r_max);
A := A_eff_lm(0, 1, lambda);
until abs(A_l / A - 1) < 1e-6;
endWe can also numerically simulate the beam propagation, considering the fiber nonlinearity. For that, we need to define a numerical grid and set various other inputs for the beam propagation:
x_max := 30 um { maximum x or y value }
N := 2^7 { number of grid points in x and y direction }
dx := 2 * x_max / N { transverse resolution }
z_max := 30 mm { fiber length }
dz := 100 um { longitudinal resolution }
N_z := z_max / dz { number of z steps }
N_s := 100 { number of sub-steps per dz step }
P_11 := 4 MW
A0%(x, y) := sqrt(P_11) * A_lm_xy(1, 1, lambda, x, y) { initial field }
calc
begin
bp_set_grid(x_max, N, x_max, N, z_max, N_z, N_s);
bp_define_channel(lambda);
bp_set_n('n_f(sqrt(x^2 + y^2))'); { index profile }
bp_set_loss('10e2 * ((x^2 + y^2) / (20 um)^2)^3'); { simulate loss for cladding modes }
bp_set_n2('n2');
bp_set_A0('A0%(x, y)'); { initial amplitude }
bp_set_interpol(2); { quadratic interpolation }
endResults
Figure 1 shows the mode profile for an optical power of 5 MW (not far below the power for catastrophic self-focusing), and the corresponding refractive index profile.
Figure 1: Calculated normalized mode intensity profiles with and without self-focusing.
The refractive index profiles are also shown. One can see that the modification by the nonlinear effect is substantial.
Figure 2 shows the mode area as a function of the optical power. The mode area shrinks dramatically as the critical power is approached.
Figure 2: Mode area versus optical power. The red line indicates the critical power for catastrophic self-focusing.
Figure 3 shows the maximum power as a function of the core radius. For each core radius, one has to calculate the optical power for which the on-axis intensity reaches the damage threshold. Of course, the modes need to be recalculated for each power value.
Figure 3: Maximum optical power in the fiber as a function of the core radius.
Initially, the maximum power scales with the core area. For large cores, however, the rise becomes substantially slower, as the mode area is reduced by self-focusing.
Now we investigate what happens if we inject light into the LP11 mode (the first higher-order mode) of the fiber, as calculated without the nonlinearity. For that, we can use numerical beam propagation. Figure 4 shows the result if we inject an optical power of 4 MW, not far below the critical power for self-focusing. Here, the higher-order mode becomes unstable. Even the slightest asymmetry, here resulting from small numerical errors, causes the mode to transform into a superposition of the LP01 mode and the LP11 mode after about 10 mm of propagation distance:
Figure 4: Amplitude profile in the x-z plane for injection of the LP11 mode as calculated without the nonlinearity.
We can also show the evolution of optical powers in the guided modes:
Figure 5: Evolution of optical powers in the LP11 and LP01 mode.
It may seem surprising that the total power in the guided modes undergoes some oscillations: How can the power increase at some locations, even though we only have some losses (for cladding modes)? One can understand this as an energy exchange with cladding modes, enabled by the fiber's nonlinearity. Note also that the nonlinear interaction couples light into the cladding mode, which would not happen at low optical powers.