Issue 21981: Idle problem - Python tracker (original) (raw)

Created on 2014-07-14 11:52 by Tomk, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (5)
msg223016 - (view) Author: Thomas Kember (Tomk) Date: 2014-07-14 11:52
Hello Terry, Thank you for your explanation of the bug in Idle. I know Idle has limitations, but it is quite adequate for the programming I want to do. I agree that when this error occurs there should only be a warning, so the user can decide what he wants to do about it. There is however one fault in Idle that would be good if it were fixed. That is, it does not show line numbers. Since errors all indicate the line number the error occured, having the line numbers on the listing would be very useful. One other thing. Now the problem is solved but it is still showing status 'open' on the problem site, how do I change the status? Regards, Thomas
msg223018 - (view) Author: Eric V. Smith (eric.smith) * (Python committer) Date: 2014-07-14 12:31
Please respond to the other bug. No need to open a new bug when responding to an existing issue. Thanks.
msg223027 - (view) Author: Thomas Kember (Tomk) Date: 2014-07-14 13:16
Hello Eric V. Smith, I reported only one bug and it has been fixed. I can't find out how I am to reset the status of it to closed. Thomas Kember ________________________________ From: Eric V. Smith <report@bugs.python.org> To: t.kember1@btinternet.com Sent: Monday, 14 July 2014, 13:31 Subject: [] Idle problem Eric V. Smith added the comment: Please respond to the other bug. No need to open a new bug when responding to an existing issue. Thanks. ---------- nosy: +eric.smith resolution:  -> not a bug stage:  -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21981> _______________________________________
msg223028 - (view) Author: Thomas Kember (Tomk) Date: 2014-07-14 13:16
Hello Eric V. Smith, I reported only one bug and it has been fixed. I can't find out how I am to reset the status of it to closed. Thomas Kember ________________________________ From: Eric V. Smith <report@bugs.python.org> To: t.kember1@btinternet.com Sent: Monday, 14 July 2014, 13:31 Subject: [] Idle problem Eric V. Smith added the comment: Please respond to the other bug. No need to open a new bug when responding to an existing issue. Thanks. ---------- nosy: +eric.smith resolution:  -> not a bug stage:  -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21981> _______________________________________
msg223050 - (view) Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * (Python committer) Date: 2014-07-14 19:43
Thomas, PLEASE stop quoting messages when you post by email. Use your mouse selection and delete key. There is an open issue for adding lines numbers in the editor: #17535. It has a patch waiting for review. The bug you reported has not been fixed. Silent Ghost showed you how to work around the problem. Other people have reported the the same problem before, and have been given the same workaround (delete the file), and the problem forgotten about until the next person runs into it. This time the 'next person' was you. But the problem has never been fixed. There should not be a 'next person'. The issue should stay open until the bug is fixed (or I fine a duplicate open issue). The headers are mostly for Python developers. After users make an initial report, they should usually leave them alone.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:05 admin set github: 66180
2019-03-25 08:06:57 terry.reedy set assignee: terry.reedycomponents: + IDLE
2014-07-14 19:43:01 terry.reedy set messages: +
2014-07-14 13:16:32 Tomk set messages: +
2014-07-14 13:16:29 Tomk set messages: +
2014-07-14 12:31:26 eric.smith set status: open -> closednosy: + eric.smithmessages: + resolution: not a bugstage: resolved
2014-07-14 12:19:38 SilentGhost set nosy: + terry.reedy
2014-07-14 11:52:56 Tomk create