| msg53224 - (view) |
Author: Roman Suzi (rnd0110) |
Date: 2001-08-08 18:04 |
| I use rlcompleter extensively in interactive Python mode. I think it could be cool if callable objects were added "(" when completed. This way it will be much faster to program, without looking-up __doc__. For example: >>> f.fil will give: >>> f.fileno(_ ("_" is to mark cursor position) and: >>> f.so will (as before) give: >>> f.softspace _ |
|
|
| msg53225 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) *  |
Date: 2005-07-17 13:15 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=1188172 Any comments on this one? Sounds reasonable to me. |
|
|
| msg53226 - (view) |
Author: Roman Suzi (rnd0110) |
Date: 2006-11-09 06:58 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=287815 Perhaps one needs to propose a patch. Otherwise it will not advance... |
|
|
| msg53227 - (view) |
Author: Roman Suzi (rnd0110) |
Date: 2006-11-09 07:01 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=287815 Wow! The patch is here! Why isn't is accepted into the distribution??? |
|
|
| msg53228 - (view) |
Author: Roman Suzi (rnd0110) |
Date: 2006-11-09 07:57 |
| Logged In: YES user_id=287815 One more illustration: >>> f = open("myfile", "w") >>> f. f.__class__( f.__repr__( f.next( f.__delattr__( f.__setattr__( f.read( f.__doc__ f.__str__( f.readinto( f.__enter__( f.close( f.readline( f.__exit__( f.closed f.readlines( f.__getattribute__( f.encoding f.seek( f.__hash__( f.fileno( f.softspace f.__init__( f.flush( f.tell( f.__iter__( f.isatty( f.truncate( f.__new__( f.mode f.write( f.__reduce__( f.name f.writelines( f.__reduce_ex__( f.newlines f.xreadlines( >>> f. - nice to remember which attributes are methods and which aren't. |
|
|
| msg68547 - (view) |
Author: Manuel Muradás (dieresys) |
Date: 2008-06-21 21:15 |
| Here is a new patch against 2.6. |
|
|
| msg68646 - (view) |
Author: Manuel Muradás (dieresys) |
Date: 2008-06-23 20:29 |
| I have also updated the rlcompleter documentation. Here is the complete patch. rlcompleterAndDoc2.6.diff |
|
|
| msg68695 - (view) |
Author: Roman Suzi (rnd0110) |
Date: 2008-06-24 17:35 |
| Thanks for the patch! However, I do not understand if it ever gets included into Python or remains always for those who find it? (I do not believe this small change is somehow PEPable, but how it gets included then?) |
|
|
| msg68696 - (view) |
Author: Guilherme Polo (gpolo) * |
Date: 2008-06-24 17:56 |
| This is nearly good. But I have some notes: you don't need to import operator here, just use the built-in callable; stick to <80 columns; leave a space after a comma. |
|
|
| msg68697 - (view) |
Author: Manuel Muradás (dieresys) |
Date: 2008-06-24 18:42 |
| Guilherme, Thanks a lot for taking some time to review my patch. Here is a new version. Please take another look and tell me what do you think about it. Thanks again |
|
|
| msg68698 - (view) |
Author: Guilherme Polo (gpolo) * |
Date: 2008-06-24 18:53 |
| On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Manuel Muradás <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Manuel Muradás <mmuradas@dieresys.com.ar> added the comment: > > Guilherme, > Thanks a lot for taking some time to review my patch. > Here is a new version. > > Please take another look and tell me what do you think about it. > Thanks again That is good to be applied now. > > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10721/rlcompleter2.6.diff > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue449227> > _______________________________________ > |
|
|
| msg69107 - (view) |
Author: Facundo Batista (facundobatista) * |
Date: 2008-07-02 16:53 |
| Fixed in 64664. Thank you everybody! |
|
|
| msg69906 - (view) |
Author: Antoine Pitrou (pitrou) * |
Date: 2008-07-17 20:42 |
| This issue caused a regression in #3396. |
|
|