Fourth Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison (original) (raw)
For people, who make real research in field of high-end video compression and professionally use videocodecs
MSU Graphics & Media Lab (Video Group)
Project head: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin Testing, charts, analysis: Dmitriy Kulikov, Alexander Parshin
Codecs that Were Tested
- XviD (MPEG-4 ASP codec)
- MainConcept H.264
- Intel H.264
- x264
- AMD H.264
- Artemis H.264
Comparison Rules
- All codec options and presets were provided by codec authors
- An important restriction on a preset is encoding time for it. A few iterations of compliance testing and preset optimization were made to meet the requirements.
- JM 9.8 reference decoder was used to decode all encoded streams.
- All objective metrics measurements were performed with MSU Video Quality Measurement Tool (Pro Version)
- For each preset both speed and quality were measured
Comparison Content
- Following metrics were measured:
- PSNR (Y component)
- SSIM (Y component)
- Codecs were analyzed separately in the following types of application:
- "Video Conferences"
- "Movies"
- "HDTV"
Individual codecs' settings were used for each of those application types. - Video sequences that were used in this comparison:
- "Salesman" (standard sequence)
- "Foreman" (standard sequence)
- "News" (standard sequence)
- "Battle" (part of "Terminator-2" movie)
- "Smith" (part of "Mr. and Mrs. Smith")
- "Iceage" (part of "Ice Age")
- "lord of the rings" (part of "Lord of the Rings")
- "Troy" (part of "Troy" HDTV movie)
- "Matrix" (part of "The matrix" HDTV movie)
Different Comparison Versions
Short version of report is now available at website for free download (70 pages, 76 figures). There are three customized versions:
- Free Version
- Base analysis for Movie usage area
- RD curves
- Relative Bitrate/Relative Speed graphs
- Absolute encoding speed charts
- Bitrate handling graphs
- Short analysis for Video Conferences and HDTV (only average graphs)
- Some common analysis for all the usage areas
- PSNR as objective quality metric
- Advanced Users Edition (Free now!)
- All from Free Version
- RD curves for all the usage areas
- Relative Bitrate/Relative Speed graphs individually for all the usage areas
- Some interesting per-frame comparison
- Absolute encoding speed charts for all the usage areas
- Bitrate handling graphs for all the usage areas
- Enterprise (Pro) Edition (Free now!)
- All from Advanced Users Edition
- All sequences for all the usage areas
- SSIM RD curves individually for each sequence from all the sequences
- Relative Bitrate/Relative Speed graphs individually for each sequence from test set
- Per-frame analysis
- Specific Analysis Methods (Synthetic sequences)
All sequences, used in this comparison are provided with Pro version of report.
You can download or purchase any version in Download section.
Download & Contribution
Dear video codec professionals!
You can support this comparison by buying Professional Edition of the report or ordering the customized versions of our report. This contribution will help us:
To continue this comparison without any participation fees (this is important for x264 and XviD AVC next year)
- To avoid comparison sponsorship by codecs' developers
- To keep comparison detailed and useful Thank you for your contribution in advance!
Fourth Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison | ||
---|---|---|
Free Version | 70 pages, 76 figures | Download PDF (2.14 Mb) |
Advanced User Edition | 96 pages, 106 figures More graphs, more analysis, more sequences | Download PDF (1.9 Mb) or support us by purchasing |
Enterprise (Pro) Edition | 162 pages, 213 figures All the graphs, all the types of analysis, all the sequences | Download PDF (2.0 Mb) or support us by purchasing |
If you have a discount code please use this form (if you are a member of scientific/academic organization, please contact us).
See also previous Third Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison:
Thanks
Special thanks to the following contributors of our current comparison
Special thanks to the following contributors of our previous comparisons
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
---|
Contact Information
See all MSU Video Codecs Comparisons
MSU video codecs comparisons resources:
- Introduction to Video Codecs Comparison
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2004 (October 2004)
- MPEG-4 SP/ASP Video Codecs Comparison (March 2005)
- JPEG 2000 Image Codecs Comparison (September 2005)
- First Annual MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264 Video Codecs Comparison (January 2005)
- Second Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison (December 2005)
- Subjective Comparison of Modern Video Codecs (February 2006)
- MPEG-2 Video Decoders Comparison (May 2006)
- WMP and JPEG2000 Comparison (October 2006)
- Third Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2006) (All versions for free!)
- Lossless Video Codecs Comparison 2007 (March 2007)
- Fourth Annual MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (December 2007) (All versions for free!)
- Options Analysis of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Codec x264 (December 2008)
- Fifth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2009) (All versions for free!)
- Sixth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2010)
- Seventh MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2011)
- Eighth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (May 2012)
- Ninth MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Comparison (Dec 2013)
- Tenth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Oct 2015)
- Eleventh Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2016)
- Twelfth Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2017)
- Thirteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Aug 2018)
- Fourteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Sept 2019)
- Cloud Encoding Servoces Comparison 2019 (Dec 2019)
- Fifteen Video Codec Comparison (HEVC) (Dec 2020)
- Sixteen Video Codec Comparison (Dec 2021)
- Seventeen Video Codecs Comparisons (Nov 2022)
- Eighteenth Video Codecs Comparisons (Apr 2025)
- Nineteenth Video Codecs Comparisons (2025)
- Codec Analysis for Companies:
Other Materials
Last updated: 28-May-2025
Server size: 8069 files, 1215Mb (Server statistics)
Project updated by Server Team and MSU Video Group
Project sponsored by YUVsoft Corp.
Project supported by MSU Graphics & Media Lab