Barrett v. United States (original) (raw)
- Barrett v. United States, 169 U.S. 218 (1898), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that South Carolina had never effectively been subdivided into separate judicial districts. Therefore, it was held, a criminal defendant allegedly tried in one district for a crime committed in the other had in fact been permissibly been tried in a separate division of a single district. (en)
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/218/
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep169/usrep169218/usrep169218.pdf
- 21994352 (xsd:integer)
- 9956 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1038509549 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Savannah,_Georgia
- dbr:Boston
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law
- dbr:Judiciary_Act_of_1789
- dbr:Pennsylvania
- dbr:Richmond,_Virginia
- dbr:United_States_Congress
- dbr:United_States_Constitution
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_South_Carolina
- dbr:United_States_Marshals_Service
- dbr:Defendant
- dbr:Desk
- dbr:Letterhead
- dbr:Pendleton_District,_South_Carolina
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Columbia,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Conspiracy_(crime)
- dbr:Melville_Fuller
- dbr:Chester_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Newberry_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Clerk_of_the_court
- dbr:Encyclopedia
- dbr:Federal_Reporter
- dbr:Post_office
- dbr:Mail_order
- dbr:Spartanburg_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Augusta,_Georgia
- dbr:Baltimore
- dbc:1898_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court
- dbr:Washington,_D.C.
- dbr:William_H._Brawley
- dbr:Jury
- dbr:Lancaster_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Laurens_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Alaska
- dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_case_law
- dbc:1898_in_South_Carolina
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_venue_case_law
- dbr:Fairfield_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Greenville_County,_South_Carolina
- dbc:Legal_history_of_South_Carolina
- dbr:Atlanta
- dbr:Abbeville_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Charlotte,_North_Carolina
- dbr:Chicago
- dbr:Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States
- dbr:L._Ed.
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Edgefield_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:York_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Piano
- dbr:South_Carolina
- dbr:Spartanburg,_South_Carolina
- dbr:New_Jersey
- dbr:New_York_City
- dbr:Organ_(music)
- dbr:Safe
- dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Union_County,_South_Carolina
- dbr:United_States_Attorney
- dbr:United_States_district_court
- dbr:Vicinage_Clause
- dbr:United_States_federal_judge
- dbr:United_States_circuit_court
- dbr:File:South_Carolina_-_Barrett_map.JPG
- dbr:Matheson_v._United_States
- 0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1898 (xsd:integer)
- Barrett v. United States, (en)
- 0001-02-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1898 (xsd:integer)
- Barrett v. United States (en)
- South Carolina had not been divided into separate federal judicial districts. (en)
- unanimous (en)
- U.S. Const., Art. III, ยง 2, cl. 3. and Amend. VI. (en)
- Barrett v. United States (en)
- 18 (xsd:integer)
- United States v. Barrett et al., 65 F. 62 (en)
- none (en)
- 218 (xsd:integer)
- 169 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:Wikisource-inline
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:USArticleIII
- dbt:USDistCourts
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1898_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Fuller_Court
- dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_case_law
- dbc:1898_in_South_Carolina
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_venue_case_law
- dbc:Legal_history_of_South_Carolina
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Barrett v. United States, 169 U.S. 218 (1898), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that South Carolina had never effectively been subdivided into separate judicial districts. Therefore, it was held, a criminal defendant allegedly tried in one district for a crime committed in the other had in fact been permissibly been tried in a separate division of a single district. (en)
- Barrett v. United States (en)
- freebase:Barrett v. United States
- yago-res:Barrett v. United States
- wikidata:Barrett v. United States
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4VqrF
- (en)
- Barrett v. United States (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Barrett_v._U.S.
- dbr:Barrett_v._US
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_169
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Fuller_Court
- dbr:List_of_former_United_States_district_courts
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_South_Carolina
- dbr:169_U.S._218
- dbr:169_US_218
- dbr:Barrett
- dbr:Barrett_v_United_States
is foaf:primaryTopic of