Blakely v. Washington (original) (raw)
- Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), held that, in the context of mandatory sentencing guidelines under state law, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences based on facts other than those decided by the jury or admitted by the defendant. The landmark nature of the case was alluded to by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who characterized the decision as a "Number 10 earthquake". (en)
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/542/296/
- https://web.archive.org/web/20060923115559/http:/www.ussc.gov/STATES/blakely.htm
- https://web.archive.org/web/20170216142300/https:/www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/02-1632.pdf
- https://www.aclu.org/scotus/2003/13837lgl20040106.html
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep542/usrep542296/usrep542296.pdf
- http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/930c1929a542698485256ec4005673c7/4aad1e2414222dd685256ec400569992/$FILE/Blakely_NACDL_amicus2.pdf
- https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2018/12/03/18-35647.pdf
- http://sentencing.typepad.com
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/542/296.html
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/02-1632.ZS.html
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/case/%3Fcase=2000-2009/2003/2003_02_1632
- http://www.usdoj.gov/dag/readingroom/blakely.htm
- 772474 (xsd:integer)
- 20199 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1072685013 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:California_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Question_of_fact
- dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
- dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_sentencing_case_law
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_542
- dbr:United_States_v._Booker
- dbr:Defendant
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Crime
- dbr:Grant_County,_Washington
- dbr:Montana
- dbr:Moses_Lake,_Washington
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbr:Apprendi_v._New_Jersey
- dbr:Stephen_Breyer
- dbr:State_law
- dbr:Three_Forks,_Montana
- dbr:Jury
- dbr:Washington_court_system
- dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Cunningham_v._California
- dbr:Judge
- dbr:Washington_Court_of_Appeals
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:Jury_trial
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Mitigating_factor
- dbr:Ohio_State_University
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Sentence_(law)
- dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:United_States_Sentencing_Commission
- dbr:Mandatory_sentencing
- dbr:Washington_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Pacific_Reporter
- dbr:Federal_Sentencing_Guidelines
- dbr:United_States_v._Fanfan
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- dbr:People_v._Black
- 0001-03-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2004 (xsd:integer)
- Blakely v. Washington, (en)
- 0001-06-24 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2004 (xsd:integer)
- Kennedy (en)
- O'Connor (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Ralph Howard Blakely, Jr. v. Washington (en)
- The State of Washington's criminal sentencing system violated the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, because it gave judges the ability to increase sentences based on their own determination of facts. (en)
- O'Connor (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Breyer; Rehnquist, Kennedy (en)
- Stevens, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg (en)
- U.S. Const. amend. VI; Washington Sentencing Reform Act (en)
- Blakely v. Washington (en)
- Scalia (en)
- 172800.0
- 25920.0
- Rehearing denied, 125 S. Ct. 21 (en)
- 296 (xsd:integer)
- 542 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_sentencing_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), held that, in the context of mandatory sentencing guidelines under state law, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences based on facts other than those decided by the jury or admitted by the defendant. The landmark nature of the case was alluded to by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who characterized the decision as a "Number 10 earthquake". (en)
- Blakely v. Washington (en)
- freebase:Blakely v. Washington
- yago-res:Blakely v. Washington
- wikidata:Blakely v. Washington
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/eQFL
- (en)
- Ralph Howard Blakely, Jr. v. Washington (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Rock_v._Arkansas
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_ca...ing_constitutional_criminal_procedure
- dbr:List_of_University_of_Michigan_Law_School_alumni
- dbr:Hurst_v._Florida
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court
- dbr:Rita_v._United_States
- dbr:United_States_v._Booker
- dbr:Dwight_Watson_(farmer)
- dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Mistretta_v._United_States
- dbr:Blakeley
- dbr:Blakely_v_Washington
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbr:Apprendi_v._New_Jersey
- dbr:Stinson_v._United_States
- dbr:Juries_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Jury
- dbr:542_U.S._296
- dbr:Cunningham_v._California
- dbr:Fair_Sentencing_Act
- dbr:United_States_Federal_Sentencing_Guidelines
- dbr:Jeffrey_L._Fisher
- dbr:Jury_trial
- dbr:Killing_of_Daunte_Wright
- dbr:Oregon_v._Ice
- dbr:Rachel_Barkow
- dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Olan_Jermaine_Williams_Vs._State_of_Oregon
- dbr:United_States_courts_of_appeals
- dbr:United_States_federal_probation_and_supervised_release
is foaf:primaryTopic of