Christensen v. Harris County (original) (raw)
- Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000), is a Supreme Court of the United States case holding that a county's policy of requiring employees to schedule time off to avoid accruing time off was not prohibited by the Fair Labor Standards Act. (en)
- https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/158/241/544796/
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/529/576/
- https://www.oyez.org/advocates/f/m/michael_p_fleming
- https://www.oyez.org/advocates/l/m/michael_t_leibig
- https://www.oyez.org/advocates/r/m/matthew_d_roberts
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/98-1167
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep529/usrep529576/usrep529576.pdf
- 19316654 (xsd:integer)
- 16059 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1063285323 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_529
- dbr:United_States_Department_of_Labor
- dbr:United_States_Solicitor_of_Labor
- dbr:United_States_v._Mead_Corp.
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_labor_case_law
- dbc:Harris_County,_Texas
- dbr:Skidmore_v._Swift_&_Co.
- dbr:Wage_and_Hour_Division
- dbr:5th_Cir.
- dbr:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act_of_1938
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:Harris_County,_Texas
- dbc:2000_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Michael_P._Fleming
- dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume
- dbr:Chevron_deference
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:Stevens_J
- dbr:U.S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
- 0001-02-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2000 (xsd:integer)
- Christensen v. Harris County, (en)
- Souter (en)
- Scalia (en)
- 0001-05-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2000 (xsd:integer)
- Stevens (en)
- Breyer (en)
- Edward Christensen, et al. v. Harris County, et al. (en)
- An opinion letter from the Department of Labor, stating that an employer had to get the employee to agree before the employee had to schedule time off, did not receive Chevron deference and instead should receive the less deferential standard of Skidmore v. Swift. (en)
- Ginsburg (en)
- Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
- Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter; Scalia (en)
- Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.S. ยง 201 et seq. (en)
- Christensen v. Harris County (en)
- Thomas (en)
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
- 25920.0 (dbd:second)
- 576 (xsd:integer)
- 529 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_labor_case_law
- dbc:Harris_County,_Texas
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbc:2000_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000), is a Supreme Court of the United States case holding that a county's policy of requiring employees to schedule time off to avoid accruing time off was not prohibited by the Fair Labor Standards Act. (en)
- Christensen v. Harris County (en)
- freebase:Christensen v. Harris County
- yago-res:Christensen v. Harris County
- wikidata:Christensen v. Harris County
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4hqF2
- (en)
- Edward Christensen, et al. v. Harris County, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:Christensen_v_Harris_County
- dbr:Skidmore_v._Swift_&_Co.
- dbr:529_U.S._576
- dbr:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act_of_1938
- dbr:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
- dbr:Michael_P._Fleming
is foaf:primaryTopic of