Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana (original) (raw)
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, 453 U.S. 609 (1981), is a 6-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that a severance tax in Montana does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. (en)
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8289767766768895663
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/453/609/case.html
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep453/usrep453609/usrep453609.pdf
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/453/609.html
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/110563/commonwealth-edison-co-v-montana/
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/877181/commonwealth-edison-co-v-state/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/1980/80-581
- 24233438 (xsd:integer)
- 21480 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1045042087 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:Coal_mining_in_the_United_States
- dbc:Montana_state_case_law
- dbr:Potter_Stewart
- dbr:Montana_District_Courts
- dbr:Montana_State_Government
- dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:United_States_Constitution
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Complete_Auto_Transit,_Inc._v._Brady
- dbr:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
- dbr:Montana
- dbr:Montana_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Constitutionality
- dbr:Thomas_Lee_Judge
- dbr:Lewis_and_Clark_County,_Montana
- dbr:Lignite
- dbc:1981_in_Montana
- dbc:Taxation_in_Montana
- dbr:Colonialism
- dbr:Commerce_Clause
- dbr:Commonwealth_Edison
- dbr:Supremacy_Clause
- dbr:Sub-bituminous_coal
- dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law
- dbr:Byron_White
- dbc:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law
- dbc:Ecotax
- dbr:Thurgood_Marshall
- dbr:William_Rehnquist
- dbr:Crow_Nation
- dbc:Severance_taxes
- dbc:Exelon
- dbr:Harry_Blackmun
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
- dbc:Mining_in_Montana
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Coal_mining
- dbr:Economic_development
- dbr:Midwestern_United_States
- dbr:OPEC
- dbr:RAND_Corporation
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Severance_tax
- dbr:Warren_Burger
- dbr:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
- dbr:List_of_Governors_of_Montana
- dbr:Utility_company
- dbr:P.2d
- dbr:John_P._Stevens
- dbr:Montana_State_Legislature
- dbr:National_Academies_of_Science
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- dbr:Heisler_v._Thomas_Colliery_Co.
- dbr:Mid-Northern_Oil_Co._v._Walker
- dbr:Montana_v._Crow_Tribe_of_Indians
- dbr:National_Bellas_Hess,_Inc._v._Illinois_Revenue_Dept.
- dbr:National_Geographic_Society_v._California_Board_of_Equalization
- dbr:Standard_Pressed_Steel_Co._v._Washington_Revenue_Dept.
- dbr:Western_Live_Stock_v._Bureau_of_Revenue
- 0001-03-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1981 (xsd:integer)
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, (en)
- White (en)
- 0001-07-02 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1981 (xsd:integer)
- Blackmun (en)
- Commonwealth Edison Company, et al. v. Montana, et al. (en)
- The Montana severance tax does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause. (en)
- Powell, Stevens (en)
- Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Rehnquist (en)
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. Montana (en)
- Marshall (en)
- 172800.0 (dbd:second)
- 17280.0 (dbd:second)
- Rehearing denied, . (en)
- 609 (xsd:integer)
- 453 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:Coal_mining_in_the_United_States
- dbc:Montana_state_case_law
- dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1981_in_Montana
- dbc:Taxation_in_Montana
- dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law
- dbc:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law
- dbc:Ecotax
- dbc:Severance_taxes
- dbc:Exelon
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
- dbc:Mining_in_Montana
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana, 453 U.S. 609 (1981), is a 6-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that a severance tax in Montana does not violate the Commerce Clause or the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. (en)
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana (en)
- freebase:Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
- yago-res:Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
- wikidata:Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4hbYZ
- (en)
- Commonwealth Edison Company, et al. v. Montana, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Environmental_tax
- dbr:Complete_Auto_Transit,_Inc._v._Brady
- dbr:Montana
- dbr:Commonwealth_Edison
- dbr:Supremacy_Clause
- dbr:453_U.S._609
- dbr:Commonwealth_Edison_Co._v_Montana
is foaf:primaryTopic of