Supremacy Clause (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

La deuxième clause de l'article VI de la Constitution américaine, plus communément désignée sous le nom de clause de suprématie, statue que la Constitution des États-Unis, ainsi que les lois et traités adoptés par le gouvernement fédéral, constituent « la loi suprême de la nation » (« the supreme law of the land » en anglais). Cela signifie que les États des États-Unis ne sont pas souverains et qu'en dernier recours, c'est toujours l'autorité de l'Union qui prime sur la constitution et les lois de chacun des États de l'Union.

Property Value
dbo:abstract The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law. However, federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The Supremacy Clause is essentially a conflict-of-laws rule specifying that certain federal acts take priority over any state acts that conflict with federal law. Some jurists further argue that the clause also nullifies federal law that is in conflict with the Constitution, although this is disputed. The Supremacy Clause follows Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, the predecessor of the Constitution, which provided that "Every State shall abide by the determination of the [Congress], on all questions which by this confederation are submitted to them." As a constitutional provision announcing the supremacy of federal law, the Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority, albeit only when that authority is expressed in the Constitution itself; no matter what the federal or state governments might wish to do, they must stay within the boundaries of the Constitution. Consequently, the Supremacy Clause is considered a cornerstone of the United States' federal political structure. (en) La deuxième clause de l'article VI de la Constitution américaine, plus communément désignée sous le nom de clause de suprématie, statue que la Constitution des États-Unis, ainsi que les lois et traités adoptés par le gouvernement fédéral, constituent « la loi suprême de la nation » (« the supreme law of the land » en anglais). Cela signifie que les États des États-Unis ne sont pas souverains et qu'en dernier recours, c'est toujours l'autorité de l'Union qui prime sur la constitution et les lois de chacun des États de l'Union. (fr) La clausola di supremazia dell'Articolo VI della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti d'America, è il principio che stabilisce che la Costituzione, le leggi federali emanate in virtù di essa e i trattati stipulati sotto la sua autorità, costituiscano la "legge suprema dello Stato", e quindi assumano priorità su qualsiasi legge in diretto conflitto emanata dagli Stati federati degli Stati Uniti d'America. La clausola di supremazia prevede che i tribunali degli Stati federati siano vincolati, e che le loro costituzioni siano subordinate, alla legge suprema federale. Tuttavia, le leggi e i trattati federali possono avvalersi della clausola di supremazia solo se non violano la Costituzione. Alla sola magistratura federale spetta il potere e compito di interpretare la Costituzione e l'autorità di giudicare le leggi federali in fatto di costituzionalità. (it) Клаузула о верховенстве (англ. Supremacy Clause) — формулировка в Конституции США, предусматривающая, что конституция и законы Соединённых Штатов, а также международные договоры, заключённые Соединёнными Штатами, являются верховным правом страны. Клаузула также обязывает судей штатов руководствоваться Конституцией, законами и международными договорами США, даже если конституции и законы отдельных штатов противоречат федеральному праву. Конституции штатов также признают верховенство федеральной Конституции США. Так, ныне действующая Конституция Калифорнии 1879 года указывает: «Штат Калифорния составляет неотъемлемую часть Американского Союза, и Конституция Соединённых Штатов является высшим законом страны». Клаузула содержится в статье VI Конституции США. Заключённый в ней принцип верховенства федерального права является одним из краеугольных в федеративной системе США. (ru) 至高條款(Supremacy Clause)是在美國憲法第六條第二款的條款。此條款明確表示了憲法、聯邦法律及美國對外條約為「全國之最高法律」("the supreme law of the land")。此條款確立它們為美國法律體系的最高層次法律,強制各州法官捍衛它們,即使它們抵觸州憲法及州法律。 (zh)
dbo:wikiPageID 33730953 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 27866 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1124762300 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Canadian_constitutional_law dbr:State_governments_of_the_United_States dbr:Judicial_review dbr:Judiciary_Act_of_1789 dbr:Pennsylvania dbr:Pennsylvania_v._Nelson dbr:Reid_v._Covert dbr:United_States_Bill_of_Rights dbr:United_States_Senate dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbr:Intergovernmental_immunity_(United_States) dbr:International_law dbr:Interposition dbr:Commonwealth_Edison_Co._v._Montana dbr:Congress_of_the_Confederation dbr:Constitution_of_Australia dbr:Constitution_of_the_United_States dbr:Cooper_v._Aaron dbr:Crosby_v._National_Foreign_Trade_Council dbr:Maryland dbr:McCulloch_v._Maryland dbr:Medellín_v._Texas dbr:Medical_Device_Regulation_Act dbr:Self-executing_right dbr:1994_California_Proposition_187 dbr:Chy_Lung_v._Freeman dbr:Cohens_v._Virginia dbr:Missouri_v._Holland dbr:Regulatory_agencies dbc:Legal_history_of_the_United_States dbr:Luther_Martin dbr:Federal_preemption dbr:Federalist_No._33 dbr:Federalist_No._44 dbr:Fugitive_Slave_Act dbr:State_constitution_(United_States) dbr:State_court_(United_States) dbr:State_law_(United_States) dbr:States'_rights dbr:Sub-bituminous_coal dbr:Brown_v._Board_of_Education dbc:Clauses_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:U.S._state dbr:Ware_v._Hylton dbr:Wisconsin dbr:Law_of_the_United_States dbr:Supermajority dbr:Notes_of_Debates_in_the_Federal_Convention_of_1787 dbr:Ableman_v._Booth dbr:Alexander_Hamilton dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Food_and_Drug_Administration dbr:Paramountcy_(Canada) dbr:Enumerated_powers dbr:Judicial_interpretation dbr:Legislation dbr:Prescription_drug dbr:Primacy_of_European_Union_law dbr:Head_Money_Cases dbr:James_Madison dbr:State_of_Montana dbr:Arkansas dbr:Articles_of_Confederation dbr:Advice_and_consent dbr:John_Marshall dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Treaty dbr:Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Marbury_v._Madison dbr:Martin_v._Hunter's_Lessee dbr:Section_109_of_the_Constitution_of_Australia dbr:United_States_Code dbr:Necessary_and_Proper_Clause dbr:New_Jersey_Plan dbr:European_Union_law dbr:Treaty_Clause dbr:Utility_company dbr:Conflict-of-laws dbr:Commonwealth_Edison_Company dbr:California_v._ARC_America_Corp. dbr:Edgar_v._MITE_Corp. dbr:LULAC_v._Wilson dbr:Villas_at_Parkside_Partners_v._City_of_Farmers_Branch
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_American_English dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Ussc dbt:US_Constitution dbt:United_States_constitutional_law
dcterms:subject dbc:Legal_history_of_the_United_States dbc:Clauses_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution
rdfs:comment La deuxième clause de l'article VI de la Constitution américaine, plus communément désignée sous le nom de clause de suprématie, statue que la Constitution des États-Unis, ainsi que les lois et traités adoptés par le gouvernement fédéral, constituent « la loi suprême de la nation » (« the supreme law of the land » en anglais). Cela signifie que les États des États-Unis ne sont pas souverains et qu'en dernier recours, c'est toujours l'autorité de l'Union qui prime sur la constitution et les lois de chacun des États de l'Union. (fr) 至高條款(Supremacy Clause)是在美國憲法第六條第二款的條款。此條款明確表示了憲法、聯邦法律及美國對外條約為「全國之最高法律」("the supreme law of the land")。此條款確立它們為美國法律體系的最高層次法律,強制各州法官捍衛它們,即使它們抵觸州憲法及州法律。 (zh) The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws. It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law. However, federal statutes and treaties must be within the parameters of the Constitution; that is, they must be pursuant to the federal government's enumerated powers, and not violate other constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights—of particular interest is the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which states that the federal government has only those powers delegat (en) La clausola di supremazia dell'Articolo VI della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti d'America, è il principio che stabilisce che la Costituzione, le leggi federali emanate in virtù di essa e i trattati stipulati sotto la sua autorità, costituiscano la "legge suprema dello Stato", e quindi assumano priorità su qualsiasi legge in diretto conflitto emanata dagli Stati federati degli Stati Uniti d'America. La clausola di supremazia prevede che i tribunali degli Stati federati siano vincolati, e che le loro costituzioni siano subordinate, alla legge suprema federale. (it) Клаузула о верховенстве (англ. Supremacy Clause) — формулировка в Конституции США, предусматривающая, что конституция и законы Соединённых Штатов, а также международные договоры, заключённые Соединёнными Штатами, являются верховным правом страны. Клаузула также обязывает судей штатов руководствоваться Конституцией, законами и международными договорами США, даже если конституции и законы отдельных штатов противоречат федеральному праву. Конституции штатов также признают верховенство федеральной Конституции США. Так, ныне действующая Конституция Калифорнии 1879 года указывает: «Штат Калифорния составляет неотъемлемую часть Американского Союза, и Конституция Соединённых Штатов является высшим законом страны». Клаузула содержится в статье VI Конституции США. Заключённый в ней принцип верховенс (ru)
rdfs:label Clause de suprématie (États-Unis) (fr) Clausola di supremazia (it) Supremacy Clause (en) Клаузула о верховенстве (ru) 至高條款 (zh)
owl:sameAs freebase:Supremacy Clause wikidata:Supremacy Clause dbpedia-fr:Supremacy Clause dbpedia-it:Supremacy Clause dbpedia-ru:Supremacy Clause dbpedia-zh:Supremacy Clause https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4viuM
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Supremacy_Clause?oldid=1124762300&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Supremacy_Clause
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of dbr:Supremacy
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:Supremacy_clause dbr:Supremacy_Clause_(United_States_Constitution) dbr:Supremacy_Clause_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Supremacy_of_National_Law dbr:Supreme_Law_of_the_Land dbr:Supreme_law_of_the_land dbr:Legal_supremacy
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Presidency_of_George_Washington dbr:Prigg_v._Pennsylvania dbr:Protection_of_Lawful_Commerce_in_Arms_Act dbr:Puerto_Rican_citizenship_and_nationality dbr:Sandra_Lynch dbr:Environmental_tax dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law dbr:2008_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas dbr:2008_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Paul_Stevens dbr:2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Anthony_Kennedy dbr:2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Antonin_Scalia dbr:2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Roberts dbr:2011_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Roberts dbr:2011_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Stephen_Breyer dbr:Block_Island_Wind_Farm dbr:Bonito_Boats,_Inc._v._Thunder_Craft_Boats,_Inc. dbr:Davis_v._Michigan dbr:De_Veau_v._Braisted dbr:Hollywood_Burbank_Airport dbr:Jon_Bruning dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_112 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_302 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Pennsylvania_v._Nelson dbr:Perez_v._Campbell dbr:United_Nations_Convention_on_Contracts_for_the_International_Sale_of_Goods dbr:United_States_invasion_of_Panama dbr:United_States_v._Forty-Three_Gallons_of_Whiskey dbr:United_States_v._Locke dbr:United_States_v._Texas_(2021) dbr:United_States_v._The_Amistad dbr:United_States_v._Washington_(2022) dbr:Carey_R._Dunne dbr:Incorporation_of_international_law dbr:Indirect_land_use_change_impacts_of_biofuels dbr:Intergovernmental_immunity_(United_States) dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:List_of_national_legal_systems dbr:Northern_Mariana_citizenship_and_nationality dbr:1990_Arkansas_Amendment_3 dbr:Commonwealth_Edison_Co._v._Montana dbr:Confederate_States_of_America dbr:Constitution_of_California dbr:Constitution_of_Florida dbr:Constitution_of_Wisconsin dbr:Constitution_of_the_Confederate_States dbr:Constitution_of_the_United_States dbr:Constitutional_Convention_(United_States) dbr:Controlled_Substances_Act dbr:Convention_(meeting) dbr:Convention_Relating_to_the_Status_of_Refugees dbr:Cooper_v._Aaron dbr:Crosby_v._National_Foreign_Trade_Council dbr:Matthew_Whitaker dbr:McCulloch_v._Maryland dbr:Low-carbon_fuel_standard dbr:National_Security_Law_of_the_United_States dbr:Nullification_(U.S._Constitution) dbr:Private_prison dbr:Subsidiarity dbr:Racism_against_African_Americans dbr:Timeline_of_the_Donald_Trump_presidency_(2017_Q1) dbr:Cohens_v._Virginia dbr:Edward_Lodge dbr:Edward_V._Whiton dbr:Entergy_Louisiana,_Inc._v._Louisiana_Public_Service_Commission dbr:Gade_v._National_Solid_Wastes_Management_Ass'n dbr:Garcia_v._San_Antonio_Metropolitan_Transit_Authority dbr:Gibbons_v._Ogden dbr:Goldstein_v._California dbr:Gonzales_v._Raich dbr:Miranda_Du dbr:Missouri_v._Jenkins dbr:Modern_capitalist_society dbr:Murphy_v._National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association dbr:Mutual_Pharmaceutical_Co._v._Bartlett dbr:Constitution_of_New_York dbr:Constitution_of_North_Carolina dbr:Constitution_of_Virginia dbr:Constitution_of_West_Virginia dbr:Constitution_of_the_Republic_of_Bashkortostan dbr:2017_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas dbr:2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Brett_Kavanaugh dbr:2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas dbr:2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_John_Roberts dbr:2019_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Samuel_Alito dbr:Antoine_v._Washington dbr:Arizona_SB_1070 dbr:Lee_Bright dbr:Liberalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Lon_Horiuchi dbr:Magna_Carta dbr:Shooting_of_Bijan_Ghaisar dbr:Zeran_v._America_Online,_Inc. dbr:Federal_and_state_environmental_relations dbr:Federal_enclave dbr:Federal_law dbr:Federal_preemption dbr:Federalist_No._33 dbr:Sovereign_citizen_movement dbr:States'_rights dbr:Supremacy dbr:Massachusetts_Burma_Law dbr:Brulotte_v._Thys_Co. dbr:Tom_Parker_(judge) dbr:Trail_of_Tears dbr:Trump_v._Vance dbr:Twenty-first_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:U.S._state dbr:Ware_v._Hylton dbr:Waterfowl_hunting dbr:Williamson_v._Mazda_Motor_of_America,_Inc. dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:Justin_Butterfield dbr:Law_of_the_land dbr:Nixon_v._Missouri_Municipal_League dbr:Separation_of_church_and_state_in_the_United_States dbr:2014_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Antonin_Scalia dbr:2014_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:2014_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Stephen_Breyer dbr:2016_Massachusetts_Question_3 dbr:2022_California_Proposition_1 dbr:A_Disquisition_on_Government dbr:Ableman_v._Booth dbr:Abortion_in_the_United_States dbr:Abortion_law_in_the_United_States_by_state dbr:Abram_D._Smith dbr:Adrian_Wyllie dbr:Airport_privacy dbr:D'Emden_v_Pedder dbr:Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins dbr:Ex_parte_Quirin dbr:Ex_parte_Young dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Felder_v._Casey dbr:Flood_v._Kuhn dbr:Four_Corners_Generating_Station dbr:Bank_of_the_United_States_v._Deveaux dbr:Bricker_Amendment dbr:Nikki_Haley dbr:Pacific_Gas_&_Electric_Co._v._State_En...Conservation_&_Development_Commission dbr:Judicial_review_in_the_United_States dbr:Kentucky_and_Virginia_Resolutions dbr:Kimble_v._Marvel_Entertainment,_LLC dbr:William_T._Dzurilla dbr:Primacy_of_European_Union_law dbr:Guamanian_citizenship_and_nationality dbr:Haaland_v._Brackeen dbr:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld dbr:Haywood_v._Drown dbr:Hazleton,_Pennsylvania dbr:Head_Money_Cases dbr:International_child_abduction_in_the_United_States dbr:James_W._McCulloh dbr:James_v._Dravo_Contracting_Co. dbr:Texas_Heartbeat_Act dbr:State_legislation_in_protest_of_federal_law_in_the_United_States dbr:Arizona_Public_Service_Co._v._Snead dbr:Arizona_v._New_Mexico dbr:Arizona_v._United_States dbr:Albany_Antifederal_Committee dbr:John_Marshall dbr:Lacy_Clay dbr:Tafflin_v._Levitt dbr:Texas_government_response_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic dbr:Texas_secession_movements dbr:Director_of_Revenue_of_Missouri_v._CoBank_ACB dbr:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization dbr:Marbury_v._Madison dbr:Martin_v._Hunter's_Lessee dbr:Philip_P._Barbour dbr:Southland_Corp._v._Keating dbr:Gregory_v._Ashcroft dbr:Kris_Kobach dbr:Mike_Parson dbr:National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact dbr:Cannabis_in_Nebraska dbr:Cannabis_in_the_United_States dbr:Ratification dbr:Sears,_Roebuck_&_Co._v._Stiffel_Co. dbr:Section_109_of_the_Constitution_of_Australia dbr:Sanctuary_city dbr:Tyranny_of_the_majority dbr:World_Conference_against_Racism_2001 dbr:New_Jersey_Plan dbr:Ethanol_fuel_in_the_United_States dbr:Gun_laws_in_New_Jersey dbr:Oberlin–Wellington_Rescue dbr:Unlawful_combatant dbr:Narragansett_land_claim dbr:Political_positions_of_Nikki_Haley dbr:Treaty_of_Point_Elliott dbr:United_States_and_the_International_Criminal_Court dbr:Treaty_Clause dbr:Parental_Rights_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Utah_Transfer_of_Public_Lands_Act dbr:List_of_clauses_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Tarrant_Regional_Water_Dist._v._Herrmann dbr:Virginia_Uranium,_Inc._v._Warren dbr:Stop_Line_3_protests dbr:Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump dbr:Supremacy_clause dbr:Supremacy_Clause_(United_States_Constitution) dbr:Supremacy_Clause_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Supremacy_of_National_Law dbr:Supreme_Law_of_the_Land dbr:Supreme_law_of_the_land dbr:Legal_supremacy
is dbp:lawsapplied of dbr:Bonito_Boats,_Inc._v._Thunder_Craft_Boats,_Inc. dbr:Perez_v._Campbell dbr:Commonwealth_Edison_Co._v._Montana dbr:Cooper_v._Aaron dbr:Crosby_v._National_Foreign_Trade_Council dbr:Gade_v._National_Solid_Wastes_Management_Ass'n dbr:Mutual_Pharmaceutical_Co._v._Bartlett dbr:Trump_v._Vance dbr:Felder_v._Casey dbr:Arizona_v._United_States dbr:Director_of_Revenue_of_Missouri_v._CoBank_ACB
is dbp:subordinateTo of dbr:Constitution_of_California dbr:Constitution_of_Florida dbr:Constitution_of_Wisconsin dbr:Constitution_of_New_York
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Supremacy_Clause