Connecticut v. Doehr (original) (raw)
- Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/501/1.html
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6737687845557823257
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/501/1/case.html
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112615/connecticut-v-doehr/
- 14521398 (xsd:integer)
- 8016 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 993661897 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Byron_R._White
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_501
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Connecticut
- dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Due_Process_Clause
- dbr:Due_process
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Connecticut
- dbr:Mathews_v._Eldridge
- dbc:1991_in_Connecticut
- dbc:Legal_history_of_Connecticut
- dbr:Connecticut_Superior_Court
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Battery_(tort)
- dbr:Plurality_opinion
- dbr:William_H._Rehnquist
- dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Real_property
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:Harry_Blackmun
- dbr:Attachment_(law)
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Title_(property)
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Ex_parte
- dbr:Surety_bond
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- 0001-01-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1991 (xsd:integer)
- Connecticut v. Doehr, (en)
- Rehnquist (en)
- Scalia (en)
- 0001-06-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1991 (xsd:integer)
- Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
- A state law authorizing the prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property at the outset of a lawsuit, without notice to the defendant or a hearing and without any showing of extraordinary circumstances, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
- Blackmun (en)
- unanimous ; Rehnquist, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter (en)
- Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor (en)
- Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
- White (en)
- 172800.0
- White (en)
- Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (en)
- 1 (xsd:integer)
- 501 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Cite_journal
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Wikisource-inline
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:Ct_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1991_in_Connecticut
- dbc:Legal_history_of_Connecticut
- dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
- Connecticut v. Doehr (en)
- freebase:Connecticut v. Doehr
- yago-res:Connecticut v. Doehr
- wikidata:Connecticut v. Doehr
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iRLP
- (en)
- Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:501_U.S._1
- dbr:Attachment_(law)
- dbr:Connecticut_v_Doehr
- dbr:Provisional_remedy
is foaf:primaryTopic of