Durham rule (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1869) and Durham v. United States (1954). In Pike, the court wrote, "An accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect."

Property Value
dbo:abstract A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1869) and Durham v. United States (1954). In Pike, the court wrote, "An accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect." The Durham rule was abandoned in the case United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (1972). After the 1970s, U.S. jurisdictions have tended to not recognize this argument as it places emphasis on "mental disease or defect" and thus on testimony by psychiatrists and is argued to be somewhat ambiguous. The problem with the "product test" was that it gave psychiatric and psychological experts too much influence in a decision of insanity and not enough to jurors. Although an expert witness may testify as to his opinion in a trial, judges are reluctant to allow it when the opinion goes to the ultimate issue of a case, i.e. when the opinion alone could decide the outcome of a case. The product test asked expert witnesses to use their judgment in determining whether criminal actions were "'the product' of a mental disease or defect." It is the jury's job to decide whether a defendant's actions were the product of his mental disease or defect. The expert witness' job is to determine whether the defendant possesses a mental disease or defect. Further, often conflicting 'expert witnesses' were put on the witness stand by the prosecution and defense to draw the opposite conclusions regarding the cause of an individual's actions. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID 1642983 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 2481 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1096199564 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Psychiatrists dbr:Durham_v._United_States_(1954) dbr:Insanity_defense dbr:Not_guilty_by_reason_of_insanity dbr:Common_law dbc:Mental_health_law_in_the_United_States dbr:Jury dbr:Expert_witness dbr:State_v._Pike dbr:United_States_v._Brawner dbr:Criminal_act dbr:Criminal_case
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Redirect dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description
dcterms:subject dbc:Mental_health_law_in_the_United_States
rdfs:comment A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1869) and Durham v. United States (1954). In Pike, the court wrote, "An accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect." (en)
rdfs:label Durham rule (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:Durham rule wikidata:Durham rule https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iV1j
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Durham_rule?oldid=1096199564&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Durham_rule
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of dbr:Durham
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:Product_test
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Durham_v._United_States_(1954) dbr:Index_of_criminology_articles dbr:Insanity_defense dbr:Timeline_of_disability_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Mens_rea dbr:Morton_Birnbaum dbr:Criminal_law_of_the_United_States dbr:Forensic_psychiatry dbr:Durham dbr:State_v._Pike dbr:Neurolaw dbr:United_States_v._Brawner dbr:Product_test
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Durham_rule