False statements of fact (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are assertions, which are ostensibly facts, that are false. Such statements are not always protected by the First Amendment. This is usually due to laws against defamation, that is making statements that harm the reputation of another. In those cases, freedom of speech comes into conflict with the right to privacy. Because it is almost impossible for someone to be absolutely sure that what they say (in public) is true, a party who makes a false claim isn't always liable. Whether such speech is protected depends on the situation. The standards of such protection have evolved over time from a body of Supreme Court rulings.

Property Value
dbo:abstract In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are assertions, which are ostensibly facts, that are false. Such statements are not always protected by the First Amendment. This is usually due to laws against defamation, that is making statements that harm the reputation of another. In those cases, freedom of speech comes into conflict with the right to privacy. Because it is almost impossible for someone to be absolutely sure that what they say (in public) is true, a party who makes a false claim isn't always liable. Whether such speech is protected depends on the situation. The standards of such protection have evolved over time from a body of Supreme Court rulings. One of the landmark cases that established such standards was New York Times v. Sullivan (1964). In that case, the court ruled that statements about public officials must be given more protection in order to avoid squelching public debate. Similar protections were later expanded to statements about public figures (not just officials), and matters of "public concern" (including those involving private parties). Other examples of false statements of fact that do not receive First Amendment protection include false advertising, as in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc. (2014) and POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. (2014), and commercial speech to commit fraud as in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1980). (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink http://csulb.edu/~jvancamp/freedom1.html http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/95-815.pdf https://archive.org/details/firstamendmentre00euge https://web.archive.org/web/20111210022833/http:/www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oif/firstamendment/courtcases/courtcases.cfm http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/%23annotations
dbo:wikiPageID 34261612 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 13819 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1089878854 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Prior_restraint dbr:Rosenblatt_v._Baer dbr:Defamation dbr:John_Stuart_Mill dbr:United_States_Marine_Corps dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:United_States_constitutional_law dbr:United_States_free_speech_exceptions dbr:United_States_v._Alvarez dbr:Incitement dbr:Mens_rea dbr:Freedom_of_speech dbr:Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc. dbr:Libel dbr:Snyder_v._Phelps dbr:Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2005 dbr:Actual_malice dbr:Eugene_Volokh dbr:Censorship dbr:False_statement dbr:Reputation dbc:Freedom_of_expression dbc:Freedom_of_speech dbr:Jerry_Falwell dbr:John_Birch_Society dbc:United_States_First_Amendment_case_law dbr:First_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Obscenity dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:Sedition dbr:Slander dbr:New_York_Times_v._Sullivan dbr:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr. dbr:Stolen_Valor_Act dbr:Right_to_privacy dbr:Free_speech_in_the_United_States dbr:Dun_&_Bradstreet_v._Greenmoss_Builders dbr:UCLA_Law dbr:Illinois_ex_rel._Madigan_v._Telemarketing_Assoc.,_Inc. dbr:Riley_v._National_Federation_of_the_Blind_of_North_Carolina
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_web dbt:Refbegin dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist
dct:subject dbc:Freedom_of_expression dbc:Freedom_of_speech dbc:United_States_First_Amendment_case_law
gold:hypernym dbr:Exception
rdfs:comment In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are assertions, which are ostensibly facts, that are false. Such statements are not always protected by the First Amendment. This is usually due to laws against defamation, that is making statements that harm the reputation of another. In those cases, freedom of speech comes into conflict with the right to privacy. Because it is almost impossible for someone to be absolutely sure that what they say (in public) is true, a party who makes a false claim isn't always liable. Whether such speech is protected depends on the situation. The standards of such protection have evolved over time from a body of Supreme Court rulings. (en)
rdfs:label False statements of fact (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:False statements of fact wikidata:False statements of fact https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4jJ2K
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:False_statements_of_fact?oldid=1089878854&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:False_statements_of_fact
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:Defamation_and_the_First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Brandon_Brown_(racing_driver) dbr:United_States_defamation_law dbr:United_States_free_speech_exceptions dbr:Let's_Go_Brandon dbr:Gary_Gensler dbr:NASCAR dbr:Cryptocurrency_bubble dbr:False_statement dbr:Misrepresentation dbr:Economic_policy_of_the_Joe_Biden_administration dbr:Reasons_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_by_Justice_Cromwell dbr:Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States dbr:Defamation_and_the_First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
is rdfs:seeAlso of dbr:Gary_Gensler
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:False_statements_of_fact