Functionality doctrine (original) (raw)
In United States trademark law, the functionality doctrine prevents manufacturers from protecting specific features of a product by means of trademark law. There are two branches of the functionality doctrine: utilitarian functionality and aesthetic functionality. The rationale behind functionality doctrine is that product markets would not be truly competitive if newcomers could not make a product with a feature that consumers demand. Utilitarian functionality provides grounds to deny federal trademark protection to product features which do something useful. Patent law, not trademark, protects useful processes, machines, and material inventions. Patented designs are presumed to be functional until proven otherwise. Aesthetic functionality provides grounds to deny trademark protection to
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract | In United States trademark law, the functionality doctrine prevents manufacturers from protecting specific features of a product by means of trademark law. There are two branches of the functionality doctrine: utilitarian functionality and aesthetic functionality. The rationale behind functionality doctrine is that product markets would not be truly competitive if newcomers could not make a product with a feature that consumers demand. Utilitarian functionality provides grounds to deny federal trademark protection to product features which do something useful. Patent law, not trademark, protects useful processes, machines, and material inventions. Patented designs are presumed to be functional until proven otherwise. Aesthetic functionality provides grounds to deny trademark protection to design features which are included to make the product more aesthetically appealing and commercially desirable. Aesthetic features are within the purview of copyright law, which provides protection to creative and original works of authorship. (en) |
dbo:wikiPageID | 6760277 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength | 4547 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1118094706 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:Trade_dress dbr:Invention dbr:Copyright dbr:Trademark dbr:TrafFix_Devices,_Inc._v._Marketing_Displays,_Inc. dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:United_States_trademark_law dbr:Manufacturer dbr:Idea-expression_divide dbr:Machine dbr:United_States_trademark_law |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Trademark_law dbt:Intellectual_property dbt:Cleanup_bare_URLs dbt:Short_description |
dct:subject | dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbc:United_States_trademark_law |
rdf:type | yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Belief105941423 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Content105809192 yago:Doctrine105943300 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 |
rdfs:comment | In United States trademark law, the functionality doctrine prevents manufacturers from protecting specific features of a product by means of trademark law. There are two branches of the functionality doctrine: utilitarian functionality and aesthetic functionality. The rationale behind functionality doctrine is that product markets would not be truly competitive if newcomers could not make a product with a feature that consumers demand. Utilitarian functionality provides grounds to deny federal trademark protection to product features which do something useful. Patent law, not trademark, protects useful processes, machines, and material inventions. Patented designs are presumed to be functional until proven otherwise. Aesthetic functionality provides grounds to deny trademark protection to (en) |
rdfs:label | Functionality doctrine (en) |
owl:sameAs | freebase:Functionality doctrine yago-res:Functionality doctrine wikidata:Functionality doctrine https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4jyYH |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Functionality_doctrine?oldid=1118094706&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Functionality_doctrine |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Functionality_Doctrine dbr:Doctrine_of_functionality |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co. dbr:Rosetta_Stone_Ltd._v._Google,_Inc. dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Hughes_Court dbr:Functionality_Doctrine dbr:TrafFix_Devices,_Inc._v._Marketing_Displays,_Inc. dbr:Purely_functional dbr:Kellogg_Co._v._National_Biscuit_Co. dbr:Doctrine_of_functionality dbr:Idea–expression_distinction |
is rdfs:seeAlso of | dbr:Trademark |
is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Functionality_doctrine |