Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (original) (raw)
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision. It stated that lawyers engage in "trade or commerce" and hence ended the legal profession's exemption from antitrust laws. (en)
- http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do%3Furi=CELEX:61999J0309:EN:HTML
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep421/usrep421773/usrep421773.pdf
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/421/773.html
- https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/497/1/220498/
- https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/355/491/1447810/
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13155838236565589433
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/421/773/case.html
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109269/goldfarb-v-virginia-state-bar/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/1974/74-70
- 22494995 (xsd:integer)
- 9600 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1080533679 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:F.2d
- dbc:1975_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Virginia
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_professional_responsibility_case_law
- dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law
- dbr:Title_search
- dbr:U.S._Supreme_Court
- dbc:Legal_history_of_Virginia
- dbr:American_Bar_Association
- dbr:Fairfax_County,_Virginia
- dbr:Parker_v._Brown
- dbr:Addyston_Pipe_and_Steel_Company_v._United_States
- dbc:American_Bar_Association
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Virginia
- dbr:Wouters_v_Algemene_Raad_van_de_Nederlandse_Orde_van_Advocaten
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
- dbr:Virginia_State_Bar
- dbr:Interstate_commerce
- dbr:Virginia_Supreme_Court
- dbr:F._Supp.
- dbr:US_antitrust_law
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- dbr:United_States_v._Socony-Vacuum_Oil_Co,_Inc.
- dbr:United_States_v._Trenton_Potteries
- 0001-03-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1975 (xsd:integer)
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, (en)
- 0001-06-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1975 (xsd:integer)
- Goldfarb et ux. v. Virginia State Bar et al (en)
- The legal profession is subject to the Sherman Antitrust Act. A minimum-fee schedule for basic legal services is in restraint of trade and is illegal. (en)
- Douglas, Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Rehnquist (en)
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (en)
- Burger (en)
- Powell (en)
- 172800.0
- 17280.0
- 773 (xsd:integer)
- 421 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:1975_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_professional_responsibility_case_law
- dbc:United_States_antitrust_case_law
- dbc:Legal_history_of_Virginia
- dbc:American_Bar_Association
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- umbel-rc:Event
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision. It stated that lawyers engage in "trade or commerce" and hence ended the legal profession's exemption from antitrust laws. (en)
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (en)
- freebase:Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
- yago-res:Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
- wikidata:Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4kq4G
- (en)
- Goldfarb et ux. v. Virginia State Bar et al (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona
- dbr:United_States_antitrust_law
- dbr:Gade_v._National_Solid_Wastes_Management_Ass'n
- dbr:Parker_immunity_doctrine
- dbr:421_U.S._773
- dbr:North_Carolina_State_Board_of_Dental_Examiners_v._FTC
- dbr:Legal_advertising_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Goldfarb_v_Virginia_State_Bar
- dbr:Virginia_State_Bar
- dbr:William_Durland
is foaf:primaryTopic of