Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. (original) (raw)
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case that tested the extent of software copyright. The lower court had held that copyright does not extend to the user interface of a computer program, such as the text and layout of menus. Due to the recusal of one justice, the Supreme Court decided the case with an eight-member bench that split evenly, leaving the lower court's decision affirmed but setting no national precedent. (en)
- https://archive.today/20070714104754/http:/www.gesmer.com/publications/article.php%3FID=103
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=18208011207990458376
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/117991/lotus-development-corp-v-borland-international-inc/
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94-2003.ZPC.html
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/94-2003
- http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep516/usrep516233/usrep516233.pdf
- https://openjurist.org/516/us/233
- 5676819 (xsd:integer)
- 11864 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1057308600 (xsd:integer)
- dbc:Tie_votes_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court
- dbr:Quattro_Pro
- dbr:Menu_(computing)
- dbr:Borland
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_516
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_First_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Massachusetts
- dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court
- dbr:User_interface
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbr:Concurring_opinion
- dbr:Copyright
- dbr:Copyright_infringement
- dbr:Lotus_1-2-3
- dbr:Lotus_Software
- dbr:Chilling_effect
- dbr:Closed_platform
- dbr:Computer_program
- dbr:Icon_(computing)
- dbr:Patent
- dbr:Spreadsheet
- dbr:1st_Cir.
- dbc:1996_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law
- dbr:Novell
- dbr:Machine_code
- dbr:Source_code
- dbc:Spreadsheet_software
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbc:IBM
- dbc:United_States_computer_case_law
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbc:Borland
- dbr:Philippe_Kahn
- dbr:Application_programming_interfaces
- dbr:Michael_Boudin
- dbr:Microsoft
- dbr:Microsoft_Excel
- dbr:Oracle_America,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc.
- dbr:Writ_of_certiorari
- dbr:Macro_(computer_science)
- dbr:United_States_district_court
- dbr:Title_17_of_the_United_States_Code
- dbr:Software_copyright
- dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume
- dbr:Video_cassette_recorder
- dbr:Per_curiam
- dbr:Recusal
- dbr:Software_clone
- dbr:Interface_(computer_science)
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:F._Supp.
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- 0001-01-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1996 (xsd:integer)
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., (en)
- 0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 1996 (xsd:integer)
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc. (en)
- The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court. (en)
- 17 (xsd:integer)
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. (en)
- Stevens (en)
- 172800.0
- yes (en)
- 25920.0
- 233 (xsd:integer)
- 516 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Citation_needed
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:Rp
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:USArticleI
- dbc:Tie_votes_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:1996_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law
- dbc:Spreadsheet_software
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbc:IBM
- dbc:United_States_computer_case_law
- dbc:Borland
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996), is a United States Supreme Court case that tested the extent of software copyright. The lower court had held that copyright does not extend to the user interface of a computer program, such as the text and layout of menus. Due to the recusal of one justice, the Supreme Court decided the case with an eight-member bench that split evenly, leaving the lower court's decision affirmed but setting no national precedent. (en)
- Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. (en)
- (en)
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corp._v._Borland_International,_Inc.
- dbr:Lotus_Dev._Corp._v._Borland_Int'l,_Inc
- dbr:Lotus_Dev._Corp._v_Borland_Int'l,_Inc.
- dbr:516_U.S._233
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corp._v._Borland_International,_Inc
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corporation_v._Borland_International,_Inc.
- dbr:Lotus_v._Borland
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law
- dbr:SAS_Institute_Inc_v_World_Programming_Ltd
- dbr:Borland
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court
- dbr:Robert_Keeton
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corp._v._Borland_International,_Inc.
- dbr:Lotus_Dev._Corp._v._Borland_Int'l,_Inc
- dbr:Lotus_Dev._Corp._v_Borland_Int'l,_Inc.
- dbr:Lotus_1-2-3
- dbr:516_U.S._233
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corp._v._Borland_International,_Inc
- dbr:Lotus_Development_Corporation_v._Borland_International,_Inc.
- dbr:Lotus_v._Borland
is foaf:primaryTopic of