Per curiam decision (original) (raw)
Un jugement per curiam est un jugement rendu par un tribunal ou une cour dont l'auteur n'est pas connu car non signé. En principe, tout jugement rendu par une juridiction de droit français (ou belge, etc.) serait techniquement un jugement « per curiam », même si cette expression est ignorée par la science du droit romano-civiliste. Au contraire, cette expression est utilisée généralement dans les traditions juridiques anglo-saxonnes où les juges des cours d'appel, fédérales ou de district, ont la possibilité de rendre des opinions dissidentes face au jugement majoritaire mais qui, pour une raison ou pour une autre, ne le veulent pas. Cette pratique de la dissidence existe également au Québec par influence anglo-saxonne sur des cours statuant aussi en droit romano-civiliste.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| dbo:abstract | Per curiam (lat. ‚durch das Gericht, im Namen des Gerichts‘) ist ein Rechtsbegriff, der ein Gerichtsurteil beschreibt, welches den gesamten Standpunkt eines Kollegialgerichts anonym und ohne Sondervotum formuliert. Bei einer Prozessordnung mit ist dies der Standpunkt der entscheidungstragenden Mehrheit. Die per-curiam-Entscheidung ist die vorgegebene Urteilsart im deutschen Rechtskreis, obwohl die deutschsprachige Rechtswissenschaft diesen Begriff nicht verwendet. Tatsächlich gehört per curiam zur Rechtssprache des Common Law. Antonyme: Sondervotum, Mindermeinung Bitte den Hinweis zu Rechtsthemen beachten! (de) Un jugement per curiam est un jugement rendu par un tribunal ou une cour dont l'auteur n'est pas connu car non signé. En principe, tout jugement rendu par une juridiction de droit français (ou belge, etc.) serait techniquement un jugement « per curiam », même si cette expression est ignorée par la science du droit romano-civiliste. Au contraire, cette expression est utilisée généralement dans les traditions juridiques anglo-saxonnes où les juges des cours d'appel, fédérales ou de district, ont la possibilité de rendre des opinions dissidentes face au jugement majoritaire mais qui, pour une raison ou pour une autre, ne le veulent pas. Cette pratique de la dissidence existe également au Québec par influence anglo-saxonne sur des cours statuant aussi en droit romano-civiliste. (fr) In law, a per curiam decision (or opinion) is a ruling issued by an appellate court of multiple judges in which the decision rendered is made by the court (or at least, a majority of the court) acting collectively (and typically, though not necessarily, unanimously). In contrast to regular opinions, a per curiam does not list the individual judge responsible for authoring the decision, but minority concurring and dissenting opinions are signed. It is not the only type of decision that can reflect the opinion of the court. Other types of decisions can also reflect the opinion of the entire court, such as unanimous decisions in which the opinion of the court is expressed, with an author listed. The term per curiam is Latin for "by the court". (en) Na lei, a decisão per curiam (ou parecer) é uma decisão emitida por um tribunal de apelação de vários juizes, em que a decisão proferida é feita pelo tribunal (ou pelo menos, a maioria do tribunal), agindo em conjunto e por unanimidade. Em contraste com as opiniões comuns, um per curiam não lista o juiz como o indivíduo responsável pela autoria da decisão, mas a minoria discordante e concordante da decisões é assinada. Per curiam não é o único tipo de decisão que pode refletir a opinião do tribunal. Outros tipos de decisões também podem refletir na opinião de toda a corte, como decisões unânimes, em que o parecer do tribunal se expressa com um autor listado. O termo em latim per curiam significa literalmente "pelo tribunal." (pt) |
| dbo:wikiPageID | 1708681 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength | 7785 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1100046163 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:American_Tradition_Partnership,_Inc._v._Bullock dbr:Bora_Laskin dbr:Brandenburg_v._Ohio dbc:Works_published_anonymously dbr:City_of_New_Orleans_v._Dukes dbr:Furman_v._Georgia dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Appellate_court dbr:Buckley_v._Valeo dbr:Bush_v._Gore dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Alexander_v._Holmes_County_Board_of_Education dbr:Dusky_v._United_States dbr:Ex_parte_Quirin dbr:Judge dbr:Court dbc:Latin_legal_terminology dbc:Judgment_(law) dbc:Judiciaries dbr:Chief_Justice_of_Canada dbr:Latin dbr:Law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Florida dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Toolson_v._New_York_Yankees,_Inc. dbr:New_York_Supreme_Court,_Appellate_Division dbr:One,_Inc._v._Olesen dbr:Ray_v._Blair dbr:New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States dbr:United_States_Courts_of_Appeals dbr:Los_Angeles_County_v._Rettele dbr:Second_Circuit dbr:Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Brooklyn_v._Cuomo dbr:Third_Circuit dbr:Wikt:per_curiam |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Distinguish dbt:Globalize dbt:Main_article dbt:Portal_bar dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Ussc dbt:Category_see_also dbt:Judicial_opinions |
| dcterms:subject | dbc:Works_published_anonymously dbc:Latin_legal_terminology dbc:Judgment_(law) dbc:Judiciaries |
| gold:hypernym | dbr:Ruling |
| rdf:type | owl:Thing dbo:Noble yago:WikicatCourtSystems yago:Artifact100021939 yago:Instrumentality103575240 yago:Object100002684 yago:PhysicalEntity100001930 yago:System104377057 yago:Whole100003553 |
| rdfs:comment | Un jugement per curiam est un jugement rendu par un tribunal ou une cour dont l'auteur n'est pas connu car non signé. En principe, tout jugement rendu par une juridiction de droit français (ou belge, etc.) serait techniquement un jugement « per curiam », même si cette expression est ignorée par la science du droit romano-civiliste. Au contraire, cette expression est utilisée généralement dans les traditions juridiques anglo-saxonnes où les juges des cours d'appel, fédérales ou de district, ont la possibilité de rendre des opinions dissidentes face au jugement majoritaire mais qui, pour une raison ou pour une autre, ne le veulent pas. Cette pratique de la dissidence existe également au Québec par influence anglo-saxonne sur des cours statuant aussi en droit romano-civiliste. (fr) Per curiam (lat. ‚durch das Gericht, im Namen des Gerichts‘) ist ein Rechtsbegriff, der ein Gerichtsurteil beschreibt, welches den gesamten Standpunkt eines Kollegialgerichts anonym und ohne Sondervotum formuliert. Bei einer Prozessordnung mit ist dies der Standpunkt der entscheidungstragenden Mehrheit. Die per-curiam-Entscheidung ist die vorgegebene Urteilsart im deutschen Rechtskreis, obwohl die deutschsprachige Rechtswissenschaft diesen Begriff nicht verwendet. Tatsächlich gehört per curiam zur Rechtssprache des Common Law. Antonyme: Sondervotum, Mindermeinung (de) In law, a per curiam decision (or opinion) is a ruling issued by an appellate court of multiple judges in which the decision rendered is made by the court (or at least, a majority of the court) acting collectively (and typically, though not necessarily, unanimously). In contrast to regular opinions, a per curiam does not list the individual judge responsible for authoring the decision, but minority concurring and dissenting opinions are signed. (en) Na lei, a decisão per curiam (ou parecer) é uma decisão emitida por um tribunal de apelação de vários juizes, em que a decisão proferida é feita pelo tribunal (ou pelo menos, a maioria do tribunal), agindo em conjunto e por unanimidade. Em contraste com as opiniões comuns, um per curiam não lista o juiz como o indivíduo responsável pela autoria da decisão, mas a minoria discordante e concordante da decisões é assinada. (pt) |
| rdfs:label | Per curiam (de) Per curiam (fr) Per curiam decision (en) Per curiam (pt) |
| owl:differentFrom | dbr:Per_incuriam |
| owl:sameAs | freebase:Per curiam decision yago-res:Per curiam decision wikidata:Per curiam decision dbpedia-de:Per curiam decision dbpedia-fr:Per curiam decision dbpedia-pt:Per curiam decision dbpedia-simple:Per curiam decision https://global.dbpedia.org/id/xkny |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Per_curiam_decision?oldid=1100046163&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Per_curiam_decision |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of | dbr:Decision |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Per_Curium dbr:Per_curium dbr:Per_Curiam dbr:Per_curiam dbr:Per_curiam_decisions dbr:Per_curiam_opinion |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Caetano_v._Massachusetts dbr:Robert_Tralins dbr:Rose_v._Locke dbr:Schenck_v._United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_copyright_case_law dbr:List_of_criminal_cases_in_the_Marshall_Court dbr:Procedures_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Benisek_v._Lamone dbr:Board_of_Trustees_of_Scarsdale_v._McCreary dbr:Brett_Kavanaugh dbr:Desilets_v._Clearview_Regional_Board_of_Education dbr:Hollingsworth_v._Perry dbr:Rehnquist_Court dbr:Reyes_Mata_v._Lynch dbr:Ricci_v._DeStefano dbr:Robert_Alton_Harris dbr:Robert_Jubelirer dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Armed_Forces dbr:United_States_v._Krasnov dbr:United_States_v._Texas_(2016) dbr:V.L._v._E.L. dbr:Insular_Cases dbr:List_of_judgments_of_the_Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa_delivered_in_2016 dbr:List_of_judgments_of_the_Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa_delivered_in_2017 dbr:List_of_judgments_of_the_Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa_delivered_in_2018 dbr:Per_Curium dbr:Per_curium dbr:Washington_v._Trump dbr:1993_Iowa_murders dbr:Cooper_v._Aaron dbr:Noli_Eala dbr:R_v_R dbr:Church_of_the_Lukumi_Babalu_Aye_v._City_of_Hialeah dbr:City_of_New_Orleans_v._Dukes dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Emmet_G._Sullivan dbr:Germany_v._Philipp dbr:Gill_v._Whitford dbr:Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Espírita_Beneficente_União_do_Vegetal dbr:Montgomery_v._Louisiana dbr:Mullenix_v._Luna dbr:Anthony_Ray_Hinton dbr:Legal_challenges_to_the_Trump_travel_ban dbr:Blumenthal_v._Trump dbr:Ziglar_v._Abbasi dbr:Zubik_v._Burwell dbr:Decision dbr:Mazurek_v._Armstrong dbr:2000_United_States_presidential_election dbr:Buckley_v._Valeo dbr:Burks_v._United_States dbr:Bush_v._Gore dbr:Trump_v._Hawaii dbr:Trump_v._New_York dbr:Wesley_Ira_Purkey dbr:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt dbr:H._Lynn_Womack dbr:Log_Cabin_Republicans_v._United_States dbr:Amy_Coney_Barrett dbr:Alabama's_congressional_districts dbr:Daniel_Lewis_Lee dbr:Executive_Order_13769 dbr:Executive_Order_13780 dbr:Flood_v._Kuhn dbr:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunities_Act dbr:Judicial_opinion dbr:List_of_Latin_phrases_(P) dbr:United_States_v._DuBay dbr:Harold_Hitz_Burton dbr:Hildwin_v._Florida dbr:Texas_Heartbeat_Act dbr:Texas_v._Pennsylvania dbr:Chafin_v._Chafin dbr:Katherine_Harris dbr:Laurence_Silberman dbr:Supreme_Court_of_California dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:College_Network,_Inc._v._Moore_Educational_Publishers,_Inc. dbr:Dougherty_v._Stepp dbr:Azar_v._Garza dbr:Bump_stock dbr:By_the_Court_decisions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Fighting_words dbr:Int'l_Refugee_Assistance_Project_v._Trump dbr:Kingsland_v._Dorsey dbr:National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie dbr:New_York_State_Rifle_&_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._City_of_New_York dbr:R_v_Wang dbr:Rabe_v._Washington dbr:Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Mckesson_v._Doe dbr:New_York_state_government_response_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic dbr:Liverpool,_New_York_&_Philadelphia_Steamship_Co._v._Commissioners_of_Emigration dbr:Warbelton_v_Gorges dbr:Mozilla_Corp._v._FCC dbr:Section_91(2)_of_the_Constitution_Act,_1867 dbr:Un_chant_d'amour dbr:Sunshine_&_Health dbr:Per_Curiam dbr:Per_curiam dbr:Per_curiam_decisions dbr:Per_curiam_opinion |
| is dbp:decisionBy of | dbr:R_v_Wang |
| is owl:differentFrom of | dbr:Per_incuriam |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Per_curiam_decision |