Meadows v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (original) (raw)
In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| dbo:abstract | In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2010/S3.html |
| dbo:wikiPageID | 60300054 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength | 7883 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1082198185 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:Proportionality_(law) dbr:Judicial_review dbc:2010_in_case_law dbc:2010_in_Irish_law dbr:Female_genital_mutilation dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland_cases dbc:Irish_constitutional_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland dbr:Coat_of_arms_of_Ireland dbr:Immigration |
| dbp:appealedFrom | 0001-11-04 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:caption | dbr:Coat_of_arms_of_Ireland |
| dbp:citations | [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157 (en) |
| dbp:concurring | Fennelly J, Denham J, and Murray CJ (en) |
| dbp:court | dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland |
| dbp:dateDecided | 2010-01-21 (xsd:date) |
| dbp:decisionBy | Murray CJ (en) |
| dbp:dissenting | Hardiman J and Kearns P (en) |
| dbp:fullName | Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform (en) |
| dbp:italicTitle | yes (en) |
| dbp:judges | Murray CJ, Kearns P, Denham J, Hardiman J, Fennelly J. (en) |
| dbp:keywords | dbr:Proportionality_(law) dbr:Judicial_review dbr:Female_genital_mutilation dbr:Immigration (en) |
| dbp:name | Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform (en) |
| dbp:numberOfJudges | 5 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dct:subject | dbc:2010_in_case_law dbc:2010_in_Irish_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland_cases dbc:Irish_constitutional_law |
| rdfs:comment | In the case of Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality, and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157, the Supreme Court of Ireland found that the proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights. While the case concerned an application for judicial review of an asylum decision, the decision was described as carrying “implications for the whole body of Irish administrative law”. (en) |
| rdfs:label | Meadows v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform (en) |
| owl:sameAs | wikidata:Meadows v. Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform https://global.dbpedia.org/id/A6WRE |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Meadows_v._Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform?oldid=1082198185&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Meadows_v._Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:List_of_Irish_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:AAA_&_Anor_v_Minister_for_Justice_&_Ors |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Meadows_v._Minister_for_Justice,_Equality_and_Law_Reform |