Mobile v. Bolden (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that disproportionate effects alone, absent purposeful discrimination, are insufficient to establish a claim of racial discrimination affecting voting. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), which challenged new city boundaries that excluded virtually all black voters from Tuskegee, Alabama, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. It did not as readily distinguish between intent and results as it would in Mobile.

Property Value
dbo:abstract Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that disproportionate effects alone, absent purposeful discrimination, are insufficient to establish a claim of racial discrimination affecting voting. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), which challenged new city boundaries that excluded virtually all black voters from Tuskegee, Alabama, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. It did not as readily distinguish between intent and results as it would in Mobile. (en) Mobile v. Bolden (en français : Ville de Mobile, Alabama et autres contre Bolden et autres) est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendu le 22 avril 1980 (arrêt U.S. 55). (fr)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/446/case.html https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/110246/mobile-v-bolden/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/571/238/323193/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/423/384/2393812/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=5911281735575867501 https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/446/55 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1978/77-1844 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep446/usrep446055/usrep446055.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID 4793256 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 11312 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1120616964 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:F.2d dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Racial_discrimination dbr:Gomillion_v._Lightfoot dbr:Mobile,_Alabama dbr:Thomas_Virgil_Pittman dbc:1980_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbr:Tuskegee,_Alabama dbr:James_Nabrit_III dbr:5th_Cir. dbc:Legal_history_of_Alabama dbr:Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:At-large dbr:Jack_Greenberg dbc:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:History_of_Mobile,_Alabama dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Discrimination dbc:United_States_Fifteenth_Amendment_case_law dbr:S.D._Ala. dbr:Structural_discrimination dbr:Frederick_G._Bromberg dbr:F._Supp.
dbp:arguedate 0001-03-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear 1979 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case Mobile v. Bolden, (en)
dbp:concurrence Stevens (en) Blackmun (en)
dbp:cornell https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/446/55
dbp:courtlistener https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/110246/mobile-v-bolden/
dbp:decidedate 0001-04-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear 1980 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent White (en) Brennan (en) Marshall (en)
dbp:fullname City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Wiley L. Bolden, et al. (en)
dbp:googlescholar https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=5911281735575867501
dbp:holding Facially neutral electoral districting is constitutional, even if the at-large elections dilute the voting strength of black citizens. (en)
dbp:joinplurality Burger, Powell, Rehnquist (en)
dbp:justia https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/446/case.html
dbp:lawsapplied U.S. Const. amends. XIV, XV; 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973 (en)
dbp:litigants Mobile v. Bolden (en)
dbp:loc http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep446/usrep446055/usrep446055.pdf
dbp:oyez https://www.oyez.org/cases/1978/77-1844
dbp:parallelcitations 172800.0
dbp:plurality Stewart (en)
dbp:prior 17280.0
dbp:rearguedate 0001-10-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:reargueyear 1979 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage 55 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol 446 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:USRedistrictinglaw dbt:Alabama dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Ussc dbt:US14thAmendment
dcterms:subject dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1980_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbc:Legal_history_of_Alabama dbc:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:History_of_Mobile,_Alabama dbc:United_States_Fifteenth_Amendment_case_law
rdf:type owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that disproportionate effects alone, absent purposeful discrimination, are insufficient to establish a claim of racial discrimination affecting voting. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), which challenged new city boundaries that excluded virtually all black voters from Tuskegee, Alabama, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. It did not as readily distinguish between intent and results as it would in Mobile. (en) Mobile v. Bolden (en français : Ville de Mobile, Alabama et autres contre Bolden et autres) est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendu le 22 avril 1980 (arrêt U.S. 55). (fr)
rdfs:label Mobile v. Bolden (fr) Mobile v. Bolden (en)
owl:sameAs yago-res:Mobile v. Bolden wikidata:Mobile v. Bolden dbpedia-fr:Mobile v. Bolden https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4rggi
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Mobile_v._Bolden?oldid=1120616964&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Mobile_v._Bolden
foaf:name (en) City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Wiley L. Bolden, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:City_of_Mobile_v._Bolden dbr:446_U.S._55 dbr:Mobile_v_Bolden
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Joseph_N._Langan dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Burger_Court dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbr:Mary_Zoghby dbr:Gomillion_v._Lightfoot dbr:Mobile,_Alabama dbr:Thomas_Virgil_Pittman dbr:John_L._LeFlore dbr:Baker_v._Carr dbr:Timeline_of_Mobile,_Alabama dbr:Washington_v._Davis dbr:City_of_Mobile_v._Bolden dbr:446_U.S._55 dbr:Amendments_to_the_Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbr:Evans_v._Cornman dbr:Arthur_R._Outlaw dbr:Lambert_C._Mims dbr:Black_suffrage_in_the_United_States dbr:Mobile_v_Bolden
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Mobile_v._Bolden