Baker v. Carr (original) (raw)

dbo:abstract

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases. The court summarized its Baker holding in a later decision as follows: "Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the authority of a State Legislature in designing the geographical districts from which representatives are chosen either for the State Legislature or for the Federal House of Representatives." (Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)). The court had previously held in Gomillion v. Lightfoot that districting claims over racial discrimination could be brought under the Fifteenth Amendment. The case arose from a lawsuit against the state of Tennessee, which had not conducted redistricting since 1901. The state of Tennessee argued that the composition of legislative districts constituted a nonjusticiable political question, as the U.S. Supreme Court had held in Colegrove v. Green (1946). In a majority opinion joined by five other justices, Associate Justice William J. Brennan Jr. held that redistricting did not qualify as a political question, though he remanded the case to the federal district court for further proceedings. Associate Justice Felix Frankfurter strongly dissented, arguing that the Court's decision cast aside history and judicial restraint and violated the separation of powers between legislatures and courts. The case did not have any immediate effect on electoral districts, but it set an important precedent regarding the power of federal courts to address redistricting. In 1964, the Supreme Court would hand down two cases, Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, which required the United States House of Representatives and state legislatures to establish electoral districts of equal population on the principle of one person, one vote. (en)

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

dbo:wikiPageID

246769 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageLength

21236 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

1120166221 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

dbp:arguedatea

0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:arguedateb

20 (xsd:integer)

dbp:argueyear

1961 (xsd:integer)

dbp:case

Baker v. Carr, (en)

dbp:concurrence

Douglas (en)
Stewart (en)
Clark (en)

dbp:decidedate

0001-03-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:decideyear

1962 (xsd:integer)

dbp:dissent

Harlan (en)
Frankfurter (en)

dbp:el

dbp:fullname

Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe. C. Carr et al. (en)

dbp:holding

The redistricting of state legislative districts is not a political question. Therefore, cases related to the aforementioned are justiciable by the federal courts. (en)

dbp:joindissent

Harlan (en)
Frankfurter (en)

dbp:joinmajority

Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Stewart (en)

dbp:justia

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/369/186/

dbp:lawsapplied

U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. art. III; ; Tenn. Const. art. II (en)

dbp:litigants

Baker v. Carr (en)

dbp:loc

http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep369/usrep369186/usrep369186.pdf

dbp:majority

Brennan (en)

dbp:notparticipating

Whittaker (en)

dbp:overturnedPreviousCase

Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (en)

dbp:oyez

https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960/6

dbp:page

1 (xsd:integer)
30 (xsd:integer)
55 (xsd:integer)
186 (xsd:integer)
368 (xsd:integer)
533 (xsd:integer)
556 (xsd:integer)
630 (xsd:integer)
725 (xsd:integer)
735 (xsd:integer)
___ (en)

dbp:parallelcitations

172800.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:prior

179 (xsd:integer)

dbp:rearguedate

0001-10-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:reargueyear

1961 (xsd:integer)

dbp:subsequent

On remand, 206 F. Supp. 341 (en)

dbp:uspage

186 (xsd:integer)

dbp:usvol

369 (xsd:integer)

dbp:volume

328 (xsd:integer)
369 (xsd:integer)
372 (xsd:integer)
376 (xsd:integer)
377 (xsd:integer)
412 (xsd:integer)
446 (xsd:integer)
462 (xsd:integer)
478 (xsd:integer)
509 (xsd:integer)
556 (xsd:integer)
578 (xsd:integer)

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

dbp:year

1946 (xsd:integer)
1962 (xsd:integer)
1963 (xsd:integer)
1964 (xsd:integer)
1973 (xsd:integer)
1980 (xsd:integer)
1983 (xsd:integer)
1986 (xsd:integer)
1993 (xsd:integer)
2009 (xsd:integer)
2016 (xsd:integer)

dct:subject

rdf:type

rdfs:comment

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases. The court summarized its Baker holding in a later decision as follows: "Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the authority of a State Legislature in designing the geographical districts from which representatives are chosen either for the State Legislature or for the Federal House of Representatives." (Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)). The court had previously held in Gomillion v. Lightfoot that districting claims over racial discrimination could be brought under the Fifteenth Amendment. (en)

rdfs:label

Baker v. Carr (en)

owl:sameAs

prov:wasDerivedFrom

wikipedia-en:Baker_v._Carr?oldid=1120166221&ns=0

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-en:Baker_v._Carr

foaf:name

(en)
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe. C. Carr et al. (en)

is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of

dbr:Baker_(disambiguation)

is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of

is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of

is foaf:primaryTopic of

wikipedia-en:Baker_v._Carr