Peruta v. San Diego County (original) (raw)

dbo:abstract

Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a concealed carry permit. After an initial ruling (2-1) in 2014 that held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protected the right to carry a concealed weapon, the court reheard the case en banc, ultimately reversing the lower court ruling, saying that "there is no Second Amendment right for members of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public." While the ruling technically applied to all states and territories under the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, it only applied to California and Hawaii in practice because the remaining states in the Ninth Circuit's area of responsibility have either Shall-Issue licensing policies or allow concealed carry without a permit. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which in June 2017 denied the writ of certiorari, leaving the Ninth Circuit's en banc opinion in place. On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court ruled in NYSPRA v. Bruen that the "good cause" requirement was unconstitutional. (en)

dbo:thumbnail

wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St..._Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

dbo:wikiPageID

41940007 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageLength

17773 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

1101229387 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

dbp:case

25920.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:citations

25920.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:concurrence

Graber (en)

dbp:court

dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit

dbp:courtseal

Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg (en)

dbp:decidedate

0001-06-09 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:decideyear

2016 (xsd:integer)

dbp:dissent

Smith (en)
Callahan (en)
Silverman (en)

dbp:fullname

Edward Peruta et al v. County of San Diego et al. (en)

dbp:googlescholar

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=10143057211425779504

dbp:joinconcurrence

Thomas, McKeown (en)

dbp:joindissent

Bea (en)
Silverman , Bea , Smith (en)

dbp:joinmajority

Thomas, Pregerson, Graber, McKeown, Paez, Owens (en)

dbp:judges

Chief Circuit Judge Sidney R. Thomas; Senior Circuit Judge Harry Pregerson; Circuit Judges Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, Richard Paez. Consuelo Callahan, Carlos Bea, N. Randy Smith, and John B. Owens (en)

dbp:keywords

dbp:leagle

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160609130

dbp:litigants

Peruta v. San Diego County (en)

dbp:majority

Fletcher (en)

dbp:prior

25920.0 (dbd:second)

dbp:subsequent

Cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 1995 . (en)

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

dct:subject

rdf:type

rdfs:comment

Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a concealed carry permit. (en)

rdfs:label

Peruta v. San Diego County (en)

owl:sameAs

prov:wasDerivedFrom

wikipedia-en:Peruta_v._San_Diego_County?oldid=1101229387&ns=0

foaf:depiction

wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-en:Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of

is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of

is foaf:primaryTopic of

wikipedia-en:Peruta_v._San_Diego_County