Sua sponte (original) (raw)
En leyes, sua sponte (del latín: "por su propia cuenta") o suo motu "en su favor" describe un acto de autoridad tomado sin indicaciones formales de otra parte. El término generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un juez tomadas sin una moción previa o solicitud de las partes. La forma nostra sponte ("por nuestra propia cuenta") a veces es utilizada por el tribunal mismo, cuando la acción es tomada por un tribunal con varios miembros, como un tribunal de apelación, en lugar de un solo juez (los terceros que describan tales acciones aún se referirían a ellos como tomados por el tribunal como un todo y, por lo tanto, como 'sua sponte'). Si bien generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un tribunal, el término puede aplicarse razonablemente a las acciones de agencias gubernamentales y persona
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract | En leyes, sua sponte (del latín: "por su propia cuenta") o suo motu "en su favor" describe un acto de autoridad tomado sin indicaciones formales de otra parte. El término generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un juez tomadas sin una moción previa o solicitud de las partes. La forma nostra sponte ("por nuestra propia cuenta") a veces es utilizada por el tribunal mismo, cuando la acción es tomada por un tribunal con varios miembros, como un tribunal de apelación, en lugar de un solo juez (los terceros que describan tales acciones aún se referirían a ellos como tomados por el tribunal como un todo y, por lo tanto, como 'sua sponte'). Si bien generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un tribunal, el término puede aplicarse razonablemente a las acciones de agencias gubernamentales y personas que actúen en calidad de funcionarios. Una situación en la que una parte puede alentar a un juez a moverse "por su cuenta" ocurre cuando esa parte está preservando una apariencia especial (generalmente para desafiar la jurisdicción), y por lo tanto no puede hacer movimientos en su propio nombre sin hacer una aparición general. Las razones comunes para una acción tomada "por su cuenta" son cuando el juez determina que el tribunal no tiene jurisdicción sobre la materia o que el caso debe ser movido a otro juez debido a un conflicto de intereses, incluso si todas las partes están en desacuerdo. (es) In law, sua sponte (Latin: "of his, her, its or their own accord") or suo motu ("on its own motion") describes an act of authority taken without formal prompting from another party. The term is usually applied to actions by a judge taken without a prior motion or request from the parties. The form nostra sponte ("of our own accord") is sometimes used by the court itself, when the action is taken by a multi-member court, such as an appellate court, rather than by a single judge. (Third parties describing such actions would still refer to them as being taken by the court as a whole and therefore as 'sua sponte'.) While usually applied to actions of a court, the term may reasonably be applied to actions by government agencies and individuals acting in official capacity. One situation in which a party might encourage a judge to move sua sponte occurs when that party is preserving a special appearance (usually to challenge jurisdiction), and therefore cannot make motions on its own behalf without making a general appearance. Common reasons for an action taken sua sponte are when the judge determines that the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction or that the case should be moved to another judge because of a conflict of interest, even if all parties disagree. (en) |
dbo:wikiPageID | 1681120 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength | 6926 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1100743613 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:Motion_(legal) dbr:Motu_proprio dbr:Appearance_(law) dbr:United_States_Army_Rangers dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:Inquisitorial_system dbr:Conflict_of_interest dbr:Government_of_Pakistan dbr:Subject-matter_jurisdiction dbr:Party_(law) dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:75th_Ranger_Regiment dbr:Acquittal dbr:Judge dbr:Judgment_(law) dbr:Judgment_notwithstanding_verdict dbr:Habeas_corpus dbc:Latin_legal_terminology dbr:Latin dbr:Law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Pakistan dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:United_States_district_court dbr:Evidence_Act dbr:Civil_Procedure_Code dbr:Public_interest_litigation dbr:General_appearance |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Italic_title dbt:Short_description |
dcterms:subject | dbc:Latin_legal_terminology |
rdfs:comment | En leyes, sua sponte (del latín: "por su propia cuenta") o suo motu "en su favor" describe un acto de autoridad tomado sin indicaciones formales de otra parte. El término generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un juez tomadas sin una moción previa o solicitud de las partes. La forma nostra sponte ("por nuestra propia cuenta") a veces es utilizada por el tribunal mismo, cuando la acción es tomada por un tribunal con varios miembros, como un tribunal de apelación, en lugar de un solo juez (los terceros que describan tales acciones aún se referirían a ellos como tomados por el tribunal como un todo y, por lo tanto, como 'sua sponte'). Si bien generalmente se aplica a las acciones de un tribunal, el término puede aplicarse razonablemente a las acciones de agencias gubernamentales y persona (es) In law, sua sponte (Latin: "of his, her, its or their own accord") or suo motu ("on its own motion") describes an act of authority taken without formal prompting from another party. The term is usually applied to actions by a judge taken without a prior motion or request from the parties. The form nostra sponte ("of our own accord") is sometimes used by the court itself, when the action is taken by a multi-member court, such as an appellate court, rather than by a single judge. (Third parties describing such actions would still refer to them as being taken by the court as a whole and therefore as 'sua sponte'.) While usually applied to actions of a court, the term may reasonably be applied to actions by government agencies and individuals acting in official capacity. (en) |
rdfs:label | Sua sponte (es) Sua sponte (en) |
owl:sameAs | freebase:Sua sponte wikidata:Sua sponte dbpedia-es:Sua sponte http://hi.dbpedia.org/resource/सुआ_स्पोंटे https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4vrwN |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Sua_sponte?oldid=1100743613&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Sua_sponte |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of | dbr:Sua_Sponte dbr:Suo_moto dbr:Suo_motto dbr:Suo_motu dbr:Nostra_sponte dbr:On_its_own_motion dbr:On_its_self_motion |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:American_Booksellers_Foundation_for_Free_Expression_v._Strickland dbr:Quanta_Computer,_Inc._v._LG_Electronics,_Inc. dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Texas dbr:Mohammad_Munaf dbr:Motu_proprio dbr:2009_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:2011_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Clarence_Thomas dbr:2011_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Ben_Gold dbr:Bowles_v._Russell dbr:Day_v._McDonough dbr:Devan_Ramachandran dbr:Arar_v._Ashcroft dbr:Jonathan_Pollard dbr:Judicial_disqualification dbr:Paul_Pozonsky dbr:Peter_v._NantKwest,_Inc. dbr:Reyes_Mata_v._Lynch dbr:United_States_v._Flynn dbr:United_States_v._Jorn dbr:United_States_v._More dbr:United_States_v._Students_Challenging_Regulatory_Agency_Procedures dbr:Double_jeopardy dbr:Index_of_law_articles dbr:Inquisitorial_system dbr:Iura_novit_curia dbr:Constitutional_Court_of_Albania dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Colfax_massacre dbr:Froilan_Tenorio dbr:Munaf_v._Geren dbr:Muntaqim_v._Coombe dbr:Murder_of_Joey_Fischer dbr:Continuance dbr:Thomas_Martin_Thompson dbr:Thompson_v._City_of_Louisville dbr:Baskin_v._Bogan dbr:Limtiaco_v._Camacho dbr:Louisville_&_Nashville_Railroad_Co._v._Mottley dbr:Lynn_Hughes dbr:Mamnoon_Rahman dbr:Mancusi_v._DeForte dbr:Simon_Tam dbr:Subject-matter_jurisdiction dbr:Colorado_ex_rel._Suthers_v._Hall dbr:Public_interest_litigation_in_India dbr:Md._Emdadul_Huq dbr:Md._Habibul_Gani dbr:2006_Vadodara_riots dbr:Bankruptcy_Abuse_Prevention_and_Consumer_Protection_Act dbr:Brown_v._Maryland dbr:Washington_v._Confederated_Bands_and_Tribes_of_the_Yakima_Indian_Nation dbr:2G_spectrum_case dbr:2007_in_Pakistan dbr:Custodial_death_of_P_Jayaraj_and_Bennicks dbr:Exxon_Mobil_Corp._v._Saudi_Basic_Industries_Corp. dbr:Capitol_Records,_Inc._v._Thomas-Rasset dbr:Cardona_v._Shinseki dbr:Judicial_activism dbr:List_of_Latin_legal_terms dbr:List_of_Latin_phrases_(S) dbr:Removal_jurisdiction dbr:Greenlaw_v._United_States dbr:Guey_Heung_Lee_v._Johnson dbr:Harry_Bowman dbr:JPMorgan_Chase_Bank_v._Traffic_Stream_(BVI)_Infrastructure_Ltd. dbr:Court_of_Cassation_(France) dbr:Jencks_Act dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Colorado dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Missouri dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_New_Mexico dbr:Athar_Minallah dbr:Kathua_rape_case dbr:Bihar_State_Information_Commission dbr:Supreme_Court_of_India dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Pakistan dbr:United_States_v._Vampire_Nation dbr:Plumhoff_v._Rickard dbr:Citizens_for_Equal_Protection_v._Bruning dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Import-Export_Clause dbr:Impression_Prods.,_Inc._v._Lexmark_Int'l,_Inc. dbr:In_re_Bilski dbr:Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley_&_Sons,_Inc. dbr:Navdeep_Asija dbr:O'Connor_v._Ortega dbr:Ocasio_v._United_States dbr:Reed_Elsevier,_Inc._v._Muchnick dbr:Sheikh_Md._Zakir_Hossain dbr:Rule_of_lenity dbr:Sridevi_(unreleased_film) dbr:Peruta_v._San_Diego_County dbr:Prohibition_of_Unlawful_Assembly_(Inte..._of_Matrimonial_Alliances)_Bill,_2011 dbr:United_States_constitutional_criminal_procedure dbr:Sua_Sponte dbr:Suo_moto dbr:Suo_motto dbr:Suo_motu dbr:Nostra_sponte dbr:On_its_own_motion dbr:On_its_self_motion |
is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Sua_sponte |