| dbo:abstract |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 573 U.S. 134 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court opinion regarding foreign sovereign immunity. After defaulting on its debt and losing a federal collection action, Argentina claimed that its foreign assets were immune from discovery. The Court found that no such immunity existed. On the same day as it announced this opinion the Supreme Court denied Argentina's appeal of a court order prohibiting Argentina from giving preference to certain creditors. This was the third case involving Argentina that term, with BG Group Plc v. Republic of Argentina involving Argentina's refusal to obey a neutral arbitrator's order and Daimler AG v. Bauman involving atrocities committed by the Argentinian military junta during its Dirty War. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=15766992367873042474 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_842 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-842 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/134/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-842_5hdk.pdf |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
45513306 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
11773 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1032134175 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbr:Argentine_debt_restructuring dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_573 dbr:United_Nations_General_Assembly dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Mauricio_Macri dbr:1998–2002_Argentine_great_depression dbr:Edwin_Kneedler dbr:Theodore_Olson dbr:Banco_de_la_Nación_Argentina dbr:Bank_of_America dbr:2d_Cir. dbr:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman dbr:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunities_Act dbr:Pari_passu dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunity_Act_case_law dbr:Justice_Scalia dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Dirty_War dbr:Vulture_fund dbr:Tango_01 dbr:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunities_Act_of_1976 dbr:F.3d dbr:Justice_Ginsburg dbr:NML_Capital dbr:Thomas_Griesa |
| dbp:arguedate |
0001-04-21 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:argueyear |
2014 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:case |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., (en) |
| dbp:decidedate |
0001-06-16 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decideyear |
2014 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:dissent |
Ginsburg (en) |
| dbp:docket |
12 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:fullname |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (en) |
| dbp:holding |
No provision in the FSIA immunizes a foreign-sovereign judgment debtor from post judgment discovery of information concerning its extraterritorial assets. (en) |
| dbp:joinmajority |
Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan (en) |
| dbp:justia |
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/134/ |
| dbp:lawsapplied |
dbr:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunities_Act |
| dbp:litigants |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (en) |
| dbp:majority |
Scalia (en) |
| dbp:notparticipating |
Sotomayor (en) |
| dbp:oralargument |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_842 |
| dbp:otherSource |
Supreme Court (en) |
| dbp:otherUrl |
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-842_5hdk.pdf |
| dbp:oyez |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-842 |
| dbp:parallelcitations |
172800.0 |
| dbp:prior |
25920.0 |
| dbp:uspage |
134 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:usvol |
573 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ship dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleIII |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunity_Act_case_law |
| rdf:type |
owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 573 U.S. 134 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court opinion regarding foreign sovereign immunity. After defaulting on its debt and losing a federal collection action, Argentina claimed that its foreign assets were immune from discovery. The Court found that no such immunity existed. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. yago-res:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. wikidata:Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. https://global.dbpedia.org/id/tvUJ |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Republic_of_Argentina_v._NML_Capital,_Ltd.?oldid=1032134175&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Republic_of_Argentina_v._NML_Capital,_Ltd. |
| foaf:name |
(en) Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (en) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Republic_of_Argentina_v_NML_Capital,_Ltd. |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Argentine_debt_restructuring dbr:Thomas_P._Griesa dbr:Foreign_Sovereign_Immunities_Act dbr:Republic_of_Argentina_v_NML_Capital,_Ltd. |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Republic_of_Argentina_v._NML_Capital,_Ltd. |
