Daimler AG v. Bauman (original) (raw)

dbo:abstract

• Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

• http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/daimlerchrysler-ag-v-bauman/
• http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/enbanc/roundtable/daimlerchrysler-ag-v-bauman/
• https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1929137067016164680
• https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/11-965/
• https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2649076/daimler-ag-v-bauman/
• https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-965
• https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20090828100
• https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20110518142
• https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20111109136
• https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_11_965
• https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-965
• https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf

dbo:wikiPageID

• 43453753 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageLength

• 15420 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

• 1107630227 (xsd:integer)

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

• dbr:En_banc
• dbr:Torture_Victim_Protection_Act
• dbr:Pennoyer_v._Neff
• dbr:DaimlerChrysler
• dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
• dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
• dbr:Due_process
• dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
• dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
• dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
• dbr:Christian_Tomuschat
• dbr:Edwin_Kneedler
• dbr:González_Catán
• dbr:Goodyear_Dunlop_Tires_Operations,_S.A._v._Brown
• dbr:Linda_Greenhouse
• dbr:Stephen_Reinhardt
• dbr:Personal_jurisdiction
• dbr:BNSF_Railway_Co._v._Tyrrell
• dbr:Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v._Superior_Court
• dbc:Mercedes-Benz_Group
• dbr:Torture_Victim_Protection_Act_of_1991
• dbr:Jurisdiction
• dbr:Law_of_agency
• dbr:Alien_Tort_Statute
• dbr:Amnesty_International
• dbr:Aktiengesellschaft
• dbr:International_Shoe_Co._v._Washington
• dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law
• dbr:L._Ed._2d
• dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
• dbr:Diarmuid_O'Scannlain
• dbr:Dirty_War
• dbr:Dorothy_Wright_Nelson
• dbc:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law
• dbr:Mary_M._Schroeder
• dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor
• dbr:Mercedes-Benz
• dbr:Certiorari
• dbr:Solicitor_General
• dbr:In_personam
• dbr:Ronald_M._Whyte
• dbr:Stuttgart,_Germany
• dbr:F.3d
• dbr:U.S._LEXIS

dbp:arguedate

• 0001-10-15 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:argueyear

• 2013 (xsd:integer)

dbp:case

• Daimler AG v. Bauman, (en)

dbp:concurrence

• Sotomayor (en)

dbp:cornell

• https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/11-965

dbp:courtlistener

• https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2649076/daimler-ag-v-bauman/

dbp:decidedate

• 0001-01-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)

dbp:decideyear

• 2014 (xsd:integer)

dbp:docket

• 11 (xsd:integer)

dbp:fullname

• DaimlerChrysler AG, Petitioner v. Barbara Bauman, et al. (en)

dbp:googlescholar

• https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=1929137067016164680

dbp:holding

• Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. (en)

dbp:joinmajority

• Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Kagan (en)

dbp:justia

• https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/11-965/

dbp:lawsapplied

• dbr:Torture_Victim_Protection_Act_of_1991
• dbr:Alien_Tort_Statute

dbp:litigants

• Daimler AG v. Bauman (en)

dbp:majority

• Ginsburg (en)

dbp:opinionannouncement

• https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf

dbp:oralargument

• https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_11_965

dbp:otherSource

• Supreme Court (en)

dbp:otherUrl

• https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/11-965_1qm2.pdf

dbp:oyez

• https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/11-965

dbp:parallelcitations

• 172800.0

dbp:prior

• 25920.0

dbp:uspage

• 117 (xsd:integer)

dbp:usvol

• 571 (xsd:integer)

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

• dbt:Caselaw_source
• dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
• dbt:Reflist
• dbt:Use_mdy_dates
• dbt:Ussc

dcterms:subject

• dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
• dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
• dbc:Mercedes-Benz_Group
• dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law
• dbc:United_States_personal_jurisdiction_case_law

rdf:type

• owl:Thing
• dbo:Case
• dbo:LegalCase
• dbo:UnitOfWork
• wikidata:Q2334719
• dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

rdfs:comment

• Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. The court held that an American company cannot be sued for conduct occurring outside the United States and American courts do not have jurisdiction of such a claim. (en)

rdfs:label

• Daimler AG v. Bauman (en)

owl:sameAs

• freebase:Daimler AG v. Bauman
• yago-res:Daimler AG v. Bauman
• wikidata:Daimler AG v. Bauman
• https://global.dbpedia.org/id/kzrx

prov:wasDerivedFrom

• wikipedia-en:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman?oldid=1107630227&ns=0

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

• wikipedia-en:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman

foaf:name

• (en)
• DaimlerChrysler AG, Petitioner v. Barbara Bauman, et al. (en)

is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of

• dbr:Daimler_AG_v_Bauman

is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of

• dbr:Republic_of_Argentina_v._NML_Capital,_Ltd.
• dbr:Long-arm_jurisdiction
• dbr:Daimler_AG_v_Bauman
• dbr:Personal_jurisdiction
• dbr:BNSF_Railway_Co._v._Tyrrell
• dbr:Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v._Superior_Court

is foaf:primaryTopic of

• wikipedia-en:Daimler_AG_v._Bauman