| dbo:abstract |
The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: …when the ancestor by any gift or conveyance takes an estate of freehold, and in the same gift or conveyance an estate is limited either mediately or immediately to his heirs in fee simple or in fee tail; that always in such cases, 'the heirs' are words of limitation of the estate, not words of purchase. The rule was reported by Lord Coke in England in the 17th century as well-settled law. In England, it was abolished by the Law of Property Act 1925. During the twentieth century, it was abolished in most common law jurisdictions, including the majority of the states of the United States. However, in states where the abrogation has been interpreted to apply only to conveyances made after abrogation, the relevance of the rule today varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and in many states remains unclear. (en) 쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다. (ko) |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
33657291 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
9911 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1120584030 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Precedent dbr:En_banc dbr:Merger_doctrine_(property_law) dbr:Easter_term dbr:Estate_in_land dbr:England dbr:Lord_Chancellor dbr:Common_law dbr:Fee_simple dbr:Fee_tail dbc:Real_property_law dbc:Common_law_rules dbc:1581_in_England dbr:Doctrine_of_worthier_title dbr:Future_interest dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Estate_tax dbr:Edward_Coke dbr:English_common_law dbr:John_V._Orth dbr:Real_property dbr:Remainder_(law) dbr:Intestacy dbr:The_Common_Law_(Holmes) dbc:English_property_case_law dbc:1581_in_law dbr:King's_Bench dbr:Law_of_Property_Act_1925 dbr:Blackacre dbr:Occam's_razor dbr:Words_of_purchase dbr:Rule_against_perpetuities dbr:Sir_William_Shelley dbr:Vested_remainder dbr:States_of_the_United_States dbr:Trusts dbr:Future_interests dbr:Life_tenant dbr:Sion_Monastery dbr:Sir_Thomas_Bromley |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Property_law dbt:EB1911_poster dbt:Attribution_needed dbt:Authority_control dbt:Blockquote dbt:Efn dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates |
| dct:subject |
dbc:Real_property_law dbc:Common_law_rules dbc:1581_in_England dbc:English_property_case_law dbc:1581_in_law |
| gold:hypernym |
dbr:Rule |
| rdf:type |
owl:Thing yago:WikicatCommonLawRules yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Content105809192 yago:Idea105833840 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:Country yago:Rule105846054 |
| rdfs:comment |
쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다. (ko) The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: (en) |
| rdfs:label |
쉘리사건의 원칙 (ko) Rule in Shelley's Case (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Rule in Shelley's Case yago-res:Rule in Shelley's Case wikidata:Rule in Shelley's Case dbpedia-ko:Rule in Shelley's Case https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4v7iv |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case?oldid=1120584030&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of |
dbr:Shelley |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Rule_In_Shelley's_Case dbr:Rule_in_Shelley's_case dbr:Rule_in_Shelly's_Case dbr:The_Rule_in_Shelley's_Case dbr:Shelley's_rule |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:List_of_early_landmark_court_cases dbr:Charles_Fearne dbr:Index_of_law_articles dbr:Thomas_Bromley dbr:Doctrine_of_worthier_title dbr:Edward_Coke dbr:Remainder_(law) dbr:Edward_Vaughan_Williams dbr:William_Dean_(priest) dbr:Shelley dbr:Sir_William_Shelley dbr:Rule_In_Shelley's_Case dbr:Rule_in_Shelley's_case dbr:Rule_in_Shelly's_Case dbr:The_Rule_in_Shelley's_Case dbr:Shelley's_rule |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case |