Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the

thumbnail

Property Value
dbo:abstract Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the Seminole Tribe's lead by building their own bingo parlors on their reservations, leading many scholars to call the Seminole Tribe's victory in this case the "birth" of modern commercial gambling on reservations. (en)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St...s_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.svg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8685769048026249230&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1
dbo:wikiPageID 21901723 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 20048 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1088215691 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:California_v._Cabazon_Band_of_Mission_Indians dbr:Amicus_curiae dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases dbr:Bingo_(U.S.) dbr:Bob_Butterworth dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Paul_Hitch_Roney dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Indian_country dbr:Indian_reservation dbr:Injunction dbr:Public_Law_280 dbr:Native_American_gaming dbc:1981_in_Florida dbc:United_States_Native_American_gaming_case_law dbr:Federal_Indian_Policy dbr:Broward_County,_Florida dbr:Bryan_v._Itasca_County dbc:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbr:Jurisdiction dbc:Bingo dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Phyllis_A._Kravitch dbr:Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act dbr:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbr:Lewis_R._Morgan dbr:Barona_Group_v._Duffy
dbp:citations 17280.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:court dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit
dbp:courtseal Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.svg (en)
dbp:decidedate 0001-10-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear 1981 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent dbr:Paul_Hitch_Roney
dbp:fullname SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, an Organized Tribe of Indians, as recognized under and by the Laws of the United States, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BUTTERWORTH, the duly elected Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, Defendant-Appellant. (en)
dbp:holding The State of Florida does not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state, because the Bingo Statute is regulatory rather than prohibitory in nature. (en)
dbp:judges Lewis R. Morgan, Paul Hitch Roney, and Phyllis A. Kravitch (en)
dbp:litigants Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth (en)
dbp:majority Lewis R. Morgan, joined by Phyllis A. Kravitch (en)
dbp:prior Aff'g 491 F. Supp.1015 . (en)
dbp:subsequent Cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 . (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Infobox_COA_case
dct:subject dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law dbc:1981_in_Florida dbc:United_States_Native_American_gaming_case_law dbc:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbc:Bingo
rdfs:comment Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the (en)
rdfs:label Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth wikidata:Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth https://global.dbpedia.org/id/eSpZ
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth?oldid=1088215691&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St..._of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.svg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Hollywood,_Florida dbr:Native_American_gaming dbr:Gambling_in_Oregon dbr:The_Bingo_Palace
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth