Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (original) (raw)
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract | Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the Seminole Tribe's lead by building their own bingo parlors on their reservations, leading many scholars to call the Seminole Tribe's victory in this case the "birth" of modern commercial gambling on reservations. (en) |
dbo:thumbnail | wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St...s_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.svg?width=300 |
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink | https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=8685769048026249230&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1 |
dbo:wikiPageID | 21901723 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength | 20048 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID | 1088215691 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink | dbr:California_v._Cabazon_Band_of_Mission_Indians dbr:Amicus_curiae dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases dbr:Bingo_(U.S.) dbr:Bob_Butterworth dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Paul_Hitch_Roney dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Florida dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Indian_country dbr:Indian_reservation dbr:Injunction dbr:Public_Law_280 dbr:Native_American_gaming dbc:1981_in_Florida dbc:United_States_Native_American_gaming_case_law dbr:Federal_Indian_Policy dbr:Broward_County,_Florida dbr:Bryan_v._Itasca_County dbc:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbr:Jurisdiction dbc:Bingo dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Phyllis_A._Kravitch dbr:Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act dbr:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbr:Lewis_R._Morgan dbr:Barona_Group_v._Duffy |
dbp:citations | 17280.0 (dbd:second) |
dbp:court | dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit |
dbp:courtseal | Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.svg (en) |
dbp:decidedate | 0001-10-05 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
dbp:decideyear | 1981 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:dissent | dbr:Paul_Hitch_Roney |
dbp:fullname | SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, an Organized Tribe of Indians, as recognized under and by the Laws of the United States, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BUTTERWORTH, the duly elected Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, Defendant-Appellant. (en) |
dbp:holding | The State of Florida does not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state, because the Bingo Statute is regulatory rather than prohibitory in nature. (en) |
dbp:judges | Lewis R. Morgan, Paul Hitch Roney, and Phyllis A. Kravitch (en) |
dbp:litigants | Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth (en) |
dbp:majority | Lewis R. Morgan, joined by Phyllis A. Kravitch (en) |
dbp:prior | Aff'g 491 F. Supp.1015 . (en) |
dbp:subsequent | Cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 . (en) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | dbt:Infobox_COA_case |
dct:subject | dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit_cases dbc:1981_in_United_States_case_law dbc:1981_in_Florida dbc:United_States_Native_American_gaming_case_law dbc:Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida dbc:Bingo |
rdfs:comment | Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1981), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit case that significantly influenced the development of modern Indian Gaming law. In Seminole Tribe, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the State of Florida did not have authority to enforce the Florida Bingo Statute on the Seminole Tribe of Florida's reservation, even though Florida is a Public Law 280 state with special rights to extend criminal and limited civil jurisdiction over Indian Country. Because of the decision, the Seminole Tribe was able to build and operate the nation's first tribally-owned high-stakes bingo parlor on their reservation in Florida, even though bingo for profit was illegal under Florida law at the time. Many other tribes later followed the (en) |
rdfs:label | Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (en) |
owl:sameAs | freebase:Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth wikidata:Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth https://global.dbpedia.org/id/eSpZ |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth?oldid=1088215691&ns=0 |
foaf:depiction | wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_St..._of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit.svg |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | dbr:Hollywood,_Florida dbr:Native_American_gaming dbr:Gambling_in_Oregon dbr:The_Bingo_Palace |
is foaf:primaryTopic of | wikipedia-en:Seminole_Tribe_v._Butterworth |