| dbo:abstract |
Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It stated in clear terms that, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment rules regarding search and seizure applied to state governments. While this principle had been outlined in other cases, such as Mapp v. Ohio, this case added another level of constitutional consideration for the issuance of search warrants when articles of expression, protected by the First Amendment, are among the items to be taken. In effect, when a state issues a warrant that includes the order to seize books, it must accord the "most scrupulous exactitude" to the language of the Fourth Amendment. (en) |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=16331485070604740702 https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/476.html https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/379/476/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106964/stanford-v-texas/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/40 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep379/usrep379476/usrep379476.pdf |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
10709577 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
9187 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1017406643 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Potter_Stewart dbr:San_Antonio,_Texas dbr:Bexar_County,_Texas dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_379 dbr:James_Otis,_Jr. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Communist_Party_of_Texas dbr:SNCC dbr:Entick_v_Carrington dbr:Black_Panthers dbr:Angela_Davis dbr:Long_Parliament dbr:Star_Chamber dbr:Stuart_Restoration dbr:Petitioner dbr:Tudors dbr:American_Revolution dbr:Earl_Browder dbr:Fidel_Castro dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Jean-Paul_Sartre dbr:Court_of_King's_Bench_(England) dbr:Theodore_Draper dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Charles_Pratt,_1st_Earl_Camden dbc:1965_in_United_States_case_law dbr:John_Inman dbr:Karl_Marx dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Mapp_v._Ohio dbr:Pope_John_XXIII dbr:Certiorari dbr:Seditious_libel dbr:Writs_of_assistance dbr:General_warrant dbr:Unanimous dbr:U.S._LEXIS |
| dbp:arguedate |
0001-11-12 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:argueyear |
1964 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:case |
Stanford v. Texas, (en) |
| dbp:courtlistener |
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106964/stanford-v-texas/ |
| dbp:decidedate |
0001-01-18 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:decideyear |
1965 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:findlaw |
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/476.html |
| dbp:fullname |
Stanford v. Texas (en) |
| dbp:googlescholar |
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=16331485070604740702 |
| dbp:holding |
The protections of the Fourth Amendment are by the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed against invasion by the States, and the States may not constitutionally issue general warrants which do not describe with particularity the things to be seized, a requirement of the most scrupulous exactitude where the seizure also impinges upon First Amendment freedoms. (en) |
| dbp:joinmajority |
unanimous (en) |
| dbp:justia |
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/379/476/ |
| dbp:lawsapplied |
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution |
| dbp:litigants |
Stanford v. Texas (en) |
| dbp:loc |
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep379/usrep379476/usrep379476.pdf |
| dbp:majority |
Stewart (en) |
| dbp:oyez |
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/40 |
| dbp:parallelcitations |
172800.0 |
| dbp:prior |
Cert. granted, . (en) |
| dbp:uspage |
476 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:usvol |
379 (xsd:integer) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource dbt:Ussc |
| dcterms:subject |
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:1965_in_United_States_case_law |
| rdf:type |
owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
| rdfs:comment |
Stanford v. Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1965), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It stated in clear terms that, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment rules regarding search and seizure applied to state governments. While this principle had been outlined in other cases, such as Mapp v. Ohio, this case added another level of constitutional consideration for the issuance of search warrants when articles of expression, protected by the First Amendment, are among the items to be taken. In effect, when a state issues a warrant that includes the order to seize books, it must accord the "most scrupulous exactitude" to the language of the Fourth Amendment. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Stanford v. Texas (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Stanford v. Texas wikidata:Stanford v. Texas https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4vYVn yago-res:Stanford v. Texas |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Stanford_v._Texas?oldid=1017406643&ns=0 |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Stanford_v._Texas |
| foaf:name |
(en) Stanford v. Texas (en) |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:379_U.S._476 dbr:Stanford_v_Texas |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Warren_Court dbr:Maury_Maverick_Jr. dbr:Zurcher_v._Stanford_Daily dbr:379_U.S._476 dbr:Stanford_v_Texas dbr:Marcus_v._Search_Warrant |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Stanford_v._Texas |
