dbo:abstract |
Tamplin v James (1880) 15 Ch D 215 is an English contract law case concerning the availability of specific performance for a breach of contract induced by mistake. The case established that if a person enters a contract under a mistake that was not induced by the other party to the contract, specific performance may be awarded against the person if no hardship amounting to clear injustice would be inflicted on the person by holding him/her to the contract. The High Court of Australia has described its proposition as "a party to a contract cannot... escape specific performance by simply swearing that he did not understand it". (en) |
dbo:wikiPageID |
24912954 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageLength |
6343 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1082982596 (xsd:integer) |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:English_contract_law dbr:Richard_Baggallay dbr:Defendant dbr:Contract dbr:William_Milbourne_James_(judge) dbr:Mistake_in_English_contract_law dbc:1879_in_case_law dbr:Henry_Cotton_(judge) dbr:Specific_performance dbr:William_Brett,_1st_Viscount_Esher dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Breach_of_contract dbc:1879_in_British_law dbr:High_Court_of_Australia dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:English_contract_case_law dbr:Plaintiffs dbr:Obiter_dictum dbr:Cotton_LJ |
dbp:citations |
15 (xsd:integer) |
dbp:court |
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales |
dbp:dateDecided |
1879-07-13 (xsd:date) |
dbp:judges |
James LJ, Brett LJ and Cotton LJ (en) |
dbp:keywords |
Contract, sale of land, mistake, specific performance (en) |
dbp:name |
Tamplin v James (en) |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Caselist_agreement dbt:Infobox_court_case |
dcterms:subject |
dbc:1879_in_case_law dbc:1879_in_British_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:English_contract_case_law |
gold:hypernym |
dbr:Case |
rdf:type |
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase |
rdfs:comment |
Tamplin v James (1880) 15 Ch D 215 is an English contract law case concerning the availability of specific performance for a breach of contract induced by mistake. The case established that if a person enters a contract under a mistake that was not induced by the other party to the contract, specific performance may be awarded against the person if no hardship amounting to clear injustice would be inflicted on the person by holding him/her to the contract. (en) |
rdfs:label |
Tamplin v James (en) |
owl:sameAs |
freebase:Tamplin v James wikidata:Tamplin v James https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4vuYp |
prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Tamplin_v_James?oldid=1082982596&ns=0 |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Tamplin_v_James |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Richard_Baggallay dbr:William_Milbourne_James_(judge) dbr:Henry_Cotton_(judge) dbr:Specific_performance dbr:William_Brett,_1st_Viscount_Esher dbr:Hartog_v_Colin_&_Shields |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Tamplin_v_James |