United States v. Jones (2012) (original) (raw)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. In 2004 Antoine Jones was suspected by police in the District of Columbia of drug trafficking. Investigators asked for and received a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to the underside of Jones's car but then exceeded the warrant's scope in both geography and length of time. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that this was a search under the Fourth Amendment, although they were split 5-4 as to the fundamental reasons behind that conclusion. The majority held that by physically installing the GPS device on Jones's car, the police had committed a trespass against his "personal effects", This trespass, in an attempt to obtain information, constituted a search per se. (en)
- 合众国诉琼斯案(英語:United States v. Jones,《美国判例汇编》第565卷第400页(2012年)),是美国最高法院的一个里程碑式案件,该案认为,在车辆上安装全球定位系统(GPS)跟踪设备并使用该设备监测车辆的移动违反美国宪法第四修正案。 2004年,被告琼斯涉嫌贩毒。警方调查人员要求并收到一份搜查令,要求在被告的汽车底部安装GPS跟踪装置,但随后在地理位置和时间长度上都超出了搜查令的范围。最高法院的法官们一致投票认为这是第四修正案下的一次“搜查”,尽管他们对这一结论背后的根本原因持五比四的分歧。多数人认为,通过在被告的车上安装GPS设备,警方侵犯了琼斯的“个人物品”——这种企图获取信息的搜查行为本身就构成了侵犯行为。 (zh)
- http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42511.pdf
- https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/10-1259.html
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/400/
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1259
- https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=6122276400056758151
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/622304/united-states-v-jones/
- https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/US_v_Jones/maynard_decision.pdf
- https://www.justice.gov/osg/briefs/2010/2pet/7pet/2010-1259.pet.aa.pdf
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/2006522451fsupp2d711518
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/2007585511fsupp2d741580
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/inadvfco110223000067
- https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20100806162
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx%3FFileName=/docketfiles/10-1259.htm
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio_detail.aspx%3Fargument=10-1259
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/10-1259.pdf
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/10-01259qp.pdf
- 32337981 (xsd:integer)
- 35256 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
- 1122057961 (xsd:integer)
- dbr:Robert_Mueller
- dbr:Samuel_Alito
- dbr:En_banc
- dbr:F._Supp._2d
- dbr:North_Carolina_Law_Review
- dbr:John_Roberts
- dbr:Richard_Posner
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit
- dbr:United_States_v._Karo
- dbr:United_States_v._Knotts
- dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbr:Congressional_Research_Service
- dbr:Constitution_Project
- dbr:Electronic_Frontier_Foundation
- dbr:Ellen_Segal_Huvelle
- dbr:GPS
- dbr:Global_Positioning_System
- dbr:Concurring_opinion
- dbr:Antonin_Scalia
- dbr:Stored_Communications_Act
- dbr:Common_law
- dbr:File:Sonia_Sotomayor_in_SCOTUS_robe.jpg
- dbr:Cell_phone
- dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law
- dbr:Walter_E._Dellinger_III
- dbr:Washington,_D.C.
- dbr:Drug_trafficking
- dbr:D.C._Cir.
- dbr:Amicus_brief
- dbc:Global_Positioning_System
- dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law
- dbr:Exigent_circumstances
- dbr:Expectation_of_privacy
- dbr:Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation
- dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Nightclub
- dbr:Remand_(court_procedure)
- dbc:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law
- dbc:Surveillance
- dbc:Search_and_seizure_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
- dbr:Katz_v._United_States
- dbr:L._Ed._2d
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Mobile_phone_tracking
- dbr:Trespass
- dbr:District_of_Columbia
- dbr:Soldal_v._Cook_County
- dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor
- dbr:D.D.C.
- dbr:Metropolitan_Police_Department_of_the_District_of_Columbia
- dbr:Michael_Dreeben
- dbr:Certiorari
- dbr:Search_warrant
- dbr:Writ_of_certiorari
- dbr:Probable_cause
- dbr:Majority_opinion
- dbr:Search_and_seizure
- dbr:Warrant_(law)
- dbr:Expectation_of_privacy_(United_States)
- dbr:Common-law
- dbr:Plea_bargain
- dbr:Social_networking
- dbr:Mistrial_(law)
- dbr:Personal_effects
- dbr:Vehicle_tracking_systems
- dbr:F.3d
- dbr:U.S._LEXIS
- dbr:Wireless_service_provider
- dbr:Wiktionary:per_se
- dbr:File:Samuel_Alito_official_photo.jpg
- dbr:File:Antonin_Scalia,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg
- 0001-11-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2011 (xsd:integer)
- United States v. Jones, (en)
- Sotomayor (en)
- Alito (en)
- 0001-01-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
- 2012 (xsd:integer)
- 10 (xsd:integer)
- United States v. Antoine Jones (en)
- The attachment of the GPS device to a vehicle by the police, and its use to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment and requires a warrant. (en)
- Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
- Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor (en)
- United States v. Antoine Jones (en)
- Scalia (en)
- Supreme Court (en)
- 172800.0
- 25920.0
- 400 (xsd:integer)
- 565 (xsd:integer)
- dbt:'
- dbt:About
- dbt:Caselaw_source
- dbt:Cite_journal
- dbt:Good_article
- dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
- dbt:Portal
- dbt:Quote
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:Ussc
- dbt:US4thAmendment
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
- dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
- dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law
- dbc:Global_Positioning_System
- dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law
- dbc:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law
- dbc:Surveillance
- dbc:Search_and_seizure_case_law
- dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
- owl:Thing
- dbo:Case
- dbo:LegalCase
- dbo:UnitOfWork
- wikidata:Q2334719
- yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt
- yago:Abstraction100002137
- yago:Case107308889
- yago:Event100029378
- yago:Happening107283608
- yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
- yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
- dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
- 合众国诉琼斯案(英語:United States v. Jones,《美国判例汇编》第565卷第400页(2012年)),是美国最高法院的一个里程碑式案件,该案认为,在车辆上安装全球定位系统(GPS)跟踪设备并使用该设备监测车辆的移动违反美国宪法第四修正案。 2004年,被告琼斯涉嫌贩毒。警方调查人员要求并收到一份搜查令,要求在被告的汽车底部安装GPS跟踪装置,但随后在地理位置和时间长度上都超出了搜查令的范围。最高法院的法官们一致投票认为这是第四修正案下的一次“搜查”,尽管他们对这一结论背后的根本原因持五比四的分歧。多数人认为,通过在被告的车上安装GPS设备,警方侵犯了琼斯的“个人物品”——这种企图获取信息的搜查行为本身就构成了侵犯行为。 (zh)
- United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. (en)
- United States v. Jones (2012) (en)
- 合众国诉琼斯案 (zh)
- freebase:United States v. Jones (2012)
- yago-res:United States v. Jones (2012)
- wikidata:United States v. Jones (2012)
- dbpedia-zh:United States v. Jones (2012)
- https://global.dbpedia.org/id/WMXE
- wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Samuel_Alito_official_photo.jpg
- wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Sonia_Sotomayor_in_SCOTUS_robe.jpg
- wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Antonin_Scalia,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg
- (en)
- United States v. Antoine Jones (en)
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Carpenter_v._United_States
- dbr:Privacy
- dbr:Electronic_monitoring_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Mosaic_theory_(US_law)
- dbr:Brett_Kavanaugh
- dbr:Patriot_Act
- dbr:People_v._Diaz
- dbr:United_States_v._Knotts
- dbr:Inevitable_discovery
- dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Third-party_doctrine
- dbr:Geolocation_Privacy_and_Surveillance_Act
- dbr:Militarization_of_police
- dbr:United_States_v._Pineda-Moreno
- dbr:2012_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Walter_Dellinger
- dbr:Florida_v._Jardines
- dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Nineteen_Eighty-Four
- dbr:Mobile_phone_tracking
- dbr:Soldal_v._Cook_County
- dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor
- dbr:Rutherford_Institute
- dbr:In_re_Application_of_the_United_States_for_Historical_Cell_Site_Data
- dbr:United_States_v._Garcia
- dbr:United_States_v._Jones
- dbr:United_States_v._Graham
- dbr:Taylor_v._City_of_Saginaw
is foaf:primaryTopic of