Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster (original) (raw)

Property Value
dbo:abstract Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster was a case between Westminster City Council and the 6th Duke of Westminster (and fellow family trust co-trustees) heard in November 1990. The dispute concerned 532 flats in Page Street, Vincent Street and Regency Street, Pimlico, London. These had been designed by architect Sir Edwin Lutyens and erected between 1928-30 for the 2nd Duke and the other family trustees. In 1937 the trustees leased them (for a peppercorn rent of 1 shilling) to the council on a 999-year lease containing the stipulation that they be used only as "dwellings for the working classes... and no other purpose." In 1990 the Council argued that the term "working class" was now meaningless and that the stipulation should be overturned, allowing them to sell the leaseholds of the flats to anyone, against the Duke's wishes. The Duke maintained that the properties should remain available as low-rent accommodation for those who could not afford to purchase long leaseholds. His freehold interest means the Duke can charge for extensions and structural alterations. If a majority of a block becomes privately owned that majority can pay for and cease his future such rights: via collective enfranchisement. The case was dubbed Westminster v Westminster by the media. (en)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageID 40980153 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 16826 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1121542483 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:Queen's_Counsel dbc:Politics_of_the_City_of_Westminster dbr:Bassetlaw_(UK_Parliament_constituency) dbr:Dennis_Skinner dbr:Hugh_Grosvenor,_2nd_Duke_of_Westminster dbr:Peppercorn_(legal) dbr:Peter_Bradley_(politician) dbr:Victoria,_London dbr:1986_United_Kingdom_local_elections dbr:1990_United_Kingdom_local_elections dbr:Conservative_Party_(UK) dbr:Council_house dbr:Rumpole_of_the_Bailey dbc:1990_in_London dbr:City_of_Westminster dbr:Edwin_Lutyens dbr:Freehold_(law) dbr:Gerald_Grosvenor,_6th_Duke_of_Westminster dbc:1990s_in_the_City_of_Westminster dbc:History_of_the_City_of_Westminster dbr:London dbr:Shirley_Porter dbc:Westminster_City_Council dbc:Housing_in_London dbr:Westminster_City_Council dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Leasehold_estate dbr:Duke_of_Westminster dbr:Sunday_Correspondent dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbr:Covenant_(law) dbr:Positive_covenant dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbc:1990_in_British_law dbr:Charles_Irving_(politician) dbr:Cheltenham_(UK_Parliament_constituency) dbr:Jeremiah_Harman_(judge) dbr:Joe_Ashton dbr:John_Mortimer dbr:Labour_Party_(UK) dbr:Collective_enfranchisement dbr:Obsolescence dbr:Margaret_Thatcher dbr:Bolsover_(UK_Parliament_constituency) dbr:Pimlico dbr:Grosvenor_House dbr:Brown_ale dbr:Shilling dbr:Working_class dbr:Marginal_seat dbr:Porter_v_Magill dbr:Obiter_dictum dbr:Rule_against_perpetuities dbr:High_Court_of_Justice_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Sitting_tenant dbr:Council_housing dbr:Housing_law dbr:File:The_6th_Duke_of_Westminster_Allan_Warren.jpg dbr:File:"Checkerboard_Flats",_Page_Street,_SW1_-_geograph.org.uk_-_573512.jpg
dbp:appealedTo dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:citations [1991] 4 All ER 136 (en)
dbp:court dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbr:High_Court_of_Justice_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:dateDecided 1990-11-26 (xsd:date)
dbp:decisionBy dbr:Jeremiah_Harman_(judge)
dbp:fullName Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster and Others (en)
dbp:italicTitle force (en)
dbp:keywords dbr:Covenant_(law) dbr:Obsolescence dbr:Rule_against_perpetuities Whether consideration for headleases past (en) positive covenants (en)
dbp:name Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster (en)
dbp:priorActions Ruling of Lands Tribunal (en)
dbp:subsequentActions [1992] 24 572 CA reversal in part on another ground (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:EngvarB dbt:Main dbt:Reflist dbt:Sfn dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Abbreviation dbt:Infobox_Court_Case
dcterms:subject dbc:Politics_of_the_City_of_Westminster dbc:1990_in_London dbc:1990s_in_the_City_of_Westminster dbc:History_of_the_City_of_Westminster dbc:Westminster_City_Council dbc:Housing_in_London dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:High_Court_of_Justice_cases dbc:1990_in_British_law
gold:hypernym dbr:Case
rdf:type yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster was a case between Westminster City Council and the 6th Duke of Westminster (and fellow family trust co-trustees) heard in November 1990. The dispute concerned 532 flats in Page Street, Vincent Street and Regency Street, Pimlico, London. These had been designed by architect Sir Edwin Lutyens and erected between 1928-30 for the 2nd Duke and the other family trustees. In 1937 the trustees leased them (for a peppercorn rent of 1 shilling) to the council on a 999-year lease containing the stipulation that they be used only as "dwellings for the working classes... and no other purpose." (en)
rdfs:label Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster (en)
owl:sameAs freebase:Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster wikidata:Westminster City Council v Duke of Westminster https://global.dbpedia.org/id/WZhU
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Westminster_City_Council_v_Duke_of_Westminster?oldid=1121542483&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/The_6th_Duke_of_Westminster_Allan_Warren.jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/"Checkerboard_Flats",...t,_SW1_-_geograph.org.uk_-_573512.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Westminster_City_Council_v_Duke_of_Westminster
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Tulk_v_Moxhay dbr:Gerald_Grosvenor,_6th_Duke_of_Westminster dbr:Shirley_Porter dbr:Homes_for_votes_scandal dbr:List_of_works_by_Edwin_Lutyens
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Westminster_City_Council_v_Duke_of_Westminster