Bi-directional Duplex Promoters with Duplicated Enhancers Significantly Increase Transgene Expression in Grape and Tobacco (original) (raw)

• Barfield DG and Pua EC (1991) Gene transfer in plants of Brassica juncea using _Agrobacterium tumefaciens_-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep 10: 308–314.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Beck CF and Warren RA (1988) Divergent promoters, a common form of gene organization. Microbiol Rev 52: 318–326.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bell PJ, Bissinger PH, Evans RJ and Dawes IW (1995) A two-reporter gene system for the analysis of bi-directional transcription from the divergent MAL6T-MAL6S promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 28: 441–446.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Burrow MD, Chlan CA, Sen P and Murai N (1990) High frequency generation of transgenic tobacco plants after modified leaf disk cocultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8: 124–139.
  Google Scholar
• Cook PR (1999) The organization of replication and transcription.Science 284: 1790–1795.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Datla RS, Hammerlindl JK, Pelcher LE, Crosby WL and Selvaraj G (1991) A bifunctional fusion between β-glucuronidase and neomycin phosphotransferase: a broad-spectrum marker enzyme for plants. Gene 101: 239–246.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dresser DW, Jamin SP, Atkins CJ and Guerrier D (2001) An expressed _GNRP_-like gene shares a bi-directional promoter with SF3A2 (SAP62) immediately upstream of AMH. Gene 277: 163–173.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Driver JA and Kuniyki AH (1984) In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience 19: 507–509.
  Google Scholar
• Dynan WS (1989) Modularity in promoters and enhancers. Cell 58: 1–4.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Eszterhas SK, Bouhassira EE, Martin DIK and Fiering S (2002) Transcriptional interference by independently regulated genes occurs in any relative arrangement of the genes and is influenced by chromosomal integration position. Mol Cell Biol 22: 469–479.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fang RX, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S and Chua NH (1989) Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximum expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1: 141–150.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• François IEJA, Broekaert WF and Cammue BPA (2002) Different approaches for multi-transgene-stacking in plants. Plant Sci 163: 281–295.
  Article Google Scholar
• Fry CJ and Farnham PJ (1999) Context-dependent transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem 274: 29583–29586.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gatz C, Katzek J, Prat S and Heyer A (1991) Repression of the CaMV 35S promoter by the octopine synthase enhancer element.FEBS Lett 293: 175–178.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goderis IJWM, De Bolle MFC, François IEJA, Wouters PFJ, Broekaert WF and Cammue BPA (2002) A set of modular plant transformation vectors allowing flexible insertion of up to six expression units. Plant Mol Biol 50: 17–27.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goosen N and Van de Putte P (1995) The regulation of transcription initiation by integration host factor. Mol Microbiol 16: 1–7.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gray DJ (1992) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature zygotic embryos of muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) cultivars. Am J Bot 79: 542–546.
  Google Scholar
• Gray DJ (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in grape. In: Jain SM, Gupta PK and Newton RJ (eds), Somatic Embryogenesis in Woody Plants. Vol. 2 (pp. 191–217) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  Google Scholar
• Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kay R, Chan A, Daly M and McPherson J (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236: 1299–1302.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Keddie JS, Tsiantis M, Piffanelli P, Cella R, Htzopoulos P and Murphy DJ (1994) A seed-specific Brassica napus oleosin promoter interacts with a G-box-specific protein and may be bi-directional. Plant Mol Biol 24: 327–340.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee TI and Young RA (2000) Transcription of eukaryotic proteincoding genes. Annu Rev Genet 34: 77–137.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lemon B and Tjian R (2000) Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. Genes Develop 14: 2551–2569.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li Z, Jayasankar S and Gray DJ (2001) Expression of a bifunctional green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion marker under the control of three constitutive promoters and enhanced derivatives in transgenic grape (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci 160: 877–887.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mitsuhara I, Ugaki M, Hirochika H, Ohshima M, Murakami T, Gotoh Y et al. (1996) Efficient promoter cassettes for enhanced expression of foreign genes in dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol 37: 49–59.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Murashige T and Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Peach C and Velten J (1991) Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters. Plant Mol Biol 17: 49–60.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pérez-Martín J and De Lorenzo V (1997) Clues and consequences of DNA bending in transcription. Annu Rev Microbiol 51: 593–628.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Poulsen C and Chua NH (1988) Dissection of 5' upstream sequences for selective expression of the Nicotiana plumbaginifolia rbcS-8B gene. Mol Gen Genet 214: 16–23.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ptashne M and Gann A (1997) Transcriptional activation by recruitment.Nature 386: 569–577.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pua EC (2000) Transgenic brown mustard (Brassica juncea). In: Bajaj YPS (ed), Transgenic Crops I. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Vol. 46 (pp. 225–242) Springer, Berlin.
  Google Scholar
• Seong GH, Kobatake E, Miura K, Nakazawa A and Aizawa M (2002) Direct atomic force microscopy visualization of integration host factor-induced DNA bending structure of the promoter regulatory region on the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 291: 361–366.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Shigekane H, Kawaguchi Y, Shirakata M, Sakaguchi M and Hirai K (1999) The bi-directional transcriptional promoters for the latency-relating transcripts of the pp38/pp24 mRNAs and the 1.8 kb-mRNA in the long inverted repeats of Marek's disease virus serotype 1 DNA are regulated by common promoterspecific enhancer. Arch Virol 144: 1893–1907.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shlyakhtenko LS, Hsieh P, Grigoriev M, Potaman VN, Sinden RR and Lyubchenko YL (2000) A cruciform structural transition provides a molecular switch for chromosome structure and dynamics. J Mol Biol 296: 1169–1173.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smale ST (2001) Core promoters: active contributors to combinational gene regulation. Genes Develop 15: 2503–2508.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Valerius O, Brendel C, Duvel K and Braus GH (2002) Multiple factors prevent transcriptional interference at the yeast ARO4-HIS7 locus. J Biol Chem 277: 21440–21445.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Velten J and Schell J (1985) Selection-expression plasmid vectors for use in genetic transformation of higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res 13: 6981–6997.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wefald FL, Devlin BN and Williams RS (1990) Functional heterogeneity of mammalian TATA-box sequences revealed by interaction with a cell-specific enhancer. Nature 344: 260–262.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• West AG, Gaszner M and Felsenfeld G (2002) Insulators: many functions, many mechanisms. Genes Develop 16: 271–288.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Xie M, He Y and Gan S (2001) Bidirectionalization of polar promoters in plants. Nat Biotech 19: 677–679.
  Article CAS Google Scholar