The Genetics of Feeding in Caenorhabditis Elegans (original) (raw)

Abstract

The pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans is a nearly self-contained neuromuscular organ responsible for feeding. To identify genes involved in the development or function of the excitable cells of the pharynx, I screened for worms with visible defects in pharyngeal feeding behavior. Fifty-two mutations identified 35 genes, at least 22 previously unknown. The genes broke down into three broad classes: 2 pha genes, mutations in which caused defects in the shape of the pharynx, 7 phm genes, mutations in which caused defects in the contractile structures of the pharyngeal muscle, and 26 eat genes, mutants in which had abnormal pharyngeal muscle motions, but had normally shaped and normally birefringent pharynxes capable of vigorous contraction. Although the Eat phenotypes were diverse, most resembled those caused by defects in the pharyngeal nervous system. For some of the eat genes there is direct evidence from previous genetic mosaic and pharmacological studies that they do in fact affect nervous system. In eat-5 mutants the motions of the different parts of the pharynx were poorly synchronized. eat-6 and eat-12 mutants failed to relax their pharyngeal muscles properly. These pharyngeal motion defects are most easily explained as resulting from abnormal electrical excitability of the pharyngeal muscle membrane.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert P. S., Brown S. J., Riddle D. L. Sensory control of dauer larva formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol. 1981 May 20;198(3):435–451. doi: 10.1002/cne.901980305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albert P. S., Riddle D. L. Mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans that form dauer-like larvae. Dev Biol. 1988 Apr;126(2):270–293. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90138-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avery L., Horvitz H. R. A cell that dies during wild-type C. elegans development can function as a neuron in a ced-3 mutant. Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):1071–1078. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90593-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avery L., Horvitz H. R. Effects of starvation and neuroactive drugs on feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Exp Zool. 1990 Mar;253(3):263–270. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402530305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Avery L., Horvitz H. R. Pharyngeal pumping continues after laser killing of the pharyngeal nervous system of C. elegans. Neuron. 1989 Oct;3(4):473–485. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90206-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bargmann C. I., Horvitz H. R. Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1243–1246. doi: 10.1126/science.2006412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bejsovec A., Anderson P. Functions of the myosin ATP and actin binding sites are required for C. elegans thick filament assembly. Cell. 1990 Jan 12;60(1):133–140. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90723-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Byerly L., Masuda M. O. Voltage-clamp analysis of the potassium current that produces a negative-going action potential in Ascaris muscle. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:263–284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chalfie M., Sulston J. E., White J. G., Southgate E., Thomson J. N., Brenner S. The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 1985 Apr;5(4):956–964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-04-00956.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chalfie M., Sulston J. Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1981 Mar;82(2):358–370. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90459-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Culotti J. G., Russell R. L. Osmotic avoidance defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1978 Oct;90(2):243–256. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DEBELL J. T., DELCASTILLO J., SANCHEZ V. ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY OF THE SOMATIC MUSCLE CELLS OF ASCARIS LUMBRICOIDES. J Cell Physiol. 1963 Oct;62:159–177. doi: 10.1159/000007808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davis R. E., Stretton A. O. Passive membrane properties of motorneurons and their role in long-distance signaling in the nematode Ascaris. J Neurosci. 1989 Feb;9(2):403–414. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-02-00403.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Driscoll M., Chalfie M. The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature. 1991 Feb 14;349(6310):588–593. doi: 10.1038/349588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dusenbery D. B., Sheridan R. E., Russell R. L. Chemotaxis-defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1975 Jun;80(2):297–309. doi: 10.1093/genetics/80.2.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Files J. G., Carr S., Hirsh D. Actin gene family of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol. 1983 Mar 5;164(3):355–375. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Golden J. W., Riddle D. L. The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev Biol. 1984 Apr;102(2):368–378. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Greenwald I. S., Horvitz H. R. unc-93(e1500): A behavioral mutant of Caenorhabditis elegans that defines a gene with a wild-type null phenotype. Genetics. 1980 Sep;96(1):147–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall D. H., Hedgecock E. M. Kinesin-related gene unc-104 is required for axonal transport of synaptic vesicles in C. elegans. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):837–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90391-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hodgkin J., Barnes T. M. More is not better: brood size and population growth in a self-fertilizing nematode. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Oct 22;246(1315):19–24. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hodgkin J., Horvitz H. R., Brenner S. Nondisjunction Mutants of the Nematode CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1979 Jan;91(1):67–94. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hodgkin J. Male Phenotypes and Mating Efficiency in CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS. Genetics. 1983 Jan;103(1):43–64. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.1.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. JARMAN M. Electrical activity in the muscle cells of Ascaris lumbricoides. Nature. 1959 Oct 17;184(Suppl 16):1244–1244. doi: 10.1038/1841244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaczmarek L. K. Voltage-dependent potassium channels: minK and Shaker families. New Biol. 1991 Apr;3(4):315–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kenyon C. A gene involved in the development of the posterior body region of C. elegans. Cell. 1986 Aug 1;46(3):477–487. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90668-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis J. A., Elmer J. S., Skimming J., McLafferty S., Fleming J., McGee T. Cholinergic receptor mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 1987 Oct;7(10):3059–3071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-10-03059.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lewis J. A., Wu C. H., Berg H., Levine J. H. The genetics of levamisole resistance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Aug;95(4):905–928. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.4.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Papazian D. M., Schwarz T. L., Tempel B. L., Timpe L. C., Jan L. Y. Ion channels in Drosophila. Annu Rev Physiol. 1988;50:379–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.50.030188.002115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Priess J. R., Thomson J. N. Cellular interactions in early C. elegans embryos. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):241–250. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90427-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rand J. B. Genetic analysis of the cha-1-unc-17 gene complex in Caenorhabditis. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):73–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rose A. M., Baillie D. L. Genetic organization of the region around UNC-15 (I), a gene affecting paramyosin in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1980 Nov;96(3):639–648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/96.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas J. H. Genetic analysis of defecation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1990 Apr;124(4):855–872. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Trent C., Tsuing N., Horvitz H. R. Egg-laying defective mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1983 Aug;104(4):619–647. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.4.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Warmke J., Drysdale R., Ganetzky B. A distinct potassium channel polypeptide encoded by the Drosophila eag locus. Science. 1991 Jun 14;252(5012):1560–1562. doi: 10.1126/science.1840699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Waterston R. H., Hirsh D., Lane T. R. Dominant mutations affecting muscle structure in Caenorhabditis elegans that map near the actin gene cluster. J Mol Biol. 1984 Dec 15;180(3):473–496. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Waterston R. H. The minor myosin heavy chain, mhcA, of Caenorhabditis elegans is necessary for the initiation of thick filament assembly. EMBO J. 1989 Nov;8(11):3429–3436. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Waterston R. H., Thomson J. N., Brenner S. Mutants with altered muscle structure of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol. 1980 Jun 15;77(2):271–302. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90475-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yuan J. Y., Horvitz H. R. The Caenorhabditis elegans genes ced-3 and ced-4 act cell autonomously to cause programmed cell death. Dev Biol. 1990 Mar;138(1):33–41. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(90)90174-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]