Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli (original) (raw)

Abstract

We have analyzed protein-coding sequences of Escherichia coli and find that codon-pair utilization is highly biased, reflecting overrepresentation or underrepresentation of many pairs compared with their random expectations. This effect is over and above that contributed by nonrandomness in the use of amino acid pairs, which itself is highly evident; it is much weaker when nonadjacent codon pairs are examined and virtually disappears when pairs separated by two or three intervening codons are evaluated. There appears to be a high degree of directionality in this bias: any codon that participates in many nonrandom pairs tends to make both over- and underrepresented pairs, but preferentially as a left- or right-hand member. We show a relationship between codon-pair utilization patterns and levels of gene expression: genes encoding proteins expressed at high levels tend to contain more abundant, but more highly underrepresented, codon pairs, relative to genes expressed at low levels. The nonrandom utilization of codon pairs may be a consequence of their effects on translational efficiency, which in turn may be related to the compatibility of adjacent aminoacyl-tRNA isoacceptors at the A and P sites of a translating ribosome.

3699

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bossi L. Context effects: translation of UAG codon by suppressor tRNA is affected by the sequence following UAG in the message. J Mol Biol. 1983 Feb 15;164(1):73–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bossi L., Ruth J. R. The influence of codon context on genetic code translation. Nature. 1980 Jul 10;286(5769):123–127. doi: 10.1038/286123a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley D., Park J. V., Soll L. TRNA2Gln Su+2 mutants that increase amber suppression. J Bacteriol. 1981 Feb;145(2):704–712. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.2.704-712.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrier M. J., Buckingham R. H. An effect of codon context on the mistranslation of UGU codons in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1984 May 5;175(1):29–38. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90443-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colby D. S., Schedl P., Guthrie C. A functional requirement for modification of the wobble nucleotide in tha anticodon of a T4 suppressor tRNA. Cell. 1976 Nov;9(3):449–463. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90090-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diaz I., Pedersen S., Kurland C. G. Effects of miaA on translation and growth rates. Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Jul;208(3):373–376. doi: 10.1007/BF00328126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fickett J. W. Recognition of protein coding regions in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Sep 11;10(17):5303–5318. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.17.5303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganoza M. C., Fraser A. R., Neilson T. Nucleotides contiguous to AUG affect translational initiation. Biochemistry. 1978 Jul 11;17(14):2769–2775. doi: 10.1021/bi00607a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gouy M., Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 25;10(22):7055–7074. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.22.7055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Jacobzone M., Mercier R. Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):r43–r74. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.213-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gribskov M., Devereux J., Burgess R. R. The codon preference plot: graphic analysis of protein coding sequences and prediction of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 2):539–549. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part2.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grosjean H., Fiers W. Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes. Gene. 1982 Jun;18(3):199–209. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90157-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Holm L. Codon usage and gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Apr 11;14(7):3075–3087. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.7.3075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holmes W. M., Goldman E., Miner T. A., Hatfield G. W. Differential utilization of leucyl-tRNAs by Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Apr;74(4):1393–1397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol. 1981 Feb 15;146(1):1–21. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90363-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnston T. C., Borgia P. T., Parker J. Codon specificity of starvation induced misreading. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195(3):459–465. doi: 10.1007/BF00341447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kohli J., Grosjean H. Usage of the three termination codons: compilation and analysis of the known eukaryotic and prokaryotic translation termination sequences. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;182(3):430–439. doi: 10.1007/BF00293932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laten H., Gorman J., Bock R. M. Isopentenyladenosine deficient tRNA from an antisuppressor mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Nov;5(11):4329–4342. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.11.4329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liljenström H., von Heijne G. Translation rate modification by preferential codon usage: intragenic position effects. J Theor Biol. 1987 Jan 7;124(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80251-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lipman D. J., Wilbur W. J. Contextual constraints on synonymous codon choice. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jan 25;163(3):363–376. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90063-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Manderschied U., Bertram S., Gassen H. G. Initiator-tRNA recognizes a tetranucleotide codon during the 30 S initiation complex formation. FEBS Lett. 1978 Jun 1;90(1):162–166. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80321-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marshall B., Levy S. B. Prevalence of amber suppressor-containing coliforms in the natural environment. Nature. 1980 Jul 31;286(5772):524–525. doi: 10.1038/286524a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McPherson D. T. Codon preference reflects mistranslational constraints: a proposal. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 11;16(9):4111–4120. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.9.4111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller J. H., Albertini A. M. Effects of surrounding sequence on the suppression of nonsense codons. J Mol Biol. 1983 Feb 15;164(1):59–71. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(83)90087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murgola E. J., Pagel F. T., Hijazi K. A. Codon context effects in missense suppression. J Mol Biol. 1984 May 5;175(1):19–27. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90442-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nussinov R. Eukaryotic dinucleotide preference rules and their implications for degenerate codon usage. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jun 15;149(1):125–131. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90264-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pedersen S. Escherichia coli ribosomes translate in vivo with variable rate. EMBO J. 1984 Dec 1;3(12):2895–2898. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02227.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Post L. E., Nomura M. DNA sequences from the str operon of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1980 May 25;255(10):4660–4666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robinson M., Lilley R., Little S., Emtage J. S., Yarranton G., Stephens P., Millican A., Eaton M., Humphreys G. Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Sep 11;12(17):6663–6671. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.17.6663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shpaer E. G. Constraints on codon context in Escherichia coli genes. Their possible role in modulating the efficiency of translation. J Mol Biol. 1986 Apr 20;188(4):555–564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(86)80005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Staden R. Measurements of the effects that coding for a protein has on a DNA sequence and their use for finding genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 2):551–567. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part2.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taniguchi T., Weissmann C. Inhibition of Qbeta RNA 70S ribosome initiation complex formation by an oligonucleotide complementary to the 3' terminal region of E. coli 16S ribosomal RNA. Nature. 1978 Oct 26;275(5682):770–772. doi: 10.1038/275770a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tate V., Finer M., Boedtker H., Doty P. Procollagen genes: further sequence studies and interspecies comparisons. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):1039–1049. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Varenne S., Lazdunski C. Effect of distribution of unfavourable codons on the maximum rate of gene expression by an heterologous organism. J Theor Biol. 1986 May 7;120(1):99–110. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilson J. T., Wilson L. B., Reddy V. B., Cavallesco C., Ghosh P. K., deRiel J. K., Forget B. G., Weissman S. M. Nucleotide sequence of the coding portion of human alpha globin messenger RNA. J Biol Chem. 1980 Apr 10;255(7):2807–2815. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yarus M., Folley L. S. Sense codons are found in specific contexts. J Mol Biol. 1985 Apr 20;182(4):529–540. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zinoni F., Birkmann A., Leinfelder W., Böck A. Cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine into formate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli directed by a UGA codon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(10):3156–3160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]