Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2003 Jun 1;101(11):4569-75.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3017. Epub 2003 Feb 6.
Emily Blood, Montserrat Rue, David Harrington, Martin M Oken, Robert A Kyle, Gordon W Dewald, Brian Van Ness, Scott A Van Wier, Kimberly J Henderson, Richard J Bailey, Philip R Greipp
Affiliations
- PMID: 12576322
- DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3017
Free article
Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma
Rafael Fonseca et al. Blood. 2003.
Free article
Abstract
Nonrandom recurrent chromosomal abnormalities are ubiquitous in multiple myeloma (MM) and include, among others, translocations of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IgH). IgH translocations in MM result in the up-regulation of oncogenes, and include more commonly t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16;q32), and t(14;16)(q32;q23). Based on the recurrent nature of these translocations and their finding since the early stages of the plasma cell (PC) disorders, we hypothesized that they would confer biologic and clinical variability. In addition, deletions of 13q14 and 17p13 have also been associated with a shortened survival. We used cytoplasmic Ig-enhanced interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization to detect deletions (13q14 and 17p13.1), and translocations involving IgH in 351 patients treated with conventional chemotherapy entered into the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group clinical trial E9486/9487. Translocations were frequently unbalanced with loss of one of the derivative chromosomes. The presence of t(4; 14)(p16;q32) (n = 42; 26 vs 45 months, P <.001), t(14;16)(q32;q23) (n = 15; 16 vs 41 months, P =.003), - 17p13 (n = 37; 23 vs 44 months, P =.005), and - 13q14 (n = 176; 35 vs 51 months, P =.028) were associated with shorter survival. A stratification of patients into 3 distinct categories allowed for prognostication: poor prognosis group (t(4;14)(p16;q32), t(14; 16)(q32;q23), and - 17p13), intermediate prognosis (- 13q14), and good prognosis group (all others), with median survivals of 24.7, 42.3, and 50.5 months, respectively (P <.001). This molecular cytogenetic classification identifies patients into poor, intermediate, and good risk categories. More importantly it provides further compelling evidence that MM is composed of subgroups of patients categorized according to their underlying genomic aberrations.
Similar articles
- Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
Fonseca R, Bailey RJ, Ahmann GJ, Rajkumar SV, Hoyer JD, Lust JA, Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Greipp PR, Dewald GW. Fonseca R, et al. Blood. 2002 Aug 15;100(4):1417-24. Blood. 2002. PMID: 12149226 - Molecular cytogenetic aberrations in patients with multiple myeloma studied by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Chen L, Li J, Xu W, Qiu H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Duan L, Qian S, Lu H. Chen L, et al. Exp Oncol. 2007 Jun;29(2):116-20. Exp Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17704743 - Cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: interpretation of fluorescence in situ hybridization results.
Harrison CJ, Mazzullo H, Cheung KL, Gerrard G, Jalali GR, Mehta A, Osier DG, Orchard KH. Harrison CJ, et al. Br J Haematol. 2003 Mar;120(6):944-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04172.x. Br J Haematol. 2003. PMID: 12648063 - The prognostic significance of cytogenetics and molecular profiling in multiple myeloma.
Sawyer JR. Sawyer JR. Cancer Genet. 2011 Jan;204(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.11.002. Cancer Genet. 2011. PMID: 21356186 Review. - Recurrent Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma.
Chan NC, Chan NP. Chan NC, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1541:295-302. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6703-2_23. Methods Mol Biol. 2017. PMID: 27910031 Review.
Cited by
- Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications.
Manier S, Salem KZ, Park J, Landau DA, Getz G, Ghobrial IM. Manier S, et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;14(2):100-113. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27531699 Review. - Synergistic DNA-damaging effect in multiple myeloma with the combination of zalypsis, bortezomib and dexamethasone.
López-Iglesias AA, González-Méndez L, San-Segundo L, Herrero AB, Hernández-García S, Martín-Sánchez M, Gutiérrez NC, Paíno T, Avilés P, Mateos MV, San-Miguel JF, Garayoa M, Ocio EM. López-Iglesias AA, et al. Haematologica. 2017 Jan;102(1):168-175. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.146076. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Haematologica. 2017. PMID: 27540138 Free PMC article. - Identification of unbalanced genome copy number abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma by single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping microarray analysis.
Kamada Y, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Sanada M, Sato-Otsubo A, Enami T, Suzukawa K, Kurita N, Nishikii H, Yokoyama Y, Okoshi Y, Hasegawa Y, Ogawa S, Chiba S. Kamada Y, et al. Int J Hematol. 2012 Oct;96(4):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1171-1. Epub 2012 Sep 13. Int J Hematol. 2012. PMID: 22972171 - Genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma characterized by cIg-FISH: a Brazilian context.
Segges P, Braggio E, Minnicelli C, Hassan R, Zalcberg IR, Maiolino A. Segges P, et al. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(5):e5034. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20155034. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016. PMID: 27074166 Free PMC article. - Genetic markers used for risk stratification in multiple myeloma.
Segges P, Braggio E. Segges P, et al. Genet Res Int. 2011;2011:798089. doi: 10.4061/2011/798089. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Genet Res Int. 2011. PMID: 22567368 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials