std::addressof - cppreference.com (original) (raw)
Defined in header | ||
---|---|---|
template< class T >T* addressof( T& arg ) noexcept; | (1) | (since C++11) (constexpr since C++17) |
template< class T > const T* addressof( const T&& ) = delete; | (2) | (since C++11) |
Obtains the actual address of the object or function arg, even in presence of overloaded operator&.
Rvalue overload is deleted to prevent taking the address of const rvalues.
The expression std::addressof(e) is a constant subexpression, if e is an lvalue constant subexpression. | (since C++17) |
---|
Contents
[edit] Parameters
arg | - | lvalue object or function |
---|
[edit] Return value
Pointer to arg.
[edit] Possible implementation
The implementation below is not constexpr, because reinterpret_cast is not usable in a constant expression. Compiler support is needed (see below).
template
typename std::enable_if<std::is_object::value, T*>::type addressof(T& arg) noexcept
{
return reinterpret_cast<T*>(
&const_cast<char&>(
reinterpret_cast<const volatile char&>(arg)));
}
template
typename std::enable_if<::value, T*>::type addressof(T& arg) noexcept
{
return &arg;
}
Correct implementation of this function requires compiler support: GNU libstdc++, LLVM libc++, Microsoft STL.
[edit] Notes
Feature-test macro | Value | Std | Feature |
---|---|---|---|
__cpp_lib_addressof_constexpr | 201603L | (C++17) | constexpr std::addressof |
constexpr for addressof
is added by LWG2296, and MSVC STL applies the change to C++14 mode as a defect report.
There are some weird cases where use of built-in operator& is ill-formed due to argument-dependent lookup even if it is not overloaded, and std::addressof
can be used instead.
template struct holder { T t; }; struct incomp; int main() { holder<holder*> x{}; // &x; // error: argument-dependent lookup attempts to instantiate holder std::addressof(x); // OK }
[edit] Example
operator& may be overloaded for a pointer wrapper class to obtain a pointer to pointer:
#include #include template struct Ptr { T* pad; // add pad to show difference between 'this' and 'data' T* data; Ptr(T* arg) : pad(nullptr), data(arg) { std::cout << "Ctor this = " << this << '\n'; } ~Ptr() { delete data; } T** operator&() { return &data; } }; template void f(Ptr* p) { std::cout << "Ptr overload called with p = " << p << '\n'; } void f(int** p) { std::cout << "int** overload called with p = " << p << '\n'; } int main() { Ptr p(new int(42)); f(&p); // calls int** overload f(std::addressof(p)); // calls Ptr* overload, (= this) }
Possible output:
Ctor this = 0x7fff59ae6e88 int** overload called with p = 0x7fff59ae6e90 Ptr overload called with p = 0x7fff59ae6e88
[edit] Defect reports
The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.
DR | Applied to | Behavior as published | Correct behavior |
---|---|---|---|
LWG 2598 | C++11 | std::addressof<const T> could take address of rvalues | disallowed by a deleted overload |
[edit] See also
| | the default allocator (class template) [edit] | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | obtains a dereferenceable pointer to its argument (public static member function of std::pointer_traits) [edit] |