Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au
- Subject: Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
- From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:31:49 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20041229173149.Q28146@links.magenta.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20041229152124.GA654@keitarou.bubblesworth.net>; from Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au on Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 02:21:24AM +1100
- References: <[🔎] 20041229152124.GA654@keitarou.bubblesworth.net>
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 02:21:24AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
However, non-free is not part of Debian (as per the social contract) so it would be OK to put GPL'd programs that depend on OpenSSL into non-free?
The GPL special exception doesn't care about "part of" vs. "not part of".
What matters there is "accompanies".
And, a number of web sites are configured with non-free accompanying main. If we could guarantee that none of our mirrors accompanied main with non-free, then it should be ok to put that kind of software in non-free.
-- Raul
Reply to:
- References:
- GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
* From: Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au (Paul Hampson)
- GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
- Prev by Date:Re: LCC and blobs
- Next by Date:mozilla thunderbird trademark restrictions / still dfsg free ?
- Previous by thread:Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
- Next by thread:Re: GPL, OpenSSL and Non-Free
- Index(es):