[llvm-dev] Two-stage build w/ ninja - Tests still use stage1 compiler (original) (raw)

Dirk Schroetter via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 6 03:35:02 PST 2017

Hello Nemanja,

in effect they are. Even in the 2-stage process both ninja and make use the stage1 compiler (with the caveat that there might be a variable which I am missing). But shouldn’t they be built using the stage2 compiler instead ? As that is the compiler we actually will be installing as product of the build and the one that should be tested ?

Thanks,

/Dirk

Am 06.11.2017 um 12:26 schrieb Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja.i.ibm at gmail.com>:

Aren't unit tests always built with the build compiler (which is stage 1 in your case)? On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 11:53 AM Dirk Schroetter via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Folks, I am using a two-stagesimple build like this one: make -G Ninja -DCLANGENABLEBOOTSTRAP=ON ../src ninja stage2-check-all Stage 1 gets built, and when looking at rules.ninja in the stage2-bins I see: rule CXXCOMPILERAnalysisTests depfile = $DEPFILE deps = gcc command = ./bin/clang++ DEFINESDEFINES DEFINESINCLUDES FLAGS−MMD−MTFLAGS -MMD -MT FLAGS−MMD−MTout -MF DEPFILE−oDEPFILE -o DEPFILE−oout -c $in This is just an example, in fact all of the CXXCOMPILER{unit tests} point to the the compiler and linker as per above example. Isn’t that the stage1 compiler that is being used here ? I am pretty sure that I am just missing something here. Any pointers of how I can convince cmake to use the just-built (stage2) compiler for the tests ? Thanks, /Dirk

LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171106/aafc8532/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list