[llvm-dev] RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase (original) (raw)

Zachary Turner via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 19 07:24:29 PST 2019

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:16 AM Michael Platings via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

Regarding a plan for conversion, I'm keen to avoid perfect being the enemy of better.

It seems a bit early to discuss conversion given there’s not consensus on a style. For example:

If we imagine that over time it evolves such that 50% of the variables have

been renamed to camelBack versions of the type names, then it will look like this:

This comment seems to assume that camelBack is the agreed upon style and all we need to do now is move forward, and I do not believe that to be the case -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190219/059363ca/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list