[llvm-dev] RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase (original) (raw)

Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Feb 19 08:25:35 PST 2019

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 15:24, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:16 AM Michael Platings via llvm-dev <_ _llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Regarding a plan for conversion, I'm keen to avoid perfect being the enemy of better. > > > It seems a bit early to discuss conversion given there’s not consensus on a style. For example:

I see it a bit differently. The first question is "should we change the LLVM naming conventions". I view the plan for conversion as essential to answering this question - IMHO if we're going to live with mixed styles for years (which would be the case if there were no concerted conversion effort) then the advantages of changing naming convention are outweighed by the disadvantages by quite some way

Not much to add, just a +1 : this is exactly my view as well.

-- Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190219/23aa8deb/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list