PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1) (original) (raw)
Reinier Zwitserloot reinier at zwitserloot.com
Thu Mar 19 00:30:33 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Why do you feel waiting is a better idea?
Unless you have some sort of language improvement in mind which is
going to become impossible if SMI is added, I'd argue the reverse:
Bigger changes should be introduced in bits and pieces if each piece
is individually useful.
--Reinier Zwitserloot
On Mar 19, 2009, at 08:26, Howard Lovatt wrote:
Hi,
I think that waiting until we can add Traits/Mixins would be better than adding extension methods, glue classes, continuation methods, or static methods in interfaces (Traits would likely include static methods in interfaces). When I blogged about this stuff a while back: http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=220783 There was not much enthusiasm for extension methods etc., but people did like Traits: http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=220916
-- Howard.
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]